Jump to content
Bellazon

2019 SI Swimsuit


Recommended Posts

This is all I've got, I'm obviously missing people but I can't be bother to look. If that photographer got the cover then this will be a wreck, there's not a single model in that shoot I think has cover potential :no: 

 

Location #1 - Kangaroo Island, Australia 

ph: Josie Clough 

- Camille Kostek (rookie #1) 

- Hailey Clauson 

- Olivia Culpo

- Samantha Hoopes

- Myla Dalbesio 

- Tara Lynn (rookie #2)

 

Location #2 - Las Catalinas, Costa Rica

ph: James Macari

Hunter McGrady 

- Barbara Palvin

- Lais Ribeiro

- Kate Bock

- Jasmine Sanders (rookie #3) 

- Danielle Herrington 

 

Location #3 - WatamuKenya

ph: Yu Tsui

Haley Kalil (rookie #4)

- Paulina Porizkova

- Robin Holzken

- Anne de Paula

- Halima (rookie #8)

 

Location #4 - Bahamas

ph: 

- Winnie Harlow (rookie #5)

- Kelsey Merritt (rookie #6)

- Olivia Brower (rookie #7)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/2/2019 at 8:39 PM, Prettyphile said:

@He or She who will not be named.

If said person is in fact the cover photographer, then I have a feeling who got it. In fact all signs point to yes (atm). If he's not, it's fair game.

Actually come to think about it. If she did get the cover then it would make sense considering she's in that gimmicky wheel house of Mj's..

 

Should I get the Post-It notes ready or just a shredder? :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I obviously can't speak for everyone left of Joe Biden, but I can't recall reading or hearing anyone with anything close to my politics being impressed by this trend either.

 

The leftists think it's tepid, box-checking liberalism which doesn't challenge or even seem aware of power (no matter which sort of power structure--or post-structure--a given leftist would want to see criticized, it's definitely not something SI's editors think about).

 

The liberals generally see it as a lagging indicator, less a bold taboo breaker than a cynical adoption of messaging made acceptable by more controversial activism. In this respect they seem to half agree with conservatives, at least with regards to the former, that it's a kind of cynical pandering. But they're annoyed for a slightly different reason, because they feel patronized.

 

Typically both, even if they were predisposed to favor such things for other reasons, see it coming from the SI Swimsuit issue as a kind of fruit of a poisonous tree. Different people go back and forth on objectification versus empowerment, but broadly speaking the SI Swimsuit issue is still widely known as something teen boys used to jack off to before free internet porn; so they're disinclined to take any attempts at activism on its cover or in its pages seriously. MJ et al seem to think they're in charge of an influential cultural icon, yet most people think they run a glorified once-yearly lads' mag.

 

The people who seem to like this sort of stuff? Media liberals, who are their own thing, because they get to be woke in a way their corporate sponsors find acceptable while still showing tits for views. Hence why it gets so much more press than any discourse seems to justify; and also one reason why they seem keen to keep doing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found the pictures in her personal topic and I just thought they were officially published somewhere, it was a naive move from me, didn’t mean to cause any harm here or anywhere else. I apologize, guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, lostdiadem said:

I found the pictures in her personal topic and I just thought they were officially published somewhere, it was a naive move from me, didn’t mean to cause any harm here or anywhere else. I apologize, guys.

No harm, no foul. We aren't going to risk lawyers again, so we have to take a hard stance on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...