Jump to content
Forum Look Announcement

Editorials

Neo52285
Neo52285
in Adriana Lima

Featured Replies

lmao, if she doesn't want majority of her portfolio to be naked let her. This is a VS model you are talking about her. One who is sometimes thought as being more sexy than she is beautiful...Majority of her career is already in bras and panties and she is sexualized alot, if Adriana was to do more nudes than she already did I can guarantee you people would have all kinds of negative things to say and would take her less serious as a model. And there is absolutely nothing wrong with being prude neither. Plus, Adriana's money maker always has been her face and what she looks like from the neck up. It makes sense thats what is focused on more.

 

But how could anyone complain about a lack of nudity in editorial work when she is a VS model and has been one since 1998. Thats 19 years of half nudity

  • Quote
    3 hours ago, Souled-Out said:

    lmao, if she doesn't want majority of her portfolio to be naked let her. This is a VS model you are talking about her. One who is sometimes thought as being more sexy than she is beautiful...Majority of her career is already in bras and panties and she is sexualized alot, if Adriana was to do more nudes than she already did I can guarantee you people would have all kinds of negative things to say and would take her less serious as a model. And there is absolutely nothing wrong with being prude neither. Plus, Adriana's money maker always has been her face and what she looks like from the neck up. It makes sense thats what is focused on more.

     

    But how could anyone complain about a lack of nudity in editorial work when she is a VS model and has been one since 1998. Thats 19 years of half nudity

     

    Half naked is not naked , ans VS are clothes !!!! she's not naked and if she'll pose nude I would be happy , no word to say about this if it's true nudity , I have never negative things to say when it's real nudity , it's just perfect , nothing to say !

  • Quote
    4 hours ago, protowalkoffame said:

     

    Half naked is not naked , ans VS are clothes !!!! she's not naked and if she'll pose nude I would be happy , no word to say about this if it's true nudity , I have never negative things to say when it's real nudity , it's just perfect , nothing to say !

     

    why she gotta be naked lol

  • Quote
    1 minute ago, Souled-Out said:

     

    why she gotta be naked lol

     

    This guy is complaining about the same thing in at least 3 other threads :rofl: 

    Don't lose your time on this :rofl: 

  • Quote
    1 hour ago, Stormbringer said:

     

    This guy is complaining about the same thing in at least 3 other threads :rofl: 

    Don't lose your time on this :rofl: 

    lmaoo oh ok. I was like,what an odd thing to be pressed over

  • Quote
    6 hours ago, Stormbringer said:

     

    This guy is complaining about the same thing in at least 3 other threads :rofl: 

    Don't lose your time on this :rofl: 

     

    I'm just a fan of nude shoots , I hate bikinis , swimsuit or lingerie !

  • Quote
    20 hours ago, protowalkoffame said:

     

    I'm just a fan of nude shoots , I hate bikinis , swimsuit or lingerie !

     Adriana it's not Candice who lives naked on every shoot, or looke like a porn even in the vs shoot, the same is from other models, like Emily Ratajkowski . The Nudes that Adriana Did had a lot of classy , different of Candice and Emily and some others.  Adriana it's the living proof that you can be sexy even with a lot of clothes. That's why she it's a HF model too. What's the funny being a model of lingerie if you only do nude shoot? When you do a Lingerie ou Swinsuit shoot like VS ou Sports Illustrated, it's so sexy and don't show  too much , and for that you let your imagination speak for you and when you see multiples times a model only with nude, she's not take so seriously, like Candice .. she is a beautiful model, but the must of thing she do it's naked, and look like a porn.. that's why she barely does something like HF .. Diffrent from Adriana.

  • Quote

    I'm sorry, but comparing the nude editorials Candice (and other models like her)has done to porn is completely ridiculous. The same goes for saying she is nude in every shoot. I wish there was some truth to that, but the truth is she is only naked a small fraction of the time. As for models like Candice or say Edita Vilkeviciute for example, being willing to do nudity, it doesn't make them less serious of a model. If anything it shows a seriousness and dedication to ones craft. Anyone can model with clothes on, but it takes even more dedication to model naked, and I am sure that most in the industry see it that way as well. Even if you don't believe that, what nude work Adriana has done is no different then that of many models that do nudity, including Candice. I don't think any of Candice or Adriana's nude work is trashy or porn like for the record, but what is so classy about the nude work Adriana has done, and how is it so different then that of Candice's nude work? In the last 7 years Adriana has been naked for Russell James Angels book, and those were pretty similar to the ones Candice also did for that book. She was also topless for V magazine and Vogue Italy, two magazines Candice has also been topless for. Last but not least, Adriana went topless for Pirelli, and those photos definitely were not the most classy. I mean come on, in one of the photos Adriana was on her hands and knees completely naked besides wearing long black latex dominatrix looking gloves, and she was practically shoving her surgically augmented boobs in your face. How is that the definition of classy nudity, and how is it so much better and more classy then the nudity Candice has done? 

     

    For the record I love Adriana and I don't have any problems with the nude work she has done. I just don't see how it's any different then most of Candice's nude work, or that of other models like Candice.

