July 7, 200916 yr lily's edit is right up my alley..freaky, unsettling ang gorgeous! iwant to go post it to the strange and unique thread right now!!! but..i have to say after years of not giving izabel her due i am impressed with how she posed and she made the clothes really pop! Lily ftw
July 7, 200916 yr natalia did a good jod, bad BARRR iss soo sexxyyyyy!!! and professional! vote: bar!!
July 7, 200916 yr Because the original supermodels are most beautiful women than the models of today. Subjective, I happen to disagree and I've seen a number of them in person. I can understand both opinions. Though I don't think reliance on makeup and photoshop has gone down by any stretch . But it all boils down to taste, like food. I think there are beautiful women on both sides though I think non-conventional beauty or a woman with blatantly unconventional features has a much better chance to be big today than the other era. I think the "ugliest" from the previous is probably more attractive than the ugliest of today whereas the prettiest vs. prettiest is more of a fair fight. But the beauty of the different sides is subjective indeed, if Babe Polls doesn't teach us anything else...its the subjectivity of beauty . That 9th pic of Izabel is by far my favorite pic of the two. Two totally differenty types of editorial's though . I think Lily's is better overall, though independent of which model did better, IMO. I vote Lily .
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.