September 22, 201014 yr Author Sure some down here in certain parts take keeping it all in the family a little too literally 'like dey did in dem royal days', but I hope its photoshop .
September 22, 201014 yr Author 4 Votes Needed. Not sure whether I'll be here to put up the next so I'd rather just put it up now and give the scores together I guess ... You may have noticed that there was a little talk from UK, Prettyphile, Phenobarbie and myself over what the limit score is. But as to scores, this brings me to the final thought and or the summary of this round . Final Thought David Hasselhoff (known also as the Hoff) to my surprise and to the surprise of many was the first one booted from "Dancing With the Stars" on Tuesday night. He didn't have the lowest scores (not even in the bottom 3 of lowest scores) and wasn't the worst, but just like that his run for that shimmering trophy is over. Dancing with the Stars being one of the highest rated shows in the world and the Hoff also being one of the most popular and famous television actors in the world and probably the most famous in the group on a universal scale. He's been on several popular shows over the last thirty years such as The Young and the Restless, Baywatch and Nightrider and most recently of course a short stint on another reality titan America's Got Talent and is also a big recording artist in Germany. So how is it on a show with some girl from the Laguna Beach or something, some guy from Jersey Shore that refers to himself in the third person and Sarah Palin's daughter the Hoff is the first to go? Sure he's had some rough spots in there, but no one's perfect and he seems to have moved on and his daughters love him as they showed by giving their support in the front row of the audience, saying that they were the ones that convinced him to come and that they were proud of him for doing so well on those old knees. But maybe its just a reminder that you just can't win em' all I guess. There are athletes in every sport that never win the coveted title of their sport (whether it be World Cup, Super Bowl, World Series, Championship or what have you). But the difference is in sports you have fans, yes, but you win by the merit of the team's effort. Dancing With the Stars is a team effort of course (you and your instructor are a team and you work hard together to achieve the same goal), but you win by popularity or vote instead, so in theory someone of a lower calibre has a greater chance than they would in sports of course. But that's what its all about, an alternate world where what the average person wants supercedes all else and there's nothint wrong with that as its why the show and shows like it are so popular. But either way, I thik the Hoff is a great guy and will be just fine. He's still living his dream as a recording star in Germany, he has two daughters that love him, his shows are doing well in syndication and there are plenty reality shows in the sea, keep your head of Hoff, keep your head up, you're a winner to me and that is my final thought . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Round 9
September 22, 201014 yr Round 8 - 4 (she is sexy as hell, but yeah, no much of hips) Round 9 - 2 Joe, I think it should be better to wait till the last round is over and then reveal a new round, so it can be all clear and nice, or?
September 22, 201014 yr Round 9 - Based on those pics, a 4, but it's quite hard to give an accurate score with so few pics, they are treacherous many times, they are not what they seem. Round 8 - 4 (she is sexy as hell, but yeah, no much of hips) This is another picture of round 8 girl, not the current one... If that is not a 12 out of 5... At least you gave her a good 4, cause other people... <_<
September 22, 201014 yr People voting so harshly in this comp 4, -0.5 for the fugly tramp stamp = 3.5
September 22, 201014 yr Gonna point something out that none of you seem to be taking into consideration. These girls aren't being judged on normal standards of pretty, or the norm for what is considered a body. They are all models/actresses leading ladies in their chosen field so their body/beauty should reflect that. So while a 2.5 would be average in a normal competition with normal people, the standards of beauty are quite high when you're already judging something that is considered beautiful. I personally have had 1 starting at normal and going up from there as I doubt most of these girls have a below average body. As for the limited number of pictures the reason I brought that number up with Joe is because it keeps bandwidth usage to a minimum, gets the point across and because some of these girls just don't have more body shots. Maybe they're a new model or actress, or body shots just aren't in high demand for their field... So to each their own in how they vote, but let's stop with the disparaging comments and keep to it with having fun in the spirit of competition 3
September 22, 201014 yr Pic removed Also perhaps of people didn't pic bad pictures to vote on, it might make it a little easier to actually vote on them rather then guess about something that may, or may not be there. Shitty pictures, low score. Awesome pictures that do the woman justice.. good score. Hey guys it's just that simple... shocker isn't it? @Pheno, Barron, LS & Joe - Three of whom should be playing WoW about now! 40 days till Cataclysm! @ Pheno & Barron - Boyfriends new video. Cataclysm Beta - Worgen Female
September 22, 201014 yr ... but let's stop with the disparaging comments and keep to it with having fun in the spirit of competition What disparaging comments?
