October 15, 20168 yr Author This is kind of a surprise event for them to attend. It's not VS but I assume they'd have to approve their girls to go to this. Seems not really what VS do seeing as how they don't like to promote the girls in this way and they don't like the whole club/partying lifestyle.
October 15, 20168 yr They are free to do whatever they want as long as it's legal. They don't have to ask vs permission to throw a party! That's just stupid. Now the underage Taylor and Romee that's another thing..
October 15, 20168 yr Author 9 minutes ago, star2011 said: They are free to do whatever they want as long as it's legal. They don't have to ask vs permission to throw a party! That's just stupid. Now the underage Taylor and Romee that's another thing.. Throwing a party no but an event um yes. VS is a global brand and they're girls are under a microscope. Any kind of major event like this would definitely need to be approved by VS. VS can't have their girls out at some clubs drunk or acting a fool even if it isn't their own event because it looks bad for the brand. That's why I said I'm surprised so many angels are doing this one event for a nightclub. You don't see them doing club gigs like this.
October 15, 20168 yr This is an Halloween party, it's not like they go out everynight and get wasted, that's what vs doesn't like... By throwing a Halloween party ( to where they aren't even using vs name for) they don't need to ask permission, that assumptions is just stupid, vs doesn't own their lives. And they don't have to ask permission to do everything. Even if it's in a nightclub...
October 15, 20168 yr Author Well you can tell by the advertising they are not using the VS name or the term angel. I just think it's strange. They can definitely go out and do what they want but they are spokesmodels for a huge brand. And their name no matter what it is it's under a VS angel contract. Why do you think a lot of these girls, especially before didn't work as much outside of VS. Clauses in contract. That's what contracts are there for. I'm sure they can do whatever but having a big concentration of their girls at one event which they aren't endorsing is strange to me. And I think that they would in fact need to run it by the people at VS first because they are still known for that brand. It's not about owning their lives but they work for them and have contracts. Wherever they go they are a spokesmodel for that brand and have to uphold it. That's why I find this event so strange and out of place. And yes it doesn't look good for Taylor or Romee which is why I'm even more confused. Well Taylor more. Romee is 21 now.
October 15, 20168 yr 8 hours ago, Prettyphile said: Again Taylor and Romee weren't billed in Vegas... and now they are, major difference. It may be an 18+ thing. When I was living in Frisco I was 19-20 and I was able to get to pretty much every club, I just got a really fucking sparky green bracelet (that was a bitch to get off) to mark me as under 21, and people 21+ would get a print on their hand so they could buy drinks. Luckily enough I had awesome friends who got alcohol for me until that one time we got kicked out because a certain Clauds got too shit faced to keep pretending she wasn't drinking So VS can totally get away saying they (Romee and Taylor) can attend the event, they just can't drink.
October 15, 20168 yr 1 hour ago, star2011 said: This is an Halloween party, it's not like they go out everynight and get wasted, that's what vs doesn't like... By throwing a Halloween party ( to where they aren't even using vs name for) they don't need to ask permission, that assumptions is just stupid, vs doesn't own their lives. And they don't have to ask permission to do everything. Even if it's in a nightclub... Whenever there is an article about a model who has walked the VS Runway even once, they always use the 'VS Model ... did this'. ofc VS has to be involved in making sure its top names rn aren't getting wasted. I am not saying they ask permission but it might be in their contracts that they can't party that much.
October 15, 20168 yr 2 hours ago, Clauds said: It may be an 18+ thing. When I was living in Frisco I was 19-20 and I was able to get to pretty much every club, I just got a really fucking sparky green bracelet (that was a bitch to get off) to mark me as under 21, and people 21+ would get a print on their hand so they could buy drinks. Luckily enough I had awesome friends who got alcohol for me until that one time we got kicked out because a certain Clauds got too shit faced to keep pretending she wasn't drinking So VS can totally get away saying they (Romee and Taylor) can attend the event, they just can't drink. I understand that, but the billing just to be able to walk into the club clearly states 21+, not 18+
October 15, 20168 yr 4 hours ago, GuessGirl said: But Romee is 21yrs old. She is legal. Is only Taylor the illegal one.
October 15, 20168 yr I hate GoT so no It was merely PedoBear saying too old. GoT is incredibly boring to me.
October 15, 20168 yr 17 minutes ago, Limerlight said: I hate GoT so no It was merely PedoBear saying too old. GoT is incredibly boring to me.
October 16, 20168 yr Tbh I feel like a girl with smaller boobs would have been able to wear some of these outfits fine- at least the slip dress one.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.