  • Quote
    57 minutes ago, Bridgeburner7 said:

    I'm sorry, but comparing the nude editorials Candice (and other models like her)has done to porn is completely ridiculous. The same goes for saying she is nude in every shoot. I wish there was some truth to that, but the truth is she is only naked a small fraction of the time. As for models like Candice or say Edita Vilkeviciute for example, being willing to do nudity, it doesn't make them less serious of a model. If anything it shows a seriousness and dedication to ones craft. Anyone can model with clothes on, but it takes even more dedication to model naked, and I am sure that most in the industry see it that way as well. Even if you don't believe that, what nude work Adriana has done is no different then that of many models that do nudity, including Candice. I don't think any of Candice or Adriana's nude work is trashy or porn like for the record, but what is so classy about the nude work Adriana has done, and how is it so different then that of Candice's nude work? In the last 7 years Adriana has been naked for Russell James Angels book, and those were pretty similar to the ones Candice also did for that book. She was also topless for V magazine and Vogue Italy, two magazines Candice has also been topless for. Last but not least, Adriana went topless for Pirelli, and those photos definitely were not the most classy. I mean come on, in one of the photos Adriana was on her hands and knees completely naked besides wearing long black latex dominatrix looking gloves, and she was practically shoving her surgically augmented boobs in your face. How is that the definition of classy nudity, and how is it so much better and more classy then the nudity Candice has done? 

     

    For the record I love Adriana and I don't have any problems with the nude work she has done. I just don't see how it's any different then most of Candice's nude work, or that of other models like Candice.

     

    I'm agree with you ! but Candice has done real nude and very classy ! Adriana for Russell James Angels book was fake nude , only 3 real nude in 7 years , Pirelli , V magazine and Vogue ... and about imagination , I don't care I want to see her nude for real that's all !

  • Quote
    2 hours ago, Bridgeburner7 said:

    I'm sorry, but comparing the nude editorials Candice (and other models like her)has done to porn is completely ridiculous. The same goes for saying she is nude in every shoot. I wish there was some truth to that, but the truth is she is only naked a small fraction of the time. As for models like Candice or say Edita Vilkeviciute for example, being willing to do nudity, it doesn't make them less serious of a model. If anything it shows a seriousness and dedication to ones craft. Anyone can model with clothes on, but it takes even more dedication to model naked, and I am sure that most in the industry see it that way as well. Even if you don't believe that, what nude work Adriana has done is no different then that of many models that do nudity, including Candice. I don't think any of Candice or Adriana's nude work is trashy or porn like for the record, but what is so classy about the nude work Adriana has done, and how is it so different then that of Candice's nude work? In the last 7 years Adriana has been naked for Russell James Angels book, and those were pretty similar to the ones Candice also did for that book. She was also topless for V magazine and Vogue Italy, two magazines Candice has also been topless for. Last but not least, Adriana went topless for Pirelli, and those photos definitely were not the most classy. I mean come on, in one of the photos Adriana was on her hands and knees completely naked besides wearing long black latex dominatrix looking gloves, and she was practically shoving her surgically augmented boobs in your face. How is that the definition of classy nudity, and how is it so much better and more classy then the nudity Candice has done? 

     

    For the record I love Adriana and I don't have any problems with the nude work she has done. I just don't see how it's any different then most of Candice's nude work, or that of other models like Candice.

     

    The only way you consider that to not be the most classy is because she is indeed nude. That photo is literally adriana sitting down nude LMAO. Looking at the camera, sitting, nude. " Not the most classy" what? Her mouth is even closed lol (not half open or anything). Her legs are closed. Her knees are flat, you made it sound like she was in crawling position.

     

    I don't understand how it could be any less classy than any other nude photo, when she is just literally sitting there naked lol . "on her hands and knees" no, she was sitting. " Practically shoving her augmented boobs in your face" No, her breasts were sitting, just like she was sitting lol.

     

    nude.thumb.jpg.99837d0ee04fc6766863dd57d3a83495.jpg

     

    The reaching done in your description...

    I don't think any of it is a big deal lol and there is def no need to compare her to anyone else. I honestly do not think there is such thing as "tasteful/classy nudity". Its nudity. It can only be so tasteful. I will believe nudity can be tasteful and classy when someone can walk down the street nude lol,

  • Quote
    6 hours ago, Bridgeburner7 said:

     I mean come on, in one of the photos Adriana was on her hands and knees completely naked besides wearing long black latex dominatrix looking gloves, and she was practically shoving her surgically augmented boobs in your face. How is that the definition of classy nudity, and how is it so much better and more classy then the nudity Candice has done? 

    .

    Nothing wrong with the pireli shoot,and what you said about that shoot is false,she was sitting in a normal position.And about her breasts,i am sure you felt them and could tell lol.I get that you are a candice fan but at least don't lie about adriana's work/body to defend candice.No need to compare adriana with anyone else,her carreer and popularity since she started modelling speaks for itself.Same with candice

  • Quote
    5 hours ago, Souled-Out said:

     

    The only way you consider that to not be the most classy is because she is indeed nude. That photo is literally adriana sitting down nude LMAO. Looking at the camera, sitting, nude. " Not the most classy" what? Her mouth is even closed lol (not half open or anything). Her legs are closed. Her knees are flat, you made it sound like she was in crawling position.

     

    I don't understand how it could be any less classy than any other nude photo, when she is just literally sitting there naked lol . "on her hands and knees" no, she was sitting. " Practically shoving her augmented boobs in your face" No, her breasts were sitting, just like she was sitting lol.

     

    nude.thumb.jpg.99837d0ee04fc6766863dd57d3a83495.jpg

     

    The reaching done in your description...

    I don't think any of it is a big deal lol and there is def no need to compare her to anyone else. I honestly do not think there is such thing as "tasteful/classy nudity". Its nudity. It can only be so tasteful. I will believe nudity can be tasteful and classy when someone can walk down the street nude lol,

     

    We want to see more real nudity like Pirelli calendar , she's incredible like this , I'm very disappointed to see she refused to pose nude more often ! she's boring with victoria secret and lingerie , I think she's ridiculous ! Too much clothing shooting too !

  • Quote

    Love it! The second cover is nostalgic, reminds me of her work when she was younger

  • Quote

    Her HB cover is stunning. I'm definitely getting old Hollywood vibes. 

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Recently Browsing 0

    • No registered users viewing this page.