April 24, 20169 yr 24 minutes ago, GuessGirl said: They need to drop Gigi and add Taylor. Gigi looks awful for Maybelline. ROFL Gigi's online following is HUGE. They're not dropping her.
April 24, 20169 yr 26 minutes ago, GuessGirl said: Maybelline has more a young teenage look. Taylor has that look, she fit perfect for them. They need to drop Gigi and add Taylor. Gigi looks awful for Maybelline. But then again I found her face ugly. Ohh I understand, I thought that the contract with L'Oreal was bad for her career or that they barely pay.
April 25, 20169 yr 34 minutes ago, Limerlight said: 2016 when your "online following" matters. Welcome to modern fashion world.
April 25, 20169 yr 26 minutes ago, Schemer said: Welcome to modern fashion world. But good for Taylor, even if it's not a contract, beauty campaigns pay well and I knew it was only a matter of time before she landed one with that face. I don't like Gigi for Maybelline either but meh, I don't shop there so I don't care.
April 25, 20169 yr 10 hours ago, Limerlight said: Good I was hoping Halle Barry would get some more work.
April 25, 20169 yr 2 hours ago, taylorhills said: Totally +1 1 hour ago, Warhol said: why? Maybelline is more youthful and L'Oreal is more older and "sophisticated". It's not that Taylor can't do L'Oreal or look good in it, it's that her "look" fits Maybelline better. 1 hour ago, GuessGirl said: Maybelline has more a young teenage look. Taylor has that look, she fit perfect for them. They need to drop Gigi and add Taylor. Gigi looks awful for Maybelline. But then again I found her face ugly. Yep. Gigi might be your cup of tea but there is no way anybody can call her ugly. It's just delusional to say so. I could understand if you're talking about Baldwin though 1 hour ago, everyboulevard said: Doesn't L'Oreal have enough spokespeople that if they added Taylor she'd be just another face in the crowd and nothing special? Good point. But Taylor would outshine anyone there. She's THAT gorgeous. Sorry Doutzen, Babara and Luma.
April 25, 20169 yr It's not because she's Work one time with L'oreal that mean she signed a contract. Beside she even did not shoot with the main team of l'oreal. (Kenneth Willardt, stephan lancien ...)
April 25, 20169 yr 13 minutes ago, toodarnhot said: Can you link the source for this? A friend of me on Facebook
April 25, 20169 yr 20 hours ago, JazzyJas said: +1 Maybelline is more youthful and L'Oreal is more older and "sophisticated". It's not that Taylor can't do L'Oreal or look good in it, it's that her "look" fits Maybelline better. Yep. Gigi might be your cup of tea but there is no way anybody can call her ugly. It's just delusional to say so. I could understand if you're talking about Baldwin though Good point. But Taylor would outshine anyone there. She's THAT gorgeous. Sorry Doutzen, Babara and Luma. Ugly is in the eye of the beholder.
April 25, 20169 yr 1 hour ago, GuessGirl said: Ugly is in the eye of the beholder. Some people also think Moon landings were faked, doesn't mean they make any sense.
April 25, 20169 yr 1 hour ago, JJMarvel said: Vogue May 2016 ^^ This made me immediately think of Brooke. The comparison is real.
April 25, 20169 yr dont understand the pose at the 1st cover but second cover makes up for it damn she slays!
April 25, 20169 yr 1 hour ago, Prettyphile said: ^^ This made me immediately think of Brooke. The comparison is real. I see no resemblance at all
April 25, 20169 yr She looks phenomenal in the beauty shot cover. There's something awkward and kind of weak about her posing in the other two.
April 26, 20169 yr 7 hours ago, GuessGirl said: Ugly is in the eye of the beholder. Yeah some people think Adriana Lima is ugly. Some people think flowers are ugly. Some people think eating cockroaches is beautiful. Eye of the beholder.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.