I guess you're right :trout:

THIS girl looks so gorgeous...

I hope it doesn't end up being Chrissy Teigan or something...That would be a let down

This is Jessica Gomes--not Chrissy, not Petra

^ NO WAY that can be Jessica Gomes. Most obvious indication of this is the size of her chest on the pic in question....Jessica has much BIGGER boobs then that. And her facial symmetry does not correspond to that of Gomes.

Funny enough, it looks more like Petra then Jessica herself.

^ NO WAY that can be Jessica Gomes. Most obvious indication of this is the size of her chest on the pic in question....Jessica has much BIGGER boobs then that. And her facial symmetry does not correspond to that of Gomes.

true but Jessica Gomes is in the issue too

dont forget to record the Letterman Show tomorrow guys lol

Don't shoot me for saying this but, I think Candice Swanepoel will be perfect for SI.

No worries, i don't do the whole "shoot the messenger" bit

Don't shoot me for saying this but, I think Candice Swanepoel will be perfect for SI.

but of course love Candice

Don't shoot me for saying this but, I think Candice Swanepoel will be perfect for SI.

Candice with her darker hair would be perfect for si imo

and two days! I kinda just wanna find out who got the cover already

Don't shoot me for saying this but, I think Candice Swanepoel will be perfect for SI.

Candice with her darker hair would be perfect for si imo

and two days! I kinda just wanna find out who got the cover already

just one day! to know that and two days the rest of the pics

I know the most expected cause of the years is Anne, but I have a little suspicion that it may be Kate :brows:

I want Candice to stfa from SI, enough with VS torturing me with her already

^ I'm split....not sure if I would want her there or not?

Boydywise yes...but surley there more to SI then that...or am i just a fool to think so

Sorry, I don't really see her for SI at all maybe I've just been over inundated with her in the last few years, but she just seems so stretched recently. Maybe back in the day when she first started VS and she was the little snowbunny, curvy in all the right places without looking hard and kinda fake it was one thing, but now I just don't see her pulling it off. At least not to my liking. She's got no tits without a VS pushup cleavage maker, and no ass without a painfully arched back, that would give even Karlie or Anja a poppin' backside.

Nina Agdal twitter:

Heattt!!!!!! Then bedtime, garage again tomorrow and then NY!!

Looks like she's going to be at the Letterman show

Nina Agdal twitter:

Heattt!!!!!! Then bedtime, garage again tomorrow and then NY!!

Looks like she's going to be at the Letterman show

cross fingers! hope is like that!!!

Sorry, I don't really see her for SI at all maybe I've just been over inundated with her in the last few years, but she just seems so stretched recently. Maybe back in the day when she first started VS and she was the little snowbunny, curvy in all the right places without looking hard and kinda fake it was one thing, but now I just don't see her pulling it off. At least not to my liking. She's got no tits without a VS pushup cleavage maker, and no ass without a painfully arched back, that would give even Karlie or Anja a poppin' backside.

THIS!

SI is the last magazine/modeling job that is still taking healthy/curvy girls at this point. Having Candice there would be completely against what SI represents IMO. Just look at the SI girls: Brooklyn Decker, Bar Refaeli, Kate Upton, Jessica Gomes, Damaris Lewis, Jessica White ... They all have naturally curvy bodies. Even Irina Shayk has a pretty decent looking butt without doing creepy posing, SI is the place of T&A & Candice does not belong in there.

I would die if i ever see Candice in SI, that would be a sad day

^They do have curvy models on the mag indeed, but they also featured Cintia Dicker before and she is very petite so Candice wouldn't be that bad in that respect.

But even i must agree that Candice would be iffy...just doesn't settle well 100% here for me.

Cintia Dicker may be petite, but her body is proportionate. Marisa Miller is also petite, but she's got curves in the right places without aid to magnify them well beyond what they actually are. I guess the best way to put it is most of the women they've featured who are on the more petite side are accurately represented as such, while still being 'curvy' insomuch as they can be. Candice isn't really curvy beyond an over exaggerated hip to waist ratio. She really has no backside, and her top half is incredibly disproportionate to her lower half, or so it seems in most of her pictures and video.

Sorry, I don't really see her for SI at all maybe I've just been over inundated with her in the last few years, but she just seems so stretched recently. Maybe back in the day when she first started VS and she was the little snowbunny, curvy in all the right places without looking hard and kinda fake it was one thing, but now I just don't see her pulling it off. At least not to my liking. She's got no tits without a VS pushup cleavage maker, and no ass without a painfully arched back, that would give even Karlie or Anja a poppin' backside.

THIS!

SI is the last magazine/modeling job that is still taking healthy/curvy girls at this point. Having Candice there would be completely against what SI represents IMO. Just look at the SI girls: Brooklyn Decker, Bar Refaeli, Kate Upton, Jessica Gomes, Damaris Lewis, Jessica White ... They all have naturally curvy bodies. Even Irina Shayk has a pretty decent looking butt without doing creepy posing, SI is the place of T&A & Candice does not belong in there.

I would die if i ever see Candice in SI, that would be a sad day

+1 on that, part of the reason SI is so popular. and these are both very good points