February 24, 201411 yr Still don't see what they hope to gain with a vote that is obviously rigged.Why don't they just name the ROTY themselves?
February 24, 201411 yr ^^ That's a novel idea, give the award to the model that actually looked the best Granted, there would still be controversy, since opinions would vary greatly as to whom looked the best, but at least it would take out the teeny boppers and make it contest based upon something other than popularity.
February 24, 201411 yr Still don't see what they hope to gain with a vote that is obviously rigged.Why don't they just name the ROTY themselves?Money grab.Let us peons feel incorporated in the magazine even if on a superficial basis, so that next year those who voted are more likely buy the magazine or app just to see if "their girl" reigned supreme.
February 24, 201411 yr Adding: Its also a grab for the advertisement (RAM Trucks)They pay SI for that space so we potentially buy. Each click adds up in the subconscious right? Pay to Play.
February 24, 201411 yr ?_? *Secret Revealed* Chrissy Teigen Solo Cover: 5 Mana 7 Attack 4 Health Deathrattle: Summon a 1/1 John Legend Crying. ( ???)??
February 24, 201411 yr ?_? *Secret Revealed* Chrissy Teigen Solo Cover: 5 Mana 7 Attack 4 Health Deathrattle: Summon a 1/1 John Legend Crying. ( ???)?? Chrissy Teigen Solo Cover 5 Mana, 7 Attack, 4 Heath Deathrattle: Feed off the tears of naysayers. Do an additional 2 damage for every tear received. Bonus: Bring Prettyphile many hours of laughter and joy at the expense of others. +10 Attack on next turn. ? ? ?_? ?? Chrissy Solo Cover ? ? ?_? ?? or Riot.
February 24, 201411 yr Still don't see what they hope to gain with a vote that is obviously rigged.Why don't they just name the ROTY themselves?Money grab.Let us peons feel incorporated in the magazine even if on a superficial basis, so that next year those who voted are more likely buy the magazine or app just to see if "their girl" reigned supreme. Yeah, but for that you at least need the illusion that the vote is not tampered with. That is not the case. It has never been the case.
February 24, 201411 yr ಠ_ಠ *Secret Revealed* Chrissy Teigen Solo Cover: 5 Mana 7 Attack 4 Health Deathrattle: Summon a 1/1 John Legend Crying. ( ・∀・)っ旦 Chrissy Teigen Solo Cover 5 Mana, 7 Attack, 4 Heath Deathrattle: Feed off the tears of naysayers. Do an additional 2 damage for every tear received. Bonus: Bring Prettyphile many hours of laughter and joy at the expense of others. +10 Attack on next turn. ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ Chrissy Solo Cover ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ or Riot. Pretty I love you so much Now make one for me I wanna see what you can do with me as a hearthstone card :Dinah:
February 24, 201411 yr "There's no good reason to assume they're fake" (1) you can see straight incision scars underneath both breasts where implants are inserted (2) her areolas are far too high on her breast for them to be natural; particularly obvious with her left breast (3) her breasts do not hang like natural breasts. They're asymmetrical and crooked. One is shaped like a bolt-on balloon, one is shaped like a football. It would help if the photos were ultra high resolution, but ultimately Sports Illustrated is a company that cheaps out and never releases any photos of high quality. They're worse than Playboy in that sense, and that's saying quite a lot. Warning: Nudity (bodypainting photos) Maybe you guys are right. Her breasts look real enough from the bodypainting pics where she's on her side/back. Then again, they do look kind of weird from the front and Sara Jean Underwood also has breast implants that look decently real from certain angles. Either way, her breasts look kind of strange and the bodypaint they picked for her is frustrating, because it covers up the parts we need to see, lol. I'm still going to give her the benefit of the doubt until I see more damning evidence (ie, something higher res/less airbrushed than SI shots) - maybe she just has weird boobs. Also not sure if anyone has mentioned this,but if you're having trouble scrolling down after voting in ROTY, if you're in Chrome, resize your browser thinner, then scroll down. Why is that thing f'ed anyway. And if the poll is rigged what do they have to gain from Samantha Hoopes winning? That's weird. At least Sara Sampaio has a lot of votes now.
February 24, 201411 yr It's called rounding up. Or down. It's fairly obvious that it wouldn't necessarily add up to 100% even if the numbers were true.
February 24, 201411 yr Last year the numbers swung between 79% and 111%... that's one hell of a round up/down if you ask me.
February 24, 201411 yr There are allegedly thousands of votes. 11.87% can be anywhere from 11.865 to 11.875, so if a few more are in the down rounding category, e.g. random numbers X.872 + Y.253 + Z.264 + A.251 -> X.87 + Y.25 + Z.26 + A.25, there's .01 that went missing, other way round X.896 + Y.237 + Z. 247 -> X.90 + Y.24 + Z.25, .01 added, thus why it can add up to something like 99.98 to 100.02 give or take.
February 24, 201411 yr ^ This. There's always a margin of error in these things. If it adds up to 100.05% or 99.7% it's still acceptable, unless it goes up to 102% or something
February 24, 201411 yr Edit: strong feeling this convo will turn into a long drawn out thing like Robin Thicke. Saving staff headaches. We can continue the convo in private, or in our group pm
February 24, 201411 yr Edit: strong feeling this convo will turn into a long drawn out thing like Robin Thicke. Saving staff headaches. We can continue the convo in private, or in our group pm I appreciate your investigative journalism on this matter. Those weasels.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.