October 2, 200915 yr 5.5. She's definitely got a reasonable bod, but I think they are very good pictures of her. In others I've seen she looks a little sickly thin. So, a 5 1/2! xx I agree with what you said btw, Joe. Whereas everyone else in the world would probably give Meagan a 9 for her slamming bod, fashion-minded people are not going to be attracted to it. That's cool. This is a fashion forum after all! Just as long as Natasha Poly or Snejana don't get a bunch of 10's we're cool!
October 2, 200915 yr Author I didn't know this side of Natalia , thanks Roxanne . I don't call fans...but I just have to tell PlayGirl . 10 Joe --->
October 2, 200915 yr 4 :| I don't know what exactly it is but there is something that bothers me a great deal about her figure. o.0
October 2, 200915 yr Baah, love this thread but it's weird to me. People seriously think Nat's body is better than Meagans? Nat has small boobs, not much of a butt, and skinny arms and legs. Meagan has nice boobs, a poppin ass, and slim arms and legs. I'm not saying Nat is gross, but her body is not very feminine to me.
October 2, 200915 yr I think there is more to a feminine body then boobs and butt I agree, but IMO, basically, circular shapes ( e.g curves) are feminine, and square or triangular shapes are male. This is an opinion poll, I guess just some of the opinions puzzle me!
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.