October 12, 201113 yr Terese Pagh Teglgaard [9]Romee Strijd [3]I'd probably go with what Theron said earlier - we wait for maybe 50 rounds to pass, and then make the losing model available for nomination again. It'd be a nice way keep the game going indefinitely and it wouldn't involve scrapping all the past statistics. I think it'd be a shame just to start from scratch after all this time.
October 12, 201113 yr Terese Pagh Teglgaard [10] Romee Strijd [3] Can someone create a new round please
October 12, 201113 yr I'd probably go with what Theron said earlier - we wait for maybe 50 rounds to pass, and then make the losing model available for nomination again. It'd be a nice way keep the game going indefinitely and it wouldn't involve scrapping all the past statistics. I think it'd be a shame just to start from scratch after all this time.I think we should do it this way too. The only thing we need to do differently is have the 'models who cannot be picked' list to be a chronological list of the last 50, instead of a big alphabetical list
October 13, 201113 yr I'm really loving all the input thus far. We finally have what looks like a good way to restart this comp without having it come to a complete stall considering models would be put back in after 50 rounds. But i think 50 is a bit much. I was thinking more on the terms of 30 rounds, but of course others input on that would be greatly appreciated.
October 13, 201113 yr It seems the most people feel comfortable with this last theory ok, so I´m gonna do that, the only thing I need to know is how many rounds - 20, 30, 40 or 50? don, we can have two lists - one of the last 50 (or 30) and exactly the same one in alphabetical order, so people would not have to search through it all
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.