5 minutes ago, protowalkoffame said:

 

But she only talk about nudity , VS is fashion clothes , we don't take clothes off when we work for VS , Lingerie is fashion clothes , so .... Take off her clothes is to be nude !

Lingerie isn't considered "fashion clothes", and although it's not nudity, you do show a lot of your body when you are in lingerie.

6 minutes ago, protowalkoffame said:

 

But she only talk about nudity , VS is fashion clothes , we don't take clothes off when we work for VS , Lingerie is fashion clothes , so .... Take off her clothes is to be nude !

you're right I'm not sure she talks about VS in this comment. What can be worrying is about the people she has unfollowed. I'm not very good at seeing this but if she continues to follow some of the angels and VS staff there's no need to worry.

She didn't mention vs it could be about something else 

4 minutes ago, *Luna* said:

Lingerie isn't considered "fashion clothes", and although it's not nudity, you do show a lot of your body when you are in lingerie.

 

Sorry but lingerie it's not nudity , a lot of people think it's the same , but your intimate parts are covered so it's clothes , you have push up and many other things , alot of model have not the same body than in lingerie when you see them full nude !!! your body is covered by lingerie so you don't take your clothes it's just more sexy than swimsuit !

30 minutes ago, protowalkoffame said:

 

Sorry but lingerie it's not nudity , a lot of people think it's the same , but your intimate parts are covered so it's clothes , you have push up and many other things , alot of model have not the same body than in lingerie when you see them full nude !!! your body is covered by lingerie so you don't take your clothes it's just more sexy than swimsuit !

I never said lingerie is nudity but modeling clothes vs lingerie is a very different thing. Whatever this is about, VS, Love magazine, or something else, she should clarify herself.

2 hours ago, Warhol said:

Barbara Palvin is one of my favorite models, what happened with her VS career? 

OMG she was absolute favorite for VS and still is. She is also my all time favorite model for anything else.

In my opinion, I think she started partying too much, coming in tired and worn out and maybe even hung over and started gaining weight...I think she looks great with extra weight but i doubt VS agreed with me. so I think she just wasn't taking it seriously enough. look at the rest of the angels/models except Behati...they alltake their job seriously , exercise a lot and eat right and sleep and dont party every night or close to...I think barbara is getting more serious now but I think the VS ship for her has sailed. 

 

I don't know who any of the new models for VS are.

I only care about Candice, Elsa, Taylor, Jasmine, Grace, and kind of Rommee....VS please make Grace an angel!!!

Sara, Stella, Martha, Adriana, Lais could all leave and I wouldn't care. I would actually be thankful. 

9 minutes ago, bump said:

OMG she was absolute favorite for VS and still is. She is also my all time favorite model for anything else.

In my opinion, I think she started partying too much, coming in tired and worn out and maybe even hung over and started gaining weight...I think she looks great with extra weight but i doubt VS agreed with me. so I think she just wasn't taking it seriously enough. look at the rest of the angels/models except Behati...they alltake their job seriously , exercise a lot and eat right and sleep and dont party every night or close to...I think barbara is getting more serious now but I think the VS ship for her has sailed. 

 

I don't know who any of the new models for VS are.

I only care about Candice, Elsa, Taylor, Jasmine, Grace, and kind of Rommee....VS please make Grace an angel!!!

Sara, Stella, Martha, Adriana, Lais could all leave and I wouldn't care. I would actually be thankful. 

Totally agree hopefully this happens when the angels renew their contracts in Feb 

2 minutes ago, Diorsfashion said:

Totally agree hopefully this happens when the angels renew their contracts in Feb 

I just don't know who I would want them to add that would be realistic...I mean, I'd love to see Grace as an angel and I think that will definitely happen...but Idk any current models, like I dont even know who most of the regular/filler VS models are and I just don't care because they are pretty much all boring and unappealing. 

I want Barbara and Gigi (before she lost all that weight and lost her spark/fun attitude) but I know that's not happening. 

