March 2, 20187 yr 18 minutes ago, JJMarvel said: Any information/guesses which Angels will be going to the Oscar celebrations - Vanity Fair party? I saw Romee her stylist posting a look of her on IG where he mentioned “pre Oscar madness” and Taylor seems a safe lock aswell since she attented the Golden Globes festivities aswell. I'm expecting most of those from last year (perhaps without Jo who is still in Europe) + Lily.
March 2, 20187 yr A lot of the Angels are in LA right now- Sara, Taylor, Jasmine, Stella, Elsa, Martha, Romee. Adriana is packing for somewhere, so probably LA as well. A function with a bunch of evening gowns is a good place to promote their new strapless bra.
March 2, 20187 yr Yes, Behati looks crazy good!!! She might be in the Holiday commercial by summer!! I'm very curios about the angels Vanity Fair & Oscar party outfits, so If someone can get the photos quickly, please post it NEW JO
March 2, 20187 yr I think Taylor Adriana romee and the other angels above might be going to the vanity fair Oscar party
March 2, 20187 yr 17 hours ago, Prettyphile said: She's not a robot. The model is nothing more than a realistic computer-generated image made 3-D. The creator also has a male model. Oh my bad! Very awesome nonetheless!
March 2, 20187 yr 3 hours ago, shver said: Did anybody see Behati’s insta story? She looks so good I can’t believe she only gave birth like two weeks ago Maybe she will walk this year Here is the link: https://scontent-sjc3-1.cdninstagram.com/vp/d09ff0e2ab8cec9cafb40b5bc3c6943c/5A9BF170/t50.12441-16/28269857_350396258779556_3171587438713203671_n.mp4 Downloaded: 28269857_350396258779556_3171587438713203671_n.mp4
March 2, 20187 yr I wonder if she’s contractly obligated to walk? I think Bee will walk if she’s not pregnant again
March 2, 20187 yr 13 minutes ago, shver said: I wonder if she’s contractly obligated to walk? I think Bee will walk if she’s not pregnant again As I mentioned before I am sure VS negotiated something with her in which she has to do something for them so it is not a total lost in investment for VS Adam did say she wants lots of children but I don't think he is on the same page though
March 2, 20187 yr 39 minutes ago, PinkCouture said: As I mentioned before I am sure VS negotiated something with her in which she has to do something for them so it is not a total lost in investment for VS Adam did say she wants lots of children but I don't think he is on the same page though What makes you think he doesn’t want lots of children? I personally never really saw Behati as the “motherly” type and definitely not the type to want a house full of kids running around and making a big mess Not that I pictured Adam as a dad either but I’m more surprised about Behati apparently wanting so many children...
March 2, 20187 yr I thought Adam said he wanted lots of children? Quote Levine, 38, confirmed their second pregnancy on The Ellen DeGeneres Show stating, "I want a lot [of kids], I thrive in chaos." He added, "She was an only child, so she wants, like, 100 babies. I don't know if I can do that. That's a lot of babies." And I vaguely remember him saying something similar after Dusty was born. Edit: Yeah, they asked him after Dusty was born and he was joking about wanting 17 kids, but it definitely sounded like he’s into having a big family in general. Quote “Like 17. Is that reasonable?," he (maybe) jokingly said, and added, "I love kids so much, though. I love seeing kids on the set, too."
March 2, 20187 yr A lot of women get off on having babies (due to the hormonal/psychological shifts that they couldn't predict when they were barren) . This can be seen in the Candice thread. It is also one of the things that kept couples together as each additional baby pair bonds the couple closer, at least in the near term. Without the baby, things get more and more boring. I wager that most women who claim to not want any children due to an imagined ideal during their youth will eventually cave in. Sometimes I wonder if guys with 5 kids did it to keep the relationship alive..
March 2, 20187 yr 47 minutes ago, Cult Icon said: A lot of women get off on having babies (due to the hormonal/psychological shifts that they couldn't predict when they were barren) . This can be seen in the Candice thread. It is also one of the things that kept couples together as each additional baby pair bonds the couple closer, at least in the near term. Without the baby, things get more and more boring. I wager that most women who claim to not want any children due to an imagined ideal during their youth will eventually cave in. Sometimes I wonder if guys with 5 kids did it to keep the relationship alive.. I don’t know where you got that theory from but it’s so inaccurate.
March 2, 20187 yr 44 minutes ago, *Luna* said: I don’t know where you got that theory from but it’s so inaccurate. He got it from the 1800’s. Romee, Elsa and Martha are all done up for an event right now together. Anyone know if it’s for VS?
March 2, 20187 yr 12 minutes ago, toodarnhot said: He got it from the 1800’s. Romee, Elsa and Martha are all done up for an event right now together. Anyone know if it’s for VS? Probably
March 3, 20187 yr 8 hours ago, Cult Icon said: Sorry, Science that being said, Adam can certainly afford 5 +babies Sorry but I have the feeling that it’s your own theory and that it has absolutely nothing to do with science. You sure seem to be stuck in the 1800’s with that kind of mindset because I’ve never read anywhere (nor have I heard) that women supposedly “get off” on having babies because of the hormones etc, that having babies brings all couples closer (wrong again, lots of couples actually go through a hard time once they have a child due to not having a lot of time for themselves/each other and all attention being placed on the baby, which is absolutely normal of course since a newborn can’t take care of him/herself) What exactly “can be seen” in Candice’s thread? Also saying that most women will “cave in” is just wrong and quite disturbing. Don’t even get me started on your theory of men with 5 children “must have done it to just keep the marriage alive”.
March 3, 20187 yr This book covers the hormonal influences of a women's brain. Also, John Gottmann's research/books echo similar things. I especially like the study from the book "Love and Limerance". This is pretty standard knowledge. Men are supposed to 'pair bond' a bit with the baby but it's nowhere near the extent of the woman. Male hormonal levels also change around their own baby. Also, couples are not psycho-biologically designed for permanent relationship. Literally just 2 years- I believe it's around 3 before strong attitudes of deep boredom, and then contempt force themselves out of the woman's consciousness. I know men and women with numerous children (3-5) and the women echoed something similar- they experience a roller-coaster ride of mental imbalance and a spiritual experience. Sometimes their instincts for survival and reproduction take over their thinking brain and "change" their minds. Those welfare/single moms, seemingly insane,.. with 5 plus children from different men are those that are particularly afflicted by this. Also, women who are non-religious yet are opposed to aborting their unwanted babies and would rather ruin their life than undergo a procedure. I think that men who want large families usually do it for greed/ego reasons (self-aggrandizement) and for reasons that are different than for women. I associate it with rich patriarchs and not pop rockers who are about worshiping freedom...
March 3, 20187 yr 3 hours ago, Cult Icon said: I think that men who want large families usually do it for greed/ego reasons (self-aggrandizement) and for reasons that are different than for women. I associate it with rich patriarchs and not pop rockers who are about worshiping freedom... Sorry but do you hear yourself? You’re literally judging thousands of men all at the same time just because they happen to have or would like to have a large family. Has it ever occurred to you that people have children out of love too and that it’s not one big science project or that it’s not only about greed and egotistical reasons? Again, we live in 2018, not 1800. Still wondering what you meant with “it can be seen in Candice’s topic”.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.