Jump to content
Forum Look Announcement

Featured Replies

8 minutes ago, Sanni said:

Samantha Hoopes has cellulite on her ass and thighs as well and SI photoshops them out too:

 

 

 

Which adds to the point. If we are embracing size, then shouldn't we embrace cellulite as well? Or maybe Samantha shouldn't embrace them because they ain't cute looking.

I think SI is an equal opportunity photoshopper when it comes to some less flattering moments like cellulite or a fat-roll showing. Doesn’t matter if your size is Samantha Hoopes or Ashley Graham.

28 minutes ago, Clauds said:

Sailor Brinkley Cook 

Robin Holzken 

Chase Carter 

Alexis Ren 

Danielle Herrington 

Georgia Gibbs

Kate Wasley

Raven Lyn 

Vita Sidorkina

Barbara Palvin 

Kate Upton

Kate Bock 

Samantha Hoopes

Lais Ribeiro

Jasmyn Wilkins

Anne De Paula

Myla Dalbesio 

Ashley Graham 

Bianca Balti 

+

Model search people

 

Wow..... that's a terrible lineup. :chicken:

^ That's the worst lineup in YEARS ...

25 minutes ago, Sanni said:

I think SI is an equal opportunity photoshopper when it comes to some less flattering moments like cellulite or a fat-roll showing. Doesn’t matter if your size is Samantha Hoopes or Ashley Graham.

 

But then why pushing the whole "love yourself" crap then? I'm sorry but all women have imperfections. If you want us to embrace being overweight, then you should also want us to embrace cellulite, fat-roll, moles, being a bit underweight, or whatever other imperfection it is that you have. And then you have Alexis Ren who has had more work done than Cher, does it mean MJ & Cia think she looks better after all the work she had done? Because she clearly is not embracing herself. SI is selling their own line which they said would fit eveeeeryone, guess what? it doesn't, I personally can buy their stuff (not that I want to, those swimsuits are u.g.l.y) because they don't come in my size because I am apparently too small for it. Am i not a "real woman", therefore should I not embrace myself then?. My biggest issue is that I think they are pushing for a double standard and still setting unrealistic beauty standards, which is what they are allegedly trying to fight. Real women comen in all sizes and if you want to get really real, then go unretouched with your magazine and show the girls how they truly look.

 

Also yes the lineup this year is by far the worst I've seen since I started following the magazine. Yikes :ninja: 

The line up is awful. Genuinely, they would be better off cutting it in half and having decent shots of all the girls. Also, no Kelly returning? Really? Or any Asian girl at all? Diversity in regards in plus size only eh? 

 

Wth regards to photoshop - what did they used to do back in the Elle, Paulina etc days? Maybe those women were just hot?

 

over this magazine now. Love the shade in the boards though.

All that Tea was fuckin delicious Clauds , so on point girl

3 hours ago, Jaku84 said:

 

 

Wth regards to photoshop - what did they used to do back in the Elle, Paulina etc days? Maybe those women were just hot?

 

 

They were. If you watch the videos you can see how athletic and flawless they were.

  • Author
7 minutes ago, Sanni said:

Wow, her face does look weird :o Totally botoxed!

Right? Though the same while watching the first video..

im still processing why the keep Samantha and Kate Boring bock and left Nina and Hannah F .

  • Author
Just now, MarVS said:

im still processing why the keep Samantha and Kate Boring bock and left Nina and Hannah F .

And I'm still hoping about a surprise cover with Nina and Hannah :rofl:

1 minute ago, PinkCouture said:

 

Maybe they didn't want to come back ;) 

almost sure thats not true

  • Author
Just now, PinkCouture said:

 

Maybe they didn't want to come back ;) 

Hannah sure but Nina? She doesn't do much these days, SI was her biggest job and she deserved a solo cover before leaving :sad:

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.