September 27, 20168 yr My prediction is that SI will tackle “ageism” next by having at least one model who is older than swimsuit models are typically. @SympathysSilhouette What is off-putting about her social media presence?
September 27, 20168 yr 5 minutes ago, Sanni said: My prediction is that SI will tackle “ageism” next by having at least one model who is older than swimsuit models are typically. @SympathysSilhouette What is off-putting about her social media presence? It's not really one thing I could point to. It's an entirely subjective thing.
September 27, 20168 yr Alex has very nice hips and legs. Face = not that of a model. Her waist is so tiny as to be cartoonish. As if she was born without some ribs.
September 27, 20168 yr 20 minutes ago, Cult Icon said: Alex has very nice hips and legs. Face = not that of a model. Her waist is so tiny as to be cartoonish. As if she was born without some ribs. How would you define a model's face?
September 27, 20168 yr 7 minutes ago, SympathysSilhouette said: How would you define a model's face? Not hers and about half of the SI lineup
September 27, 20168 yr 19 hours ago, Limerlight said: No bewbs. Xenia shooting for World Swimsuit in June: The mystery rookie: I think Xenia has quite a big chest actually and the rookie certainly doesn’t have such big breasts that they would render Xenia’s to be nothing.
September 27, 20168 yr 22 minutes ago, Cult Icon said: Not hers and about half of the SI lineup But what is a model's face?
September 27, 20168 yr 1 minute ago, SympathysSilhouette said: But what is a model's face? stupid question one that can exhibit a variety of conceptions
September 27, 20168 yr How can it be a stupid question if you have said someone "doesn't have a model's face" yourself?? If you claim someone doesn't have a model's face you must have some sort of definition for it and it's perfectly fine wanting to know what that definition is.
September 27, 20168 yr It's stupid given the context; I have been a poster here for several years. Of course I have a concept for it.
September 27, 20168 yr 22 minutes ago, Cult Icon said: stupid question one that can exhibit a variety of conceptions Why is it a stupid question? If you start from the premise that such a thing as a model's face exists, it must be possible to define it, however vaguely.
September 27, 20168 yr 17 minutes ago, Cult Icon said: It's stupid given the context; I have been a poster here for several years. Of course I have a concept for it. That is why I asked for your definition of it.
September 27, 20168 yr Man, do you guys have social skills? This is not a classroom exercise in rhetoric and linguistics. The majority of my commentary about models (thousands of posts) is about this.
September 27, 20168 yr "I don't have an answer. I made a vague comment and you should all just go with it."
September 27, 20168 yr You are clueless. I have at least hundreds of posts addressing this; including a lot of conversations with SS in the past, lol.
September 27, 20168 yr 4 minutes ago, Cult Icon said: You are clueless. I have at least hundreds of posts addressing this; including a lot of conversations with SS in the past, lol. Not really. You post about HF girls and sing their praises, and then post about girls like Elle in your bar thread and want her to be successful. Imo, they have two extremely different facial types and yet they're both model material to you so obviously there is not clear ciriteria. Personally I think it's just your offended attitude when you responded when you replied to a legitimate question. Remember when you tone policed me?
September 27, 20168 yr Now you're just trying to win an internet argument with rhetoric. I am before your time. I never praised Elle's face; in fact I don't think it is exceptional. I praised her body, like I do with Charlotte. Different conception. You could post something positive after my posts for once.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.