40 minutes ago, frenchkiki said:

Because she could have had a nice career at doing what she does best : showing her body.

Working for playboy, agent provocateur, any glamour magazines and photographer who love girls like her.

But no. It's so much better for her to look like a cheap porn starlet on every single pictures posted.

If she only decided to really do porn for real, she -at least according to me- will do something interesting.

I really think she is an idiot. Like not intelligent.

 

 

 

4 hours ago, Schemer said:

Emily Ratajkowski is an American glamour model. For those who don't know what is considered a glamour model, look it up. One of her first shoots she did in her career was a full frontal nude shoot at the age of 18. As a mainstream model she's had a moderate success but she's not a high fashion model.

 

So the fact that some of you are surprised that she stuck her ass up for papparazzi is hilarious. ?

 

19 hours ago, xvols said:

 

Emily Ratajkowski -  boat before lunch in Mykonos 01/07/2018

 

 

>> https://streamable.com/4viqw

 

 

56 minutes ago, frenchkiki said:

If she only decided to really do porn for real, she -at least according to me- will do something interesting.

Not with that new body

And if she fucks like she dances she is also going to be bad at it.

I’m not even talking about being a glamour model vs high fashion. (Do glamour models get invited to the met?) Her antics, thirst traps and obvious need for attention is weird. She’s sexy she doesn’t have to writhe all over a boat on all fours for attention. She’s starting to come off as a desperado, she doesn’t get sought after gigs or covers she was literally in Greece to open a shopping center. We obviously like her for different reasons and I think a lot of her followers are content with drooling over her. I still believe she can do better than she is but lbr she won’t 

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

^

 

hahahaha

 

I think she's more of a socialite/periodic model.  She needs to stay relevant

 

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

 

You all forget Emily has to keep showing the goods and posting pictures like this in order to advertise herself for the possible suitors who might like to purchase her 'company' when she goes to these different locations and events.

Emily Ratajkowski - out and about in Paris 07/03/2018

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view  Image hidden for guestsSign in to view 

IG
Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

23 hours ago, pizzarat said:

I’m not even talking about being a glamour model vs high fashion. (Do glamour models get invited to the met?) Her antics, thirst traps and obvious need for attention is weird. She’s sexy she doesn’t have to writhe all over a boat on all fours for attention. She’s starting to come off as a desperado, she doesn’t get sought after gigs or covers she was literally in Greece to open a shopping center. We obviously like her for different reasons and I think a lot of her followers are content with drooling over her. I still believe she can do better than she is but lbr she won’t 

 

Agreed. 

 

There's a turning point where more does not equal better and she's reached it. Most glamour models look tacky as hell, because all they're selling is sex. But Emily actually photographs really well and her facial features would fit high fashion shoots too. I really don't get why she doesn't utilize that quality more because imo that's what sets her apart. Or could set her apart. Instead she's putting her butt in the air for attention and taking the same damn selfies over and over and over again. It's sad. 

 

The whole butt in the air thing worked for Jessica Alba because back then, she basically had the best beach body out of everyone. She jumped on that glute train a decade before it became cool. But Emily, even though she has big boobs, doesn't really have a body that looks better than that of other lingerie and swimsuit models. And her posing for the paps is so blatant, it's off-putting. Well, to me anyway. She sort of cheapens herself, which is completely unnecessary. 

 

 

59 minutes ago, Expresso said:

 

The whole butt in the air thing worked for Jessica Alba because back then, she basically had the best beach body out of everyone. She jumped on that glute train a decade before it became cool.

 

Jessica Alba was already well known before that; she was considered one of the most (actually, the most) hot latin stars.  She starred in a TV show prior to that and was doing movies, and also appearing in celeb media as a beauty queen (before the maturing of the internet).

5 hours ago, LameImpala said:

You all forget Emily has to keep showing the goods and posting pictures like this in order to advertise herself for the possible suitors who might like to purchase her 'company' when she goes to these different locations and events.

quite so

3 hours ago, Cult Icon said:

 

Jessica Alba was already well known before that; she was considered one of the most (actually, the most) hot latin stars.  She starred in a TV show prior to that and was doing movies, and also appearing in celeb media as a beauty queen (before the maturing of the internet).

Oh yeah I'm not disputing that Jessica had already made a name for herself, but the paparazzi bikini pictures really skyrocketed her popularity. (Though to be honest with her I don't think she posed intentionally; she seemed really uncomfortable with all the attention she got for her looks.)

Emily is also pretty well known (though not for the same thing Jessica was up to that point) but the same move from her (which in her case is definitely intentional) is not gonna make an impact because:

1) her body simply isn't that great compared to other hot models and

2) social media these days has basically everyone parading their looks around, so there's a lot more competition. 

 

 

@Expresso you said that more eloquently than I could but those are my exact thoughts. Her body was hotter 20 pounds ago and tbh she doesn’t seem like a nice person at all. Insecure yet vain and stuck up. Marc Jacobs’ husband made a joke about her needing to borrow money bc she was flying coach (on a 2 hour flight, the horror!) her replies were LMAO such an activist queen!!! 

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

 

Emily Ratajkowski - the Vogue Foundation Dinner at Palais Galleria in Paris, France - Jul 3, 2018

 

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view   Image hidden for guestsSign in to view   Image hidden for guestsSign in to view   Image hidden for guestsSign in to view   Image hidden for guestsSign in to view   Image hidden for guestsSign in to view   Image hidden for guestsSign in to view   Image hidden for guestsSign in to view   Image hidden for guestsSign in to view   Image hidden for guestsSign in to view   Image hidden for guestsSign in to view   Image hidden for guestsSign in to view   Image hidden for guestsSign in to view   Image hidden for guestsSign in to view   Image hidden for guestsSign in to view   Image hidden for guestsSign in to view   Image hidden for guestsSign in to view   Image hidden for guestsSign in to view   Image hidden for guestsSign in to view   Image hidden for guestsSign in to view   

@pizzarat I really like you.

The problem with EmRata and her desire to have an acting career is that she is unwilling to pay her dues.

At least based on some comments she made.

But almost no actress gets to start out in a dream role.

Charlize Theron had to pay her dues in movies like "Children of the Corn III" and "Mighty Joe Young".

By contrast, Emily got a small role in a movie that was considerably better, "Gone Girl".

Someone like Margot Robbie turned a role that was not much bigger than that in "The Wolf of Wall Street" into an Oscar Nomination just four years later.

Inexplicably, EmRata's first big role as a lead was in something as horrendous as "We Are Your Friends".

I'm not one to judge, but I thought I would throw my 2 cents in since I've watched her career since that Carl's Jr commercial way back. She kind of seems like she believes all the great things people have told her over her career and maybe assumes she can "phone it in" to higher levels of success. But instead, it just comes across as tacky, or desperate. It's kind of like when someone gets their Lamborghini painted in bright pink; it's a Lamborghini it doesn't need anything else to attract lots of attention.