September 23, 201014 yr Author Round 9 - Based on those pics, a 4, but it's quite hard to give an accurate score with so few pics, they are treacherous many times, they are not what they seem. The main reason I was persuadable to go down to 4 is initially it was 5 at a time and too many would have taken up so much space that the average person might subconsciously not weigh each equally, but I changed it to 1 at a time at the last minute when Pheno showed me that mathmatically the original format would take over 2 years and since not many nominated anyway, I figured more pics would make them doubly not nominate. But the biggest problem with me with editorials and photoshoots of the 21st century/00s is photoshop. Women with no hips have hourglass figures, women with pooches have flat stomachs, they make legs longer, arms tighter and everything inbetween. When you see the untouched next to the touched its almost scary what goes on now. :| Joe, I think it should be better to wait till the last round is over and then reveal a new round, so it can be all clear and nice, or? Sure it would be ideal, but at the time I figured I wouldn't be able to get on to put up the next round otherwise (and it turned out to be so) and I promised a new round for every 24 hours initially and averaged 20 per 24 hours before the last round and after averaging 13 per 2 days and 12 per 1 day in the commercial comp didn't want to run the risk of losing voters now that I have 20 . Although of course due to the bandwidth issues it set me back anyway . Gonna point something out that none of you seem to be taking into consideration. These girls aren't being judged on normal standards of pretty, or the norm for what is considered a body. They are all models/actresses leading ladies in their chosen field so their body/beauty should reflect that. So while a 2.5 would be average in a normal competition with normal people, the standards of beauty are quite high when you're already judging something that is considered beautiful. I personally have had 1 starting at normal and going up from there as I doubt most of these girls have a below average body. As for the limited number of pictures the reason I brought that number up with Joe is because it keeps bandwidth usage to a minimum, gets the point across and because some of these girls just don't have more body shots. Maybe they're a new model or actress, or body shots just aren't in high demand for their field... So to each their own in how they vote, but let's stop with the disparaging comments and keep to it with having fun in the spirit of competition 3 Great point. In the context of judgeing them on a specialized scale for their peers, 0.1-1 makes sense because if they are a model or eye candy based celeb its a different scale from a regular person . I think the confusion is when someone looks at that scale and assumes its an all inclusive scale and are like "if a swimsuit model is a 0.3 what is Rosie Odonnel? But if they know its a separate scale they won't ask that. As for myself on the other hand, my scale is a mix of the two. For my scale, a 3-5 for a model or celeb is the exact same standard for 'regular' people, because the top tier everyday women I've seen are on the same level with famous women to me. Whereas on the other hand, average for a model or a celeb known for their looks is better than the standard of average for an everyday woman and the average woman would probably want to have. So yeah, lets enjoy . @Pheno, Barron, LS & Joe - Three of whom should be playing WoW about now! 40 days till Cataclysm!@ Pheno & Barron - Boyfriends new video. Cataclysm Beta - Worgen Female Great clips . Although I feel inner turmoil as a part of me is touched that you think I can do that and another part wonders if you actually knew how awful I was at video games would you regret you knew me . 1.5Too skinny, IMO Welcome . And, ironically, she's the thickest that's been so far , which means, could you vote in the previous rounds too if you don't mind . Because if the lowest scorers just hit and quit it gives the others unfair advantage .
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.