Jump to content
Forum Look Announcement

Featured Replies

I know! ^^  A slap in my face :/

 

9 minutes ago, Prettyphile said:

So for sure SI has been paying attention to this thread because we've gotten a report of copyright infringement

" This is copyright infringement using logos of SI Swimsuit. "

 

After doing some research the person is in fact connected to SI, so as of now please don't post any SI logo's.

This one triggered them pretty good :rofl: SI perhaps..... don't.... yanno... post pictures that look like they belong on a porn-sites. Doing so, expect to be meme'd hard. Welcome to the internet bois :smile:

 

Picture only posted so our members know what not to do. :smile::smile:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

image.png

 

When do I start my walk of shame??

Sorry if I put you in troubles guys.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@Prettyphile, did the fake cover that I made and posted ITT for this year's issue cause any trouble?

4 minutes ago, Stromboli1 said:

@Prettyphile, did the fake cover that I made and posted ITT for this year's issue cause any trouble?

No reports yet :rofl: Did you slap some porn on it? That's a guarantee trigger.

SI likes nudity + porn poses, but god forbid anyone attach the idea of porn to said nakedness :rofl:

Apparently the gals who run the magazine have yet to realize the magazine's true purpose besides selling their line of swimsuits...

 

Not ringing any bells SI?

2 minutes ago, Prettyphile said:

No reports yet :rofl: Did you slap some porn on it? That's a guarantee trigger.

SI likes nudity + porn poses, but god forbid anyone attach the idea of porn to said nakedness :rofl:

Apparently the gals who run the magazine have yet to realize the magazine's true purpose besides selling their line of swimsuits...

 

This is what I posted, but it was in a spoiler. :nicole:

 

hJOPBZh.jpg

1 minute ago, Stromboli1 said:

 

This is what I posted, but it was in a spoiler. :nicole:

 

 

 

It's not the actual SI's logo, so I guess it should be ok?

2 minutes ago, Stromboli1 said:

 

Yes

 

That probably makes a difference legally. I remember a story of a Playboy “model” who printed the bunny logo on her business card and Playboy went after her.

7 minutes ago, Stormbringer said:

It's not the actual SI's logo, so I guess it should be ok?

 

Maybe :idk:

 

3 minutes ago, Sanni said:

That probably makes a difference legally. I remember a story of a Playboy “model” who printed the bunny logo on her business card and Playboy went after her.

 

I guess we'll see :idk:

1 hour ago, Stromboli1 said:

 

This is what I posted, but it was in a spoiler. :nicole:

 

 

absolutely no PS skill :ermm::blah:

1 hour ago, RIP_Cabrini_Green said:

 

#NousSommesTousKiki

:rofl:

33 minutes ago, frenchkiki said:

absolutely no PS skill :ermm::blah:

 

You're just jealous of my skills. :p

 

Didn't really even try as it took only 2-3 minutes to do, much like SISI during the MJ years. :laugh:

"Oh look, someone posted our content on the internet on a subthread dedicated to our whole magazine that has over 100 pages, discussion, back and forth talking and speculation, clearly this is a bad thing for posting one of our pictures and other pictures we distribute for free on the internet, let's go after them and we will show them what's what :smile:"

 

HBeePAP.gif

 

"Maybe we need to re-think this"

Ashley will be on Live with Kelly and Ryan on 2/15 and Lais will be on Harry on 2/14

  • Author

Multiple covers? :o

If Lais got it too I have no problem pretending the Ashley one doesn't exist :tongue:

Not a fan of multiple covers or group cover, I prefer single one for all as if to say "you don't like the girl in the cover? DEAL WITH IT!" :rofl: 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.