You have to look for it.

 

@SuperG.Girl

 

 

 

@Prettyphile @Limerlight @ILUVAdrianaLima @RIP_Cabrini_Green @Stormbringer @Cult Icon @elfstone @frenchkiki

 

 

Texas lawmaker files bill that would penalize men for masturbating

Spoiler

 

A Democratic lawmaker has filed a bill that would, among many provisions, create a $100 fine for men who masturbate and ejaculate outside of a woman’s vagina.

 

The bill, called “A Man’s Right to Know,” was filed Friday, the filing deadline for the legislative session, and appears to satirize current and proposed laws and regulations that have been criticized for restricting women’s access to abortions and health care choices.

 

The bill’s author state Rep. Jessica Farrar, of Houston, who has been outspoken against restrictive abortion laws, said on Twitter Saturday that the measure “mirrors real TX laws and health care restrictions faced by TX women every #txlege session.”

 

The bill calls “masturbatory emissions” outside of a woman’s vagina “an act against an unborn child, and failing to preserve the sanctity of life.”

 

The bill contains provisions that would also put restrictions on vasectomies, Viagra prescriptions and colonoscopies, including:

 

• The state must create an informational booklet called a “Man’s Right to Know” that contains information and illustrations on the benefits and concerns of those three treatments. A man must review the booklet before going through with any of them.

 

• A man must receive a rectal exam and an MRI of his rectum before any of the three treatments.

 

• A man would not be able sue a doctor for refusing to provide those treatments or another procedure if the procedure violates the doctor’s “personal, moralistic, or religious beliefs.”

 

• A doctor must obtain consent from the man before providing the treatment and the man can only give it if he waits at least 24 hours after the doctor’s visit.

 

• The state must establish a registry of nonprofit organizations and hospitals that provide abstinence counseling, a supervising physician for “masturbatory emissions,” and semen storage.

 

• “Masturbatory emissions” must be stored for the wife for conception.

State law requires doctors distribute to women considering an abortion the “Woman’s Right to Know” booklet, which contains illustrations of gestational periods and the risks and side effects of abortions. Women also must wait 24 hours after receiving the booklet and must undergo an ultrasound before the procedure. Abortion of a viable fetus can bring a penalty of at least five years in prison.

 

In late June, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Texas regulations that would have closed more than half of the state’s abortion clinics. The state rules would have required abortions to be performed in hospital-like surgical centers and doctors to have admitting privileges in nearby hospitals.

 

Cool ^^ Men get in trouble for spreading their semen all over the place

Next bill: penalize fellation.

Next next bill: penalize homosexuals

 

Texas just really is the best.

 IT is a strictly rational bio-political line of reasoning, ie in itself it is not supposed to make anyone laugh. its incredibly myopic to dismiss it as another instance of 'medieval preoccupation with sexual morality'

On the contrary, such reasoning is at the heart of many of contemporary culture wars even outside of US, including Russia, Indonesia,  certain mid eastern societies, India, Pakistan etc. 

Before anyone rushes to dismisses Texans as loonies,

consider what Immanuel Kant, founding father of modern social thought has to say on the subject of marriage and sexual relations

Quote

Sexual intercommunity (commercium sexuale) is the use of the other's sexual members and faculties. This use is either natural, by which human beings may reproduce their own kind, or unnatural, which, again, refers either to a person of the same sex or to an animal of another species than man. These transgressions of all law, as crimina carnis contra naturam [crimes of the flesh against nature], are even "not to be named"; and, as wrongs against all humanity in the person, they cannot be saved, by any limitation or exception whatever, from entire reprobation.

    This natural union of the sexes proceeds according to the mere animal nature (vaga libido [unsettled lust], venus vulgivaga [roving sexuality], fornicatio [fornication]), or according to the law. The latter is marriage (matrimonium), which is the union of two persons of different sex for life-long reciprocal possession of their sexual faculties. The end of producing and educating children may be regarded as always the end of nature in implanting mutual desire and inclination in the sexes; but it is not necessary for the rightfulness of marriage that those who marry should set this before themselves as the end of their union, otherwise the marriage would be dissolved of itself when the production of children ceased.

