Bloodshot

Which girl is that!? Damn!

I always thought Bar Refaeli was the hotter of Leo DiCaprio's ex girlfriends, I may be changing my mind!

I'd love to see Gen and Charlotte McKinney compare. Imagine that sight!!

Not a chance that's Charlotte...

I have to agree with others, anyone who thinks Charlotte's boobs are fake is either blind or is probably a virgin who has never seen or felt real boobs in person. From the shape and the way they move there's zero question in that regard, they're definitely real.

That's a scooter, not a motorcycle!

Except she's underage, I felt like an old man when I looked that up...

The real question is who has a hotter body... Alejandra or Emily Ratajkowski?

Why do you think she has gone from 7 pages in November 2014 to 21 pages in March 2015? ... I think it's her whole look--not the most beautiful face, but great eyes and a pretty face; nice legs and figure, and then, eh, yes. The rest of that figure. It's the boobs...

you meet them? if you did how are they(nice, friendly, cocky, rude, etc)? I have to admit I'm always confused why people care about how an entertainer comes across to the public in one of these situations. Until you actually meet them one on one in a relaxed situation away from the public you can never really know who or what they are...

Lol, you're convinced Kate Bock's boobs are real? You do know that real boobs don't look like perfectly round balls, right? They're not frankentits like Samantha Hoopes, but Kate's are FAR from real...

I would love to see Kate Upton's face if the two of them were ever nude in a dressing room together. Can you imagine the jealousy from Kate and her saggers?

So you're saying the predominantly obese South is still pushing for fat acceptance and wants to see fat models also? What a shocker!

About 3 years worth I'm totally lost on the hate also...

It's not, it's the same uptight weirdos who say this every year. I remember when Bar's cover was "controversial"...

I think that's a naive view of how the industry works and especially SI. With digital photography they take literally thousands of pictures of the girls now and the job of a model is partly to know what works for you but to also follow the photographers directions. She had literally zero choice in the shot used.

Bingo!

It's not the first time a model has been pulling her bottoms down. I personally don't even pay attention to uptight responses like that.

This bit actually makes me like her more. Personally I have a problem with this attitude and it's not about my personal preferences of what I find attractive or not. Being fat is NOT healthy, the fat acceptance movement is NOT healthy. As a country and as a culture we should embrace fitness and health, not fat and not overly skinny. It greatly saddens me that culturally we accept extremely unhealthy lifestyle choices just so we don't hurt people's feelings.

Already a bad sign of wondering these kind of things I'm sure she will do well, just like last year and average years. The real question is if she'll sell more than the usual years and be like say Kate Upton or Marisa Miller which are both known to be the best-selling issues in the last decade Again, I don't see how this could go wrong, it's Sports Illustrated all you need is a hot girl in a bikini and they delivered, I'm sure 99% of guys who buy the magazine every year per tradition give zero fucks about who is in the cover as long as they get that. I had heard that Bar Refaeli's cover outsold Marisa's and was the best selling of the decade until Kate, is that not true?

So I'm guessing Bar won, the only question is by how much...

I doubt that's the cover, they wouldn't blow their load, so to speak, showing pics of Nina if she was on the cover also.

If you're getting threatened that someone could take you to court over something, then it's probably indicative that images/content released is not intended to be viewed earlier for good reasons. I'm pretty sure somewhere it was mentioned that even with other brands they have requested BZ to remove things because they don't want people to see it beforehand. Legal threats ≠ actual legal ground to stand on, but it's not my site. The mods here already have a policy where content is not supposed to be linked back to the original sources, which opens them up to copyright infringement every single day. As someone who's very familiar with copyright law, it's quite amusing.

The paranoia around here cracks me up. There's already massive amounts of copyrighted content posted on here that's not credited to it's original source. Posting leaked pictures from SI won't change that one way or another.Yes posting content that is officially released without credit is fine seeing as how it's everywhere. But posting leaked stuff that isn't anywhere else is a huge risk. A huge risk to what? There's absolutely no difference legally.

The paranoia around here cracks me up. There's already massive amounts of copyrighted content posted on here that's not credited to it's original source. Posting leaked pictures from SI won't change that one way or another.