Jump to content
Forum Look Announcement

Featured Replies

 

 

17 hours ago, Cult Icon said:

^^ Sexual control of the uncontrollable. :rofl:  It's "so childish" to enjoy viewing some of the most beautiful women of the world..

 

If I was her I would encourage him to view  BZ  but never masturbate.  

 

He only masturbate on German poesy.

& German is still the ugliest language.

 

 

The guy is playing the victim when he insults & bash other members. :blink:

I'm a FUCKING jealous person, but if i caught my gf enjoying a hot male model, i couldn't mind her so much ... or even female ones :p I would worry though knowing me ahah

 

38 minutes ago, frenchkiki said:

 

The guy is playing the victim when he insults & bash other members. :blink:

 

Did someone say Anschluss ? lol

Fergie and Josh Duhamel just split so I'm shielding myself up for those women cries of ''Real Love Doesn't Matter :cry: '' comments, get over it Salie

21 hours ago, Stromboli1 said:

Duplicitous head games imo. :rofl:

 

21 hours ago, Cult Icon said:

^^ Sexual control of the uncontrollable. :rofl:  It's "so childish" to enjoy viewing some of the most beautiful women of the world..

 

Damn right. If heterosexual men are not allowed to enjoy viewing beautiful women, then how far are we from machines??:rofl:

 

Spoiler

:rofl::rofl:

 

 

 

I even think that when we start to enjoy beauty is when we start to be grownups! So, not childish at all.

Sometimes people tend to consider that sociological matters are scientific and have "undeniable theories". And that's political corectness! If they meet disagreement, they assume it's because others are not able to understand these "undeniable" theories. Sometimes, they may even feel anger, thinking that truth should be like a roadroller...

 

Spoiler

 

 

Truth (if there is one :rofl:)  is that, in sociological matters (or other soft sciences like philosophy), there are some solid facts, but it's mainly about opinion, subjective theories, etc. This may make the world "scary" for some, but that's how it is!

 

Spoiler

 

 

And it's the same (at a more moderate scale) for hard sciences. Sometimes old theories got replaced, because even hard mountains may get eroded one day...

15 hours ago, Enrico_sw said:

 

 

Damn right. If heterosexual men are not allowed to enjoy viewing beautiful women, then how far are we from machines??:rofl:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

:rofl::rofl:

 

 

I even think that when we start to enjoy beauty is when we start to be grownups! So, not childish at all.

+100!!

I don't like the snapchat effects that are popular with girls.  The dog one is the worst

 

tumblr_owe06ggXjy1tptdedo2_540.jpgtumblr_owe06ggXjy1tptdedo1_400.png

 

 

Not sure it's the right topic but she made me laugh!

Patriot :

If you have #for2ndAmendment on your twitter profile

you are not a patriot

you're someone with a crazy gun fetish

patriots support the whole constitution not just the part that enable your toddlers to play Russian roulette

:rofl:

http://fusion.net/story/349892/average-woman-size-16/

 

We have been getting a lot of these stories/opinion pieces lately.

 

Basically a celebration of the "bigger" female body type instead of the thinner type that was held up as the beauty ideal before.

 

Whilst I think these pieces start from a well-meaning place, in the end, aren't they doing the exact same thing as the people they so loathe, only from the other side of the spectrum?

Celebrating very thin bodies vs. celebrating much larger bodies?

Isn't the true form of body positivity the acknowledgement that all sizes should be able to feel good in their skin?

 

I personally hate that high fashion seems to only use very thin models on their runway (I am not even talking about plus-size models getting a chance but even the slightly more curvier models are shunned) but I'm against shaming designers into using bigger models. Mostly because I think this should be something that is part of their larger vision and thus that change should happen organically.

@ILUVAdrianaLima

I think you are going to like her.

"Are you such a precious snowflakes that you get triggered by someone kneeling during the national anthem?

Bless you heart!

Maybe your patriotism worth less than your Trump university diploma?"

:rofl:

 

She nailed it to the cross! Amen!

 

On 9/26/2017 at 2:52 PM, SympathysSilhouette said:

http://fusion.net/story/349892/average-woman-size-16/

 

We have been getting a lot of these stories/opinion pieces lately.

 

Basically a celebration of the "bigger" female body type instead of the thinner type that was held up as the beauty ideal before.

 

Whilst I think these pieces start from a well-meaning place, in the end, aren't they doing the exact same thing as the people they so loathe, only from the other side of the spectrum?

Celebrating very thin bodies vs. celebrating much larger bodies?

Isn't the true form of body positivity the acknowledgement that all sizes should be able to feel good in their skin?

 

I personally hate that high fashion seems to only use very thin models on their runway (I am not even talking about plus-size models getting a chance but even the slightly more curvier models are shunned) but I'm against shaming designers into using bigger models. Mostly because I think this should be something that is part of their larger vision and thus that change should happen organically.

 

It's a really interesting discussion, albeit one where positions of super-defensiveness are almost always likely to be taken on both sides of the argument. While I too don't doubt that the body positivity movement was created with decent intentions, I also can't help wondering whether unconditional acceptance of one's own body is, in its own way, just as unrealistic and unattainable as the so-called 'mainstream' beauty ideal. I don't agree with stoking guilt about not having unwavering confidence any more than not being thin.

 

 

I believe that Russians are more traditional in the views:

 

https://www.voanews.com/a/russia-kalashnikov-monument-unveiled/4034854.html

 

 

A monument to Russian firearm designer Mikhail Kalashnikov is unveiled during a ceremony in Moscow, Russia, Sept. 19, 2017.

 

I can't imagine something like this happening in the US today.  Like the designer of the AR-15 getting a statue in DC..or a cartoon honoring MK appearing on Google search.

 

Quote

MOSCOW — 

The new statue of Mikhail Kalashnikov cradling his signature AK-47 assault rifle unveiled Tuesday in Moscow commemorates one of Russia's most renowned and reviled inventions. By some estimates, the AK-47 and its versions account for about one-fifth of the world's firearms, the rugged and reliable weapon of choice for many armies, terror groups and drug gangs...

 

 

The funny thing is that the designers made a serious mistake on the statue:

 

mobile_high-yhp.jpg

 

This is the schematic for the Nazi STG-44 from WW2, not the postwar AK-47

 

Quote

In the words of Russian President Vladimir Putin: “The Kalashnikov rifle is a symbol of the creative genius of our people.” Or as Russia's Culture Minister Vladimir Medinsky put it: the Kalashnikov rifle has become “Russia's cultural brand.”

754598872617574.jpeg

 

 

A bust at Belorussky train station in Moscow. 

 

h_EZn_O8_EG3c_I.jpg

 

That is the Soviet T-34 from WW2-  apparently related to America and Pepsi-Co./Frito-Lay

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.