June 27, 201113 yr Truly random pairings are not predictable. I'm not trying to be rude but it rather spoils the fun of not having the slightest idea who's going to go up against who next. That's just my opinion, but to say that the pairings are random is a bit of a misnomer and completely untrue.
June 27, 201113 yr I can understand the plight of both sides. Alphabetical isn't random in that its ordered by alphabet, but then the nominees have no more or less of an advantage seeing as how you have no more control over the name you were born with than you do having your name pulled out of a hat. Though of course, for me the fun is in sometimes seeing (even when my person loses) that I'm not as alone here as I thought (not to mention of all the possible ways to vote, voting the same as a woman from Oklahoma and a man from Germany), seeing how much even an uderdog I don't like is appreciated, seeing if some underdogs will do better than expected and if some of the it girls will do worse than expected and for me the absolute best of all being the prospect of learning new names .
June 28, 201113 yr Author Truly random pairings are not predictable. I'm not trying to be rude but it rather spoils the fun of not having the slightest idea who's going to go up against who next. That's just my opinion, but to say that the pairings are random is a bit of a misnomer and completely untrue. I see what you mean. I thought it was random enough, but now I see it wasn´t. I was just trying to be fair (as Joe said, no more or less of an advantage when it goes to name). Ok, I will mix it a little bit more, that´s no problem I can understand the plight of both sides. Alphabetical isn't random in that its ordered by alphabet, but then the nominees have no more or less of an advantage seeing as how you have no more control over the name you were born with than you do having your name pulled out of a hat. Though of course, for me the fun is in sometimes seeing (even when my person loses) that I'm not as alone here as I thought (not to mention of all the possible ways to vote, voting the same as a woman from Oklahoma and a man from Germany), seeing how much even an uderdog I don't like is appreciated, seeing if some underdogs will do better than expected and if some of the it girls will do worse than expected and for me the absolute best of all being the prospect of learning new names . Joe sometimes these competitions really surprise me, some underdogs go further and favs are eliminated sooner than I thought them to be, so no one really knows.
June 28, 201113 yr I'm not complaining Jennka, the competition is great, it's just that sometimes true randomness can be much more fun then anything else
June 28, 201113 yr Author I agree, it´s more fun of course I have mixed it a little bit more (completely) so I hope it will be better
June 29, 201113 yr Author Results:Candice Swanepoel - 90Gisele Bundchen - 70Kate Upton - 59Pan Shuanghuag - 42Tara Lynn - 35Pan and Tara are eliminated.
June 29, 201113 yr Author We have 20 groups with 5 women in each group. I chose the groups randomly by use of numbers. GROUP H Candice Boucher Ginta Lapina Julie Ordon Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Emily Didonato You have 10 votes to split. Split them however you want, you don´t even have to use them all, but you can´t split MORE than just 10 votes. If you are not a fan of any of these women, you can give each 1 or zero or whatever you want. Hope everything is clear. 2 women with the least points will be eliminated and 3 go on. I will stop voting on Friday morning in my time zone (that gives you two days to vote). Clicking on names will put you on their respective threads. To them I will also put a noticement of this competition for their fans to vote for them. Candice Boucher Ginta Lapina Julie Ordon Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Emily Didonato Vote!
June 29, 201113 yr Candice Boucher - 1Ginta Lapina Julie OrdonRosie Huntington-Whiteley - 8Emily Didonato - 1
June 29, 201113 yr Candice BoucherGinta Lapina - 9Julie OrdonRosie Huntington-Whiteley - 1Emily Didonato
June 29, 201113 yr Candice Boucher - 3Ginta LapinaJulie Ordon - 2Rosie Huntington-Whiteley - 3Emily Didonato - 2
June 29, 201113 yr Candice Boucher - 1Ginta Lapina - 7Julie OrdonRosie Huntington-Whiteley - 1Emily Didonato - 1
June 29, 201113 yr Candice Boucher - 3Ginta LapinaJulie Ordon - 4Rosie Huntington-WhiteleyEmily Didonato - 3Wow, this was a tough draw.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.