  And even assuming that enjoyment in the reciprocal use of the sexual endowments is an end of marriage, yet the contract of marriage is not on that account a matter of arbitrary will, but is a contract necessary in its nature by the law of humanity. In other words, if a man and a woman have the will to enter on reciprocal enjoyment in accordance with their sexual nature, they must necessarily marry each other; and this necessity is in accordance with the juridical laws of pure reason.

25. The Rational Right of Marriage. 

  For, this natural employment--as a use of the sexual members of the other--is an enjoyment for which the one person is given up to the other. In this relation the human individual makes himself into a thing, which is contrary to the right of humanity in his own person. This, however, is only possible under the one condition, that as the one person is acquired by the other as a thing, that same person also equally acquires the other reciprocally, and thus regains and reestablishes the rational personality. The acquisition of a part of the human organism being, on account of its unity, at the same time the acquisition of the whole person, it follows that the surrender and acceptation of, or by, one sex in relation to the other, is not only permissible under the condition of marriage, but is further only really possible under that condition. But the personal right thus acquired is, at the same time, real in kind; and this characteristic of it is established by the fact that if one of the married persons run away or enter into the possession of another, the other is entitled, at any time, and incontestably, to bring such a one back to the former relation, as if that person were a thing. 

26. Monogamy and Equality in Marriage.

   For the same reasons, the relation of the married persons to each other is a relation of equality as regards the mutual possession of their persons, as well as of their goods. Consequently marriage is only truly realized in monogamy; for in the relation of polygamy the person who is given away on the one side, gains only a part of the one to whom that person is given up, and therefore becomes a mere thing. But in respect of their goods, they have severally the right to renounce the use of any part of them, although only by a special contract.

  From the principle thus stated, it also follows that concubinage is as little capable of being brought under a contract of right as the hiring of a person on any one occasion, in the way of a pactum fornicationis [contract for fornication]. For, as regards such a contract as this latter relation would imply, it must be admitted by all that any one who might enter into it could not be legally held to the fulfillment of their promise if they wished to resile from it. And as regards the former, a contract of concubinage would also fall as a pactum turpe [shameful contract]; because as a contract of the hire (locatio, conductio), of a part for the use of another, on account of the inseparable unity of the members of a person, any one entering into such a contract would be actually surrendering as a thing to the arbitrary will of another. Hence any party may annul a contract like this if entered into with any other, at any time and at pleasure; and that other would have no ground, in the circumstances, to complain of a lesion of his right. The same holds likewise of a morganatic or "left-hand" marriage, contracted in order to turn the inequality in the social status of the two parties to advantage in the way of establishing the social supremacy of the one over the other; for, in fact, such a relation is not really different from concubinage, according to the principles of natural right, and therefore does not constitute a real marriage. Hence the question may be raised as to whether it is not contrary to the equality of married persons when the law says in any way of the husband in relation to the wife, "he shall be thy master," so that he is represented as the one who commands, and she is the one who obeys. This, however, cannot be regarded as contrary to the natural equality of a human pair, if such legal supremacy is based only upon the natural superiority of the faculties of the husband compared with the wife, in the effectuation of the common interest of the household, and if the right to command is based merely upon this fact. For this right may thus be deduced from the very duty of unity and equality in relation to the end involved.

