Jump to content
Bellazon

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, SuperG.Girl said:

 

"climate change" and "climate change religion" are 2 different things. Climate change is literally climate change. "Climate change religion" .... is a clan of people who made climate change a central theme of their life, they think they understand the phenomenon better than the rest of us and therefore have the moral authority to order us how to live our lives, how to consume, how to invest how to treat fossil fuel .... etc. Those fanatics are not scientists ...... the sooner we get rid of them the less harsh the climate change effects are going to be :rofl: 

 

True. Which is basically what @Enrico_sw is saying here (to which I basically agree as well)

43 minutes ago, Enrico_sw said:

Sure, it doesn't make it any less real. The awareness of this issue brought rational reactions, like the diversification of energy mixes, more renewables, more energy savings (which is also economically rational).

 

My concern is that it also brought many very negative behaviours:

- the climate change is the trojan horse of many fads (=lunacies)  from the far left, like: eating bugs, anti-natalist views, apocalyptical ideas, etc.

- virtue signalling in the social media (not just celebrities) whose point is just to say "I'm better than you" (which is harmful)

- it's used as a social class signal which deteriorates a much needed unity

- the promotion of anti-free speech views and censorship (which is VERY bad)

- peer pressure in certain field, which kills creativity (but I have to admit peer pressure always existed and it's a silent blight:ninja:)

 

Anyway, I feel like I'm rambling on again :nicole:

 

 

To then be called "another adherent to the climate change religion".

 

So... someone is not even making a difference between the two.

Posted
1 hour ago, Enrico_sw said:

I don't adhere to cults, I just try to review facts, without giving in to the last zeitgeist fads. It's not that easy, considering how low the quality of the media is.

 

I was talking about Idris Elba. :rofl:

 

It's a cult that fear mongers to gain power by enacting policy changes with hidden agenda in it.

Posted
1 hour ago, Stormbringer said:

:banghead: 

Ok. You've understood nothing...

Look for any serious scientist on the matter and the tons of data about it.

The serious ones though... not people ranting on Youtube.

 

Almost every year becomes the hottest in recorded history, almost every summer having an average higher temperature than the last; just this summer Antarctica peaked at a new record high temperature just to name a significant example. Every year winters become shorter. Less snow every winter. Worst draughts every time, more, and more devastating wildfires. Polar ice melting at accelerating rates... etc.

 

99%-100% of the scientific community has a consensus on this. People who studied for years and years to be prepared as a scientist and have dedicated most of their lives to study this with tons and tons of data. With every publication peer reviewed by other scientists equally or more prepared who will look for any little flaw on their methods... And yet there is consensus.

 

But sure... you know better because you haven't seen an "ice age"...

 

We only have 10 years left. :chicken:

 

1 hour ago, Stormbringer said:

:banghead: 

Denying the overwhelming scientific consensus sounds much more like a religion to me.

 

Twas talking about Idris Elba.

 

@Enrico_sw and I have had talked about climate change related things before.

Posted
1 hour ago, SuperG.Girl said:

"climate change" and "climate change religion" are 2 different things. Climate change is literally climate change. "Climate change religion" .... is a clan of people who made climate change a central theme of their life, they think they understand the phenomenon better than the rest of us and therefore have the moral authority to order us how to live our lives, how to consume, how to invest how to treat fossil fuel .... etc. Those fanatics are not scientists ...... the sooner we get rid of them the less harsh the climate change effects are going to be :rofl: 

 

Exactly!

Posted

Lindsay Graham and the Republicans can miss me with this nonsense and get fucked with this bill. :war:
 

https://www.theverge.com/interface/2020/3/12/21174815/earn-it-act-encryption-killer-lindsay-graham-match-group

 

If tech companies can censor hate speech, misgendering, etc they can censor and stop weirdos from preying kids. Don't need the government getting involved.

Posted
1 hour ago, Stormbringer said:

Ok. My bad there then.

How could I've known though?

 

Well I thought Enrico would've known I was talking about Idris Elba since we rage on woke celebrities to which would've provided the context, so I fucked up in that regard. I shouldn't have been lazy and just edited the text to just show the stuff related to Idris Elba.

Posted
10 hours ago, SuperG.Girl said:

the sooner we get rid of them the less harsh the climate change effects are going to be :rofl: 

 

What you mean by getting rid of them..feeding them to the polar bears?  :rofl:

Posted
6 minutes ago, Matt! said:

What you mean by getting rid of them..feeding them to the polar bears?  :rofl:

I meant strip them from the attention they so desperately need .......... but now that you mention polar bears can also do the job :rofl: 

Posted
12 hours ago, Stromboli1 said:

@Enrico_sw I thought you knew I was talking about Idris. :rofl:

 

Don't worry, got it now! :laugh:

 

--------

 

BTW, here's another example of the negative side effects of people being aware of environmental problems:

https://www.theepochtimes.com/bubonic-plague-may-join-homelessness-rats-on-list-of-crises-in-los-angeles_3035204.html

 

California has a serious rodent/rats problem. These animals bring a lot of diseases with them, including the buboninc plague, but the progressive environmentalists don't want to eliminate the rodents....! If the next pandemic is the plague, then this Covid-shit will look like a piece of cake compared to the shitstorm a plague would bring! :tumbleweed:

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Matt! said:

 

What you mean by getting rid of them..feeding them to the polar bears?  :rofl:

 

Why not... as long as you don't feed tem to the rodents in LA! :nicole:

Posted
14 minutes ago, Stromboli1 said:

2 teams in LA and they both have the same color scheme which makes a lot of sense. :rofl:

 

Those morons can't get anything right :rofl::rofl: 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...