November 20, 200915 yr Author Special thanks to Chocolate for blocking the pics . Well...we know where we stand on booties . Well...on a lighter note, what I always found funny was that someone like Petra is 5'10 and skinny, Miranda is 5'9 and skinny whereas someone like Lucy Pinder and Keeley are 5'5 and 5'6 probably 20-30 pounds bigger and size 10-12? Probably twice their size and their booties aren't much bigger or rounder than these two. It seems there isn't much booty in glamour modeling either ...(though they're known for their breasts obviously). Disclaimer: since Chocolate taught me how to block pics I almost find reasons to .
November 20, 200915 yr Joe it's find and dandy to put those girls up against each other in a side by side shot but you're judging them based on the 'height' of their career. I like Miranda but her body has always seemed to petite I feel uncomfortable giving her higher scores for her body still due to the fact that half the time when you look at her, (especially when her body was at it's alleged best) she bears a strong resemblence to a 12 year old with an overly developed body. Petra was always a woman, and I'm quite sure that her personality and what not colored at least my votes. However I also strongly feel that she had the better body, at least in her heyday.Eva 6 - Not really my cup of tea.
November 21, 200915 yr Author ...I feel uncomfortable giving her higher scores for her body still due to the fact that half the time when you look at her, (especially when her body was at it's alleged best) she bears a strong resemblence to a 12 year old with an overly developed body. Petra was always a woman, and I'm quite sure that her personality and what not colored at least my votes. Well, thanks for the honesty . Final Thought However, @ all in general, sorry and nevermind . I see this is one of those things that more explainations (particularly of the non-leg, abs, hips ect. variety) will only make me more confused and the other side eventually more annoyed. I should have known if I see at least 95% simularity its not like someone's going to find some hidden third tit for me or something, so maybe its best not asked. But the purpose wasn't to campaign for one of my favorite [bods] anyway nor to give the 3rd degree for the heck of it, just pure curiosity (in light of one being close to the top and other close to the bottom), so...nevermind . 8 votes needed...
November 21, 200915 yr ^ I totally understand why you brought the similarity to everyones attention. It does appear confusing I also think that probably 99% of the people who vote in this comp gave higher scores more readily at the start.
November 21, 200915 yr Author Stam, what did you think of the glamour model collage BTW ? Especially in light of them being 20-30 pounds bigger, I hadn't thought about it before... Gotta move on since I'm at a computer now, won't be home for awhile.... (Esti Ginzborg, Nominated by Roxanne)
November 21, 200915 yr 6. Her body is nice but the only thing that impresses me are the hips. The glam girls are actually more attractive me to me, but not in the butt department. I've noticed Brit glam models never have butts
November 21, 200915 yr She has nice proportions, but there's just something unmistakable about her body (maybe the softness of it?) that screams "teenager" to me, and that's not sexy.6.5
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.