27. Fulfillment of the Contract of Marriage.

   The contract of marriage is completed only by conjugal cohabitation. A contract of two persons of different sex, with the secret understanding either to abstain from conjugal cohabitation or with the consciousness on either side of incapacity for it, is a simulated contract; it does not constitute a marriage, and it may be dissolved by either of the parties at will. But if the incapacity only arises after marriage, the right of the contract is not annulled or diminished by a contingency that cannot be legally blamed.   The acquisition of a spouse, either as a husband or as a wife, is therefore not constituted facto [by the deed]--that is, by cohabitation--without a preceding contract; nor even pacto [by the contract]--by a mere contract of marriage, without subsequent cohabitation; but only lege [by law], that is, as a juridical consequence of the obligation that is formed by two persons entering into a sexual union solely on the basis of a reciprocal possession of each other, which possession at the same time is only effected in reality by the reciprocal use of the other's sexual faculties.

https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/ethics/kant/morals/ch04.htm

 

 

@elfstone It's Texas, and it's hilarious and will never pass...

45 minutes ago, Stromboli1 said:

• The state must establish a registry of nonprofit organizations and hospitals that provide abstinence counseling, a supervising physician for “masturbatory emissions,” and semen storage.

They should add an extra clause;

"The pysician and staff members  operating such facilities must fully disclose their political orientation/affiliation, to ensure that we dont have liberals in charge of our semen strorage, free to exploit them for their own objectives"

Florida got a 4 seed  I thought they would be lower with injuries

 

 

"*insert my real name* You need to take this callout there could be up to 75 people out"

"okay"

3 1/2 hours later:

Foreman: "ya. there's only 20 out come home"

"Okay."

4 1/2 hours and a meal later  

@phenobarbie @ILUVAdrianaLima @Cult Icon @RIP_Cabrini_Green @Stromboli1 @Limerlight @jj3 @toodarnhot @PinkCouture

 

What in the actual fuck   Fuck this, I'm so god damn done. Political Correctness can officially can go fuck itself. I'm out of here. I'd go to Europe that's a giant shit show...   moving to Japan or Russia!

Quote

 

New York To Scrap Literacy Test For Teachers In The Name Of Diversity

 

Prospective teachers in New York will likely no longer have to pass a basic reading and writing literacy exam, the Associated Press is reporting.

The state's Board of Regents is expected to ditch the Academic Literacy Skills Test in part because black and Hispanic teaching candidates struggled to pass the exam, according to the AP. Just 41 percent of black teaching candidates and 46 percent of Hispanics passed the test on their first try, compared to 64 percent of white candidates.

The multiple choice exam is meant to ensure high standards among prospective teachers, which many teaching preparation programs have struggled to do.

A December 2016 study by the National Council on Teacher Quality found that 44 percent of teaching programs "cannot ensure that most of their incoming candidates are among the top half of college students."

 

 

 

Quote

Iowa Students Denounced As Racist For Wearing US Flag Colors

 

Students from one Iowan high school recently apologized to the principal of another Iowan high school when people found their choice of red, white and blue attire offensive.

Supporters of the Des Moines North High School basketball team, many of whose players are from refugee families, were offended when fans of Valley High School's basketball team wore red, white and blue last week, The College Fix reports.

 

"This is an example of BLATANT racism," said Ty Leggett, a Valley High School alum, on the Valley High School - WDMCS Facebook page. "ALL participating should have been pulled and banned from ALL VHS extracurricular events for the remainder of the year! As a parent, I'd be mortified that my son or daughter thought this way, acted in this fashion and refrained from taking a stand against this 21st century inexcusable behavior!"

Erin Ness Carter, a mother living in the Iowan district, remarked that "for the supporters of one team from a primarily white part of town to paint themselves as the 'team of the USA' it strongly implies that the other team, the less white team, is less American."

Some individuals defended the Valley High students.

 

Quote

Carleton University removes scales from its gymnasium

 

Carleton University removed the only scale in their gym after fat students complained that "scales are very triggering."

Carleton Athletics has decided to remove the scale from the gym.

A sign where the scale used to be stated it was removed to encourage people to focus on other ways of measuring their health beyond just their weight.

The sign stated the decision to remove the scale is "in keeping with current fitness and social trends."