Who would you want them to add? I need some new models to look into but I am super picky lol

Just now, bump said:

I just don't know who I would want them to add that would be realistic...I mean, I'd love to see Grace as an angel and I think that will definitely happen...but Idk any current models, like I dont even know who most of the regular/filler VS models are and I just don't care because they are pretty much all boring and unappealing. 

I want Barbara and Gigi (before she lost all that weight and lost her spark/fun attitude) but I know that's not happening. 

Who would you want them to add? I need some new models to look into but I am super picky lol

I want vs to remove Martha Stella and lais they're so boring and have no presence like what's the point of them being there lol but the other angels are trying id keep romes jas Taylor Elsa and add grace they don't need filler angels they should have only 7 and keep it like that 

38 minutes ago, *Luna* said:

I never said lingerie is nudity but modeling clothes vs lingerie is a very different thing. Whatever this is about, VS, Love magazine, or something else, she should clarify herself.

 

Sorry but for me Lingerie and clothes are fashion and it's same thing !!! same thing for nudity because there are covered nudity and full nudity , for me covered is not nudity , I'm very picky about that , a lot of reporters confuse nudity, bare, lingerie and pornography, and eroticism .... For me a model who is nude covered or in lingerie is absolutely not nude ! 

 

you guys try to make wine out of water with what little we actually know about why Adriana did what she did. Give it time. 

 

 

the flip flopping here is mind numbing.

6 minutes ago, protowalkoffame said:

 

Sorry but for me Lingerie and clothes are fashion and it's same thing !!! same thing for nudity because there are covered nudity and full nudity , for me covered is not nudity , I'm very picky about that , a lot of reporters confuse nudity, bare, lingerie and pornography, and eroticism .... For me a model who is nude covered or in lingerie is absolutely not nude ! 

+1 

1 hour ago, protowalkoffame said:

 

Sorry but lingerie it's not nudity , a lot of people think it's the same , but your intimate parts are covered so it's clothes , you have push up and many other things , alot of model have not the same body than in lingerie when you see them full nude !!! your body is covered by lingerie so you don't take your clothes it's just more sexy than swimsuit !

I agree.

But it's not like she's not posed nude, even for VS.

Edited December 10, 20177 yr by ivancica
Wrong photo was posted.

Why did you post that manip, @ivancica?

1 minute ago, Sanni said:

Why did you post that manip, @ivancica?

Sorry, I copped the wrong photo. 

Friendly reminder that this is what VS used to give us

 

 

And this is what we get nowdays

 

 

This brand has go downhill so bad so fast  

 

 

^ To be fair, the unofficial video wasn’t released until years later.

1 hour ago, protowalkoffame said:

 

Sorry but for me Lingerie and clothes are fashion and it's same thing !!! same thing for nudity because there are covered nudity and full nudity , for me covered is not nudity , I'm very picky about that , a lot of reporters confuse nudity, bare, lingerie and pornography, and eroticism .... For me a model who is nude covered or in lingerie is absolutely not nude ! 

Lingerie is definitely part of someone’s wardrobe however it’s not clothes as in “stuff you wear outside in public”. I guess we will just have to agree to disagree. For me personally there’s a very big difference in a model that only models clothes or one that only models lingerie/swimsuits. The latter is much more revealing than the one who wears clothes imo.

29 minutes ago, *Luna* said:

Lingerie is definitely part of someone’s wardrobe however it’s not clothes as in “stuff you wear outside in public”. I guess we will just have to agree to disagree. For me personally there’s a very big difference in a model that only models clothes or one that only models lingerie/swimsuits. The latter is much more revealing than the one who wears clothes imo.

 Not agree , lingerie is like swimsuit but more eleborate and sexy , on the beach nobody wear fashion clothes  ! There are place for clothes , other place for lingerie or swimsuit but it's clothes , it's not because you have less clothes that you revealing more , the best part are always hide !