Jump to content

Bloodshot

Members
  • Joined

Everything posted by Bloodshot

  1. Lol, or not
  2. 5'9" or 5'10", depending on the source.
  3. It's completely out of touch with modern society that she insists these photos not be "shared". Her expectations are unreasonable and thus the business model isn't viable. It's not our fault as consumers that she can't seem to figure out how to monetize her career like every single other model on the planet. I think Genevieve is gorgeous, and I like the work she's done, but at the same time I think it's somewhat offensive the way she expects her "fans" to compensate her directly instead of building a career the way every other models seems to be able to do.
  4. I agree, she's looking hot again after looking too skinny for my tastes too.
  5. You and me both.
  6. I love the moving goalpost here. Overpopulation in regard to economic status is an entirely different discussion and not at all what you were claiming before. But I don’t think most really want this conversation to pollute this thread. There’s already very little Genevieve content recently.
  7. Is that a troll standing on his chest?
  8. That's been an issue off and on in this thread for a while by a few parties...
  9. Yep, i read a post about that UNICEF report a few months ago. However, you continue to make a logical fallacy stating a possible projection as fact. Even UNICEF stated Africa's population COULD reach 4 billion by 2100, that "could" is an important word. Also, that projection comes from a single UNICEF report and there is a lot of debate about the viability of that projection for many reasons. Even UNICEF states that it's only one possible outcome over the next 80 years.
  10. Might want to rephrase that to be "Africa's biggest problem going forward in the 21st century MIGHT be overpopulation". That's far from an issue in most of Africa right now. Also, 4 billion would be a big jump considering they're "only" at 1.2 billion now.
  11. You guys are kidding right? In the year 2019 anyone who expects their content to not be shared everywhere is deluding themselves. The business model Genevieve is trying to use in this case just isn't viable or reasonable.
  12. Why would you think she has implants? She seems to have a virtually identical body type to her mom, who doesn't have small boobs. Her boobs also seem to go up and down in size as her weight fluctuates, based on her shoots. There's nothing about her that would even make me think has implants.
  13. Agreed, no other model’s thread has this type of negativity. I’m not sure why it exists here, but it’s tiresome.
  14. Are you guys blind? Her lips are exactly the same as they always have been. Sometimes she just wears makeup to accentuate the size.
  15. Do you not understand how the Internet works? Expecting published works to not get posted online, legal or not, is a fool's errand.
  16. Despite the hate on here, I think Emily is HOT, but she's also short for a model, especially a runway model. Very few, if any, of the current Victoria's Secret girls are under 5'9".
  17. Bingo. Different cultures do have different values. I know that's hard for many younger Americans to fathom anymore.
  18. Sadly I think she had to, she lost some weight, but not enough to explain that big of a difference...
  19. You sure seem to put a lot of effort into posting negative comments about a model you obviously don't like for some reason. What's the point in the constantly negativity? It makes this thread a lot less enjoyable for others.
  20. Picture doesn't load...
  21. Agreed! haha
  22. Why? What about dancing is possibly degrading?
  23. I still don't understand. How is twerking vulgar or degrading? It's a girl shaking her booty... Also, I don't remember seeing anyone say anything about it being empowering for women one way or another. I'm happy to live in a world where women are free to dance in any way they like, and express their sexuality in any way they like, we all benefit.
  24. Wait, a girl doing the splits and dancing with friends is somehow being equated to porn? Are you for real!?
  25. Schemer is right, that site is essentially a rag. I would never use it as a source of any information.