 

It's about as big of a crock of shit as having different prerequisites for women going into the military/coast guard. They're expected to do the same job, but they don't need to do as much in the training/application.

 

As for wearing red/white/blue to a game that's not racist that's patriotic. Guess in some peoples heads the definitions got crossed. Gotta love the people who want to embrace being politically correct. White kids can't wear their countries colors because the immigrants might get offended.

@Limerlight Your country is just as fucked   

 

Quote

CANADA: Alberta Government to Schools: Don't Use the Words 'Mother' and 'Father'

Alberta's government has released a new set of guidelines for how to have an "inclusive" environment in its schools - including instructions to avoid using the words "mother" and "father" because, you know, how heteronormative and transphobic are those?

The guidelines - titled "Guidelines for Best Practices: Creating Learning Environments that Respect Diverse Sexual Orientations, Gender Identities, and Gender Expressions," which is very catchy - were released by the New Democratic Party government on Wednesday.

nderneath a section titled "Indicators of this best practice in action," it states:

School forms, websites, letters, and other communications use non-gendered and inclusive language (e.g., parents/guardians, caregivers, families, partners, "student" or "their" instead of Mr., Ms., Mrs., mother, father, him, her, etc.).

Or, as Ashe Schow explains it in a piece for Independent Women's Forum: "It used to be 'Heather has two mommies. Now, it's 'Heather has two non-gendered and inclusive caregivers."

 

Quote

Canadian University Language Campaign: 'Get Over It,' 'Blind,' and 'Skinny' Are 'Violent' Words

A "Language Awareness Campaign" at Western University in London has declared a whole host of words and phrases to be offensive and "violent" - including "get over it," "blind to something," and "skinny."

The point of the campaign, which was part of student orientation, was to warn against using language with an "inherently violent nature" - and featured posters of students explaining why certain words and phrases fall into this category.

For example:

"I don't say that 'I was "blind" to something' because it ignores the experiences of differently abled individuals."

"I don't ask 'who wears the pants in your relationship?' because it expects homosexual couples to subscribe to heterosexual norms."

"I don't say 'White washed' because it is used to insult those who do not conform to negative stereotypes of a community or culture."

"I don't call people 'gingers' because a unique hair colour does not make one inferior."

"I don't say 'you are so skinny' because 'skinny' is not validating"

"We don't say 'Spirit Animal' because it is a form of cultural appropriation."

"We don't say 'freak' because it reduces certain identities and encourages the perpetuation of violence."

"I don't tell people to 'get over it' because it ignores the long-lasting impacts of certain life experiences."

 

 This is what happens when extreme liberals win

And one day no one will be able to say anything because someone will take offense. We will all walk around in a constant state of silence for fear of a lawsuit.

If any of this is true it is sad It gives diversity and racism a bad name. Seems like excuses to do dumbass things more than really embracing diversity. The actions are in fact the opposite of what either one of those things truly mean. This is the world we live in now. People will find whatever reason to justify their actions and the reasoning behind it  

I'm surprised anyone wants to be a teacher nowadays with all the restrictions that are put on them. There will be no more 10+ year to retirement teachers anymore if nothing changes. NY must be hurting for teachers.

 

Refugees getting placed in bum fuck Iowa and you didn't think there would be problems?

 

Carlton is in Canada so who cares!  

There was backlash in Canada because a professor at the University of Toronto refused to use genderless pronouns:

 

 U of T professor attacks political correctness, says he refuses to use genderless pronouns

 

Ontario wanted to remove words of mother and father from Government forms as well in 2015

 

So sadly @PinkCouture the Canadian ones are true, and I live in Alberta our governments municipal, federal & provincial are fucking dumb.

43 minutes ago, Prettyphile said:

@Limerlight You're Your* country is just as fucked   

 

 

 

 This is what happens when extreme liberals win

Your spelling mistake irked me almost as much as Trudeau does on a daily basis, I had to fix that