May 25, 20177 yr 35 to 40C here in May and it's going to be like that till September. Gotta love hate Global Warming..
May 25, 20177 yr On 5/24/2017 at 5:59 PM, toodarnhot said: Also, Alex getting pissy over this tweet made me roll my eyes. Taking the slang "shorty" literally. I'm going play all her videos in the background later but I am kind of perplexed as to what audience she's aiming at or is this some sort of hobby/therapy for her? What what I have seen it is young girls and aspiring models. She comes across as someone who gets stimulated pretty quickly and throughout the videos she displays her vulnerability, which naturally lowers the guard of the viewer and has some endearing qualities. From a man's POV she's basically advertising herself in an intimate way and I wonder if the boyfriend is sowing the seeds of future issues..
May 26, 20177 yr On 5/23/2017 at 10:50 AM, Prettyphile said: RIP Sir Roger Moore - You will forever be my James Bond A true legend and gentlemen! This is what's been on my mind a bit this week. I've been a huge Bond fan for as long as I can remember, and this one came out of nowhere. Was very much a punch to the gut Tuesday morning when one of my coworkers alerted me to the news. One of the most charismatic actors to ever grace the screen and, from account after account, a true gentleman.
May 27, 20177 yr Going to the course to get my non restricted gun license tomorrow. Should be getting my rifle before middle of July hopefully
May 27, 20177 yr @Prettyphile My OCD can't take Celeste Desjardins' name being spelled wrong in your signature anymore. I can't believe I went a few weeks without saying something.
May 27, 20177 yr What in the actual fuck. Features keep getting larger while her face keeps getting tighter.... @Sanni
May 27, 20177 yr 3 hours ago, Prettyphile said: What in the actual fuck. Features keep getting larger while her face keeps getting tighter.... @Sanni Yep, when I saw the picture, I found the way she looks to be RIDICULOUS to the point that I can’t understand how some could still defend it. Her lips are huge and swollen when they used to be on the thin side, her top lip is misshapen, her old Cupid’s bow shape is gone, and her top lip used to be clearly smaller than her bottom lip, which is not the case anymore. I suspect that she went to the Kylie Jenner School of Lips so she overlines her lips no matter what the occasion (VS, red carpet, off-duty etc.) That way she (if asked) and her fans can just claim that her lips have been overlined till one day she has to fess up. Do you think she has done something else to her face? Like a brow lift?
May 27, 20177 yr @Sanni I honestly don't even what to speculate want she may or may not have had done because I don't feel an overwhelming urge to get my ass chewed out, or go into a long drawn out convo with people who try and prove how wrong I am. Elsa is the new Barbara, and you can never speak ill.. You can PM me and we can talk about it more if you'd like
May 28, 20177 yr 10 hours ago, Sanni said: Yep, when I saw the picture, I found the way she looks to be RIDICULOUS to the point that I can’t understand how some could still defend it. Her lips are huge and swollen when they used to be on the thin side, her top lip is misshapen, her old Cupid’s bow shape is gone, and her top lip used to be clearly smaller than her bottom lip, which is not the case anymore. I suspect that she went to the Kylie Jenner School of Lips so she overlines her lips no matter what the occasion (VS, red carpet, off-duty etc.) That way she (if asked) and her fans can just claim that her lips have been overlined till one day she has to fess up. Do you think she has done something else to her face? Like a brow lift? The question is what hasn't she done to her face? Everything about it seems so off nowadays, I suspect she has done more than go to the Kylie Jenner School of Lips (great name btw).
May 28, 20177 yr 32 minutes ago, *Luna* said: The question is what hasn't she done to her face? Everything about it seems so off nowadays, I suspect she has done more than go to the Kylie Jenner School of Lips (great name btw). I should trademark it, you know that family loves to steal everything Do you think she might have had a minor nose job?
