3 hours ago, Limerlight said:

I think you'd look nice in one Pinky 

 

Just not at work, you might have a stern meeting after that.

 

 

 

The last time I wore anything close to a bralette was when I was about 11 yos. Back in the days they called it a "training bra." If I try wearing anything like that now i would look like a total disaster!!! People would I assume I am one of those People of Walmart  

3 minutes ago, PinkCouture said:

 

The last time I wore anything close to a bralette was when I was about 11 yos. Back in the days they called it a "training bra." If I try wearing anything like that now i would look like a total disaster!!! People would I assume I am one of those People of Walmart  

You'd look fine in anything  

 

Anyways....  

 

 

7 hours ago, PinkCouture said:

 

I meant wearing a bralette underneath your clothes? What is the problem with that? Yeah VS seems to promote the idea of wearing one of their bralettes without anything else, but there are so many bralettes out there from other brands, even expensive brands like Agent Provocateur are making them, that are totally fine to wear UNDER your clothes for the day. If that is considered wrong nowadays then I really don't get it... 

Same here, PinkCouture.  As a teenager, I used to love wearing sports or minimal padding bras because they were so comfortable.  But then I realized in cold weather or air conditioning, you could see through to the nipple.  Needless to say, it attracted embarrasing attention at school and the workplace.  Nowadays I always wear a padded bra to ensure full coverage whenever I'm in a professional setting.  

 

A sports bra or bralette just won't cut it for me most days of the week.  Although I would agree that during the weekend or in a more casual environment, it'd be fine.  Also, Luna, I would agree that the bralettes work better for women with smaller chests, but they are absolute disasters for a C cup person like me.  To each their own.  VS's agressive bralette marketing just affirms how much they have shifted towards a younger teenage customer base.  But I guess they've got a join the bralette bandwagon to survive.   

7 hours ago, *Luna* said:

I meant wearing a bralette underneath your clothes? What is the problem with that? Yeah VS seems to promote the idea of wearing one of their bralettes without anything else, but there are so many bralettes out there from other brands, even expensive brands like Agent Provocateur are making them, that are totally fine to wear UNDER your clothes for the day. If that is considered wrong nowadays then I really don't get it... 

 

Oh ok. In your original post it was unclear you meant underneath your clothes. We thought you meant it as a regular top  

1 hour ago, PinkCouture said:

 

Oh ok. In your original post it was unclear you meant underneath your clothes. We thought you meant it as a regular top  

Nope not at all, I personally would never wear one of the VS bralettes or any for that matter as a regular top, but I can see why it can be cute to wear one from VS to a concert or festival. 

 

@Aurora Dawn I can't speak out of experience but I can imagine a bralette isn't going to be as comfortable as a normal bra for someone with a C cup. And I definitely agree with the fact that it seems they have to jump on this wagon to survive, which is pretty sad considering they used to be the best lingerie store out there for women. Now it seems more like a big PINK store even though it says "Victoria's Secret". 

VS is turning into an extension of OLD NAVY

 

 

 

Two Pink spokesmodels? Makes me think they're going to change up moving their Pink girls up to the Angel roster after their contracts. 

 

I like Zuri, so awesome for her.

 

 

another nope for VS Pink  congratsssss ....Zuri is plain boring  . how they do that if they have Grace Elizabeth i cant believe it.

 

 

i wish they get ride of Rachel and choose Grace and well with Zuri . but Zuri and Rachel nope

17 minutes ago, toodarnhot said:

Two Pink spokesmodels? Makes me think they're going to change up moving their Pink girls up to the Angel roster after their contracts. 

Let's hope. Rachel works more or less for Pink but she has no place as an Angel IMO.

so, she walk this year at the vsfs?

14 minutes ago, ceceshores said:

Let's hope. Rachel works more or less for Pink but she has no place as an Angel IMO.

You're right, Zuri is better than her or than any model currently in VS PINK

LMfao Zuri is absolutely awful, not even in just PINK but as a model in general, but congrats 

21 minutes ago, ceceshores said:

Let's hope. Rachel works more or less for Pink but she has no place as an Angel IMO.

I'm wondering if it's a sign of Rachel not working out as well as they projected she would if they're bringing on another contracted girl.  When Elsa and Bee were the main Pink girls, they were the only ones and they just rotated through other catalog girls, right? 

 

Edit: @Nathyrrr Yes, she'll be guaranteed to walk. 

Zuri better then Grace?  The fuck...

@toodarnhot I think they've only had one Pink spokesmodel at a time, yeah. They'll sometimes throw in another random girl with her for bigger events but never more than one official Pink spokesmodel.

 

It could be that Rachel isn't working out as well as VS thought she would and they're bringing in Zuri in hopes she'll fill whatever void and/or eventually replace her. Or they're putting even more focus on Pink and hiring more girls to be spokesmodels. Doesn't Pink do better than anything else they sell? 

I choose Devon over Zuri anytime ?? i mean... DEVCHEL ??

 

o.o