Bloodshot

I'd like to see also, why not post it here?

Hard to believe she has 2 kids!

I don't really get the Chrissy hate either. Her body painting pics from a couple of years ago were amazing!

I think that's pretty much a fact at this point!

Try this site... http://savevideo.me

Um, why does this policy exist? It's seems like it's the antithesis of what should happen. Shouldn't we be linking to original sources and crediting where images originate from? Otherwise it's just another form of piracy... What is Hotlinking? It is posting an image from one website onto another one, such as BZ. This not only steals bandwidth from original site, but also may result in broken links overtime (empty posts & etc), an increased server bill for the original site, and potential legal issues. That's the whole point, original contact SHOULD come from the originating site. They SHOULD be paying for the bandwidth and at the same time they SHOULD be collecting any advertising revenue based on click throughs to their site. The policy that's been enacted in regard to this flies in the face of copyright law and basic rules of data aggregation. A site this size, with this many members, that I assume has some type of revenue generation model should be very careful, because as the policy currently stands it opens up whoever owns and operates the site to copyright infringement suits. Basically, the rule of thumb for any site that's considered an aggregator, be it news, images, etc., is that a link to the original source be included and any images or text that are then displayed on this site should be linked directly back to their original location. This is long, but explains everything... http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/09/whats-the-law-around-aggregating-news-online-a-harvard-law-report-on-the-risks-and-the-best-practices/ This site is considered a User-Curated Aggregator. Check the best practices at the bottom of the article, those are what a site like this should be following. Items number 3 and 4 I think are the most applicable to this situation... "Best practices If you are the creator of a news aggregation website, what should you do to protect yourself against lawsuits? Short of licensing all of the content you use, there are certain best practices that you can adopt that are likely to reduce your legal risk. 1. Reproduce only those portions of the headline or article that are necessary to make your point or to identify the story. Do not reproduce the story in its entirety. 2. Try not to use all, or even the majority, of articles available from a single source. Limit yourself to those articles that are directly relevant to your audience. 3. Prominently identify the source of the article. 4. Whenever possible, link to the original source of the article. 5. When possible, provide context or commentary for the material you use."

Um, why does this policy exist? It's seems like it's the antithesis of what should happen. Shouldn't we be linking to original sources and crediting where images originate from? Otherwise it's just another form of piracy... What is Hotlinking? It is posting an image from one website onto another one, such as BZ. This not only steals bandwidth from original site, but also may result in broken links overtime (empty posts & etc), an increased server bill for the original site, and potential legal issues. That's the whole point, original content SHOULD come from the originating site. They SHOULD be paying for the bandwidth and at the same time they SHOULD be collecting any advertising revenue based on click throughs to their site. The policy that's been enacted in regard to this flies in the face of copyright law and basic rules of data aggregation. A site this size, with this many members, that I assume has some type of revenue generation model should be very careful, because as the policy currently stands it opens up whoever owns and operates the site to copyright infringement suits. Basically, the rule of thumb for any site that's considered an aggregator, be it news, images, etc., is that a link to the original source be included and any images or text that are then displayed on this site should be linked directly back to their original location.

Um, why does this policy exist? It's seems like it's the antithesis of what should happen. Shouldn't we be linking to original sources and crediting where images originate from? Otherwise it's just another form of piracy...

From Instagram... http://scontent-b-pao.cdninstagram.com/hphotos-xaf1/t51.2885-15/10533390_809159769150402_1360053930_n.jpg Please textlink or upload images onto a host instead of hotlinking. This include images from facebook, instagram, pinterest, tumblr, twitter, VK, etc. For more information click HERE. Thanks! ~post edited by PinkCouture

http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Charlotte_McKinney "She is rumored to be a rookie in the 2015 Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue."

I think Candice is gorgeous. But she has nothing to do with this year's issue, so we can't discuss her! ;-)

I think you said it all in those last few sentences, look at your behavior. Again, what is it about discussing this model that makes you so hostile? If you don't like her ignore it and pay attention to posts about models you do like. Trying to dictate who can discuss whom on here is pretty pointless. Also, trying to bait me into a fight is pretty immature and doesn't do anything but make you look worse.

What's irritating is the arrogance around here that certain people's opinions count over others. Just because YOU don't like her means no one else can discuss her? Nice "logic"...

I think Cult is getting a bad rap in here. Charlotte is pretty amazing looking and could easily be an SI model if they wanted her. I don't quite get why some people are so annoyed talking about her. Obviously she has some sort of "it" factor to be generating attention around here... Nope, one person just keeps bringing her up and people respond, because that's what people do on the internet. How's Frisco these days? My point exactly, if people are responding continuously there's something there. However you kind of glossed over the main point, why so much hostility for talking about a beautiful girl that could easily be an SI model?

I've never really understood Kate Upton's appeal, but Charlotte... WOW!

I think Cult is getting a bad rap in here. Charlotte is pretty amazing looking and could easily be an SI model if they wanted her. I don't quite get why some people are so annoyed talking about her. Obviously she has some sort of "it" factor to be generating attention around here...

Better than Bar's body ever was IMO!

I don't quite get the Playboy reference either. Charlotte looks pretty amazing to me, blows Kate Upton out of the water IMO...

I made one comment about the use of that word and pretty got hostile, you may want to double check the context there...

Since when did it become a hipster thing to dislike "frisco"? LOL I grew up here, my family has been in SF for the better part of 200 years, no local would be caught dead calling the city "frisco"! Because the whole "my family has been here for over 200 years" doesn't sound like a snobbish thing to say at all. Sniffing farts doesn't make you cool, it just makes you weird. Do you even understand the words you're using? I'm not sure you understand what snobbish means...

Since when did it become a hipster thing to dislike "frisco"? LOL I grew up here, my family has been in SF for the better part of 200 years, no local would be caught dead calling the city "frisco"!

You can't know the area too well if you refer to SF and "frisco"! :yuckky:

No, there is on hotter Bar! I used to agree with you, I'm not so sure anymore!

So I think the real questions is she the hottest Bar now...?

She's being picked up by a "motorcycle" taxi service that's available in LA (motorcycle is in quotes because it's really a trike). The service is advertised towards celebrities and high profile people who want to be able to leave a venue and dump the paparazzi.