May 28, 20177 yr 21 minutes ago, Sanni said: I should trademark it, you know that family loves to steal everything Do you think she might have had a minor nose job? Lol should definitely do that. I'm actually not too sure about her nose, I've seen a picture of her mother and she seems to have the exact same nose, very long and upturned, just like Elsa's... It did have a much "fuller" look a couple of years ago though, now it looks extremely narrow at certain times so who knows. I wouldn't be surprised lol
May 28, 20177 yr https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/gallery/2017/may/27/climate-change-louisiana-bayous-isle-de-jean-charles Quote Facing climate change on the Louisiana bayous – in pictures Isle de Jean Charles in Louisiana is home to a Native American community who fished, hunted, trapped, and farmed the land. But since 1955, more than 90% of the island’s original land mass has washed away, the loss caused by logging, oil exploration, hurricanes and ineffective flood control. A report by 13 US federal agencies found the island and its tribal residents to be among the nation’s most vulnerable, as the remaining land will be lost to rising sea levels
May 28, 20177 yr BREAKING: Eight people including a sheriff's deputy are shot dead by gunman in Mississippi
May 28, 20177 yr Quote Congratulations, President Macron – Now We Oppose You ATHENS – Prior to the second round of the French Presidential election, DiEM25 (the pan-European movement of democrats, mostly of the left, that I helped to found) promised Emmanuel Macron that we would “mobilize fully to help” him defeat Marine Le Pen. This we did – incurring the wrath of many on the left – because maintaining “an equal distance between Macron and Le Pen,” we believed, was “inexcusable.” But there was a second part to our promise to Macron: if he “becomes merely another functionary of Europe’s deep establishment,” pursuing dead-end, already-failed neoliberalism, we “will oppose him no less energetically than we are – or should be – opposing Le Pen now.” Relieved that Macron won, and proud of our clear support for him, we must now fulfill the second part of the promise. No “honeymoon” period: we must oppose Macron immediately. Here’s why. Macron’s electoral program made clear his intent to continue with the labor-market policies that he began to introduce as former President François Hollande’s economy minister. Having spoken to him about these policies, I have no doubt that he believes in them strongly. He follows a long tradition of blaming the legal constraints on firing workers for the fall in permanent employment and the emergence of a new division between protected and precarious employees – between insiders, with well-paid, quasi-tenured positions, and outsiders, who work as service providers without benefits and often under zero-hour contracts. Trade unions and the left, according to this view, are actually a conservative force, because they defend insiders’ interests while ignoring the plight of the burgeoning army of outsiders. For Macron, a true progressive must not only support reforms that strengthen employers’ right to dismiss and manage workers; equally important are increases in social security for those losing their jobs, training in new skills, and incentives to take up new jobs. The idea is simple: If employers have more control over how long and how much they pay their employees, they will hire more workers under normal contracts. And the improved social safety net will ensure that workers with the right skills will be available. There is, of course, nothing new to this idea. Known by the unfortunate neologism “flexicurity,” it was implemented with some success in Denmark and other Scandinavian countries in the 1990s. But flexicurity is bound to fail badly in France, thus strengthening Le Pen’s xenophobic nationalists, because it can work only in a macroeconomic environment of investment-led growth. Alas, this is not the environment that the new French President has inherited. In today’s France, investment in fixed capital, relative to national income, is at its lowest level in decades – and falling. This reinforces deflationary expectations, which, when dismissals become easier, imply a rapid reduction of permanent, full-time positions. In short, rather than ameliorating the division between insiders and outsiders, Macron’s labor-market legislation would deepen it. Macron’s greatest difficulty will be the same as Hollande’s: dealing with Germany. The German government – and consequently the Eurogroup of eurozone finance ministers, which Germany dominates – never misses a chance to castigate the French for their failure to bring the government’s budget deficit below the agreed 3%-of-GDP limit. Macron has pledged to achieve this by dismissing civil servants, cutting local government spending, and increasing indirect taxes, which ultimately hit the poorest. In any economy afflicted by low and falling investment, cutting government spending and raising indirect taxes is bound to weaken aggregate demand, thus confirming the pessimistic expectations that prevent investors from investing and giving the deflationary wheel another spin. As if this were not enough, Macron has promised to redress an injustice he feels burdens the low-income, asset-rich French: he pledged to reduce taxes on wealth or assets that do not generate incomes above a certain threshold. As with flexicurity, there is a logic to this: Taxing assets that do not generate incomes makes little sense from an ethical, political, or economic viewpoint. Even so, to reduce wealth taxes before closing the loopholes that allow the income-rich (who are often also asset-rich) to pay their share of income tax makes little sense. To do so while practicing austerity on the poor is to commit an act of vandalism on an already divided society. Macron understands the folly in the foundations of the eurozone. And he has promised to work tirelessly to convince Germany that Europe must speedily create a proper banking union, common unemployment insurance, a debt-restructuring mechanism for countries like Greece and Portugal, a proper federal treasury, Eurobonds (operating like US Treasuries), and a federal parliament that legitimizes the federal treasury’s authority. So, what will Macron do when Germany says nein? In fact, the Germans have said so already. According to Wolfgang Schäuble, Germany’s finance minister, all Europe now needs is to convert the European Stability Mechanism into a European Monetary Fund. In other words, if France wants joint funding, it must submit itself to the same conditionality that wrecked Greece. Martin Schulz, the leader of Germany’s opposition Social Democrats, agrees that no new fiscal institution is necessary, proposing only that France and Germany jointly finance some common investment projects. In other words, nein means nein. Hollande, lest we forget, also won the French Presidency by promising to challenge Germany on eurozone macroeconomic policy – and then quickly abandoned the fight. If Macron is to succeed, he will need a credible fallback position and a European strategy that he can pursue without German agreement. Such a plan is not in evidence. All we see is a readiness to do whatever Germany demands in advance, including “flexicurity,” austerity, and so forth, in the hope that Germany will then agree to some of his eurozone reforms before it is too late. Reasonable people understood that Macron ought to be supported against Le Pen. Now they understand that Macron’s policies will worsen the deflationary, regressive cycle that is Le Pen’s greatest ally. With the election over, opposing Le Pen now means opposing Macron.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.