Bloodshot

Virgin alert!!

You said it far better than I could or did. The only thing that I'll add is that I have no problem with content creators charging fans for early access to something, this is very common with Youtubers. Many of them use Patreon also and they'll charge an early access fee for videos, sometimes it's just 24 hours, a few times I've seen it up to a month. Sometimes they also have "exclusive" content, but from what I've seen that's almost exclusively "extras", not their core video product. If photographers were using Patreon in a similar way I don't think many would complain. Especially since content with a small digital footprint, i.e. overall file sizes, will ALWAYS get leaked at some point. Trying to create a business model that fights that is like fighting gravity after a while.

I'm not stealing anything and I don't care one way or the other if anyone else is either. I'm talking about the fact that trying to keep content like this behind a paywall is a totally futile exercise and I gave you examples as to why. Plus "theft" of a digital item that you would never have paid for is NOT the same as theft of a physical item where someone is out the cost of those goods. Which isn't to say that theft is ok, just totally different circumstances. Instead of being an ideologue making straw man arguments, maybe you should think about what I've said a little deeper.

You can put your head in the sand all you want, but again, this is 2020 and the internet does exist. I for one have zero interest in ever paying a model for her content no matter how "hot" I may think she is. In the past models actually worked with agents and managers and found paying jobs that were then supported through advertising campaigns, magazine sales, website clicks, etc. instead of gouging their "fans" directly. Just like the music industry changed, and the movie/tv industry changed, I don't feel even slightly bad for someone who refuses to use a business model that works in the modern world and hiding basic content like this behind a paywall isn't that model.

Nobody gets a "high" from posting content, what kind of ridiculous projection is that? It's no one else's fault that you pay for content that yo don't have to but your own. Putting content like this behind a paywall in 2020 is an exercise in futility, it's just not a viable business model. It's kind of like the music industry 20 years ago when everyone was refusing to license content digitally, so then Napster rose up and they all realized that if they didn't get on the bandwagon they were screwed.

Don't tell me you're another one of those confused about how the internet works...

It seems like she needs to find a new career if she's can't get paying jobs through her Manager/Agent/Agency and has to resort to gouging her fans directly. I just don't get it.

She looks the same as always, other than sucking her stomach in for that pose

Is it more than these? https://imgur.com/a/bDKrk

Because it's 2020 and expecting to keep content like that behind a paywall is an exercise in futility. Join the modern world and build a business model that works instead of going against the grain.

All of the sets are exceedingly easy to find searching on google.

No skin off my back if you don't believe me, just contributing to the conversation.

Haha, because she didn't say it in a random media appearance I just made it up? I've actually known her for a couple years, along with a few other models here in LA, so I have no need to make anything up. Open relationships aren't exactly something new or groundbreaking around here.

Do you think that's really something she's going to talk about publicly in an interview?

Haha, pretty sure it's not!

Dating off and on, aka an open relationship from her perspective.

Lol, or not

5'9" or 5'10", depending on the source.

It's completely out of touch with modern society that she insists these photos not be "shared". Her expectations are unreasonable and thus the business model isn't viable. It's not our fault as consumers that she can't seem to figure out how to monetize her career like every single other model on the planet. I think Genevieve is gorgeous, and I like the work she's done, but at the same time I think it's somewhat offensive the way she expects her "fans" to compensate her directly instead of building a career the way every other models seems to be able to do.

I agree, she's looking hot again after looking too skinny for my tastes too.

You and me both.

I love the moving goalpost here. Overpopulation in regard to economic status is an entirely different discussion and not at all what you were claiming before. But I don’t think most really want this conversation to pollute this thread. There’s already very little Genevieve content recently.

Is that a troll standing on his chest?

That's been an issue off and on in this thread for a while by a few parties...

Yep, i read a post about that UNICEF report a few months ago. However, you continue to make a logical fallacy stating a possible projection as fact. Even UNICEF stated Africa's population COULD reach 4 billion by 2100, that "could" is an important word. Also, that projection comes from a single UNICEF report and there is a lot of debate about the viability of that projection for many reasons. Even UNICEF states that it's only one possible outcome over the next 80 years.