Jump to content
Forum Look Announcement

Featured Replies

right. 

But Lui is a nude magazine. 

why agree to sign a contract where the models state there will be no nude pics, then?

 

Blame the mag, not the model. 

 

Don't say: yeah, we're fine with it, and then force the model to go against what she agreed upon. 

 

I assume it was the MAG that INVITED SARA to pose. not Sara that begged to do so. 

She agreed under special conditions, they sign the contract. 

 

There is only one at fault here and it's the mag

13 minutes ago, protowalkoffame said:

Come on "Lui" is a nude magazine , not a fashion magazine , if you want to pose with cothes on don't pose for "lui" ! I'm very angry against model who decided to pose for "Lui" , "playboy" or "Treats with clothes on , If you want to not pose nude you have plenty magazines , but please don't pose for nude magazines if you don't want to be nude !!!!

 

Wait, let me fix that for you...

 

“Come on, Sara is a fashion model, not a nude model. If you want someone to pose without clothes on then don’t ask a fashion model. I’m very angry about nude magazines who agree to have fashion models pose with clothes on. If you want nude models, you have plenty of models, but please don’t ask a fashion model to pose clothed if you don’t want want her to pose clothed.”

11 minutes ago, xoxorae said:

 

Wait, let me fix that for you...

 

“Come on, Sara is a fashion model, not a nude model. If you want someone to pose without clothes on then don’t ask a fashion model. I’m very angry about nude magazines who agree to have fashion models pose with clothes on. If you want nude models, you have plenty of models, but please don’t ask a fashion model to pose clothed if you don’t want want her to pose clothed.”

 

a lot of fashion model pose nude , fashion model and nude artistic model are often the same ! If you don't like nude photos you refused to pose , Coco Rocha is against nudity and sexy and she respect the fan who like nudity like me because she said no, she don't try to pose for "lui", "playboy" or doing fake nudity ... When a magazine do nudity offer you a cover , you said no thank-you and you don't do the magazine , but she tried to earn money and said yes , it's not correct !

2 hours ago, Englund said:

right. 

But Lui is a nude magazine. 

why agree to sign a contract where the models state there will be no nude pics, then?

 

Blame the mag, not the model. 

 

Don't say: yeah, we're fine with it, and then force the model to go against what she agreed upon. 

 

I assume it was the MAG that INVITED SARA to pose. not Sara that begged to do so. 

She agreed under special conditions, they sign the contract. 

 

There is only one at fault here and it's the mag

Preach it 

1 hour ago, protowalkoffame said:

 

a lot of fashion model pose nude , fashion model and nude artistic model are often the same ! If you don't like nude photos you refused to pose , Coco Rocha is against nudity and sexy and she respect the fan who like nudity like me because she said no, she don't try to pose for "lui", "playboy" or doing fake nudity ... When a magazine do nudity offer you a cover , you said no thank-you and you don't do the magazine , but she tried to earn money and said yes , it's not correct !

She said yes because LUI AGREED to not do nudity. Don't try to spin it, Its Lui's fault without a doubt.

2 minutes ago, gotportugal said:

She said yes because LUI AGREED to not do nudity. Don't try to spin it, Its Lui's fault without a doubt.

 

nop

^ Oh, such a strong argument!!

:rofl: 

 

2 hours ago, gotportugal said:

She said yes because LUI AGREED to not do nudity. Don't try to spin it, Its Lui's fault without a doubt.

 

Indeed!

Don't lose your time arguing with that troll...

Just have a look at the crap he has posted in other threads and you'll see it's absolutely not worth it.

3 hours ago, gotportugal said:

She said yes because LUI AGREED to not do nudity. Don't try to spin it, Its Lui's fault without a doubt.

Exactly. This is on Lui 100% because they could have bounced out of the agreement the second they saw no nudity but instead chose to continue to pursue the shoot. And it wouldn't surprise me if Lui probably agreed because they thought they'd get away with pressuring her into posing nude with their stellar argument of "well you've done it before". It's sad that this kind of thought is still so prominent, and also why it's so important that Sara spoke up.

Lui is a nude magazine is not 100% true, Alessandra did a shoot with them and since she doesn't want to do nudity you can barely see her ass naked

but the worst thing is how they treated her on set, disgusting

and is not like she wanted to do a shoot where she's fully dressed, you can do a nude and sexy shoot without showing your intimate parts

5 hours ago, Stormbringer said:

^ Oh, such a strong argument!!

:rofl: 

 

^ They are playing strong with their troll game! :pinch::p 

10 hours ago, protowalkoffame said:

Come on "Lui" is a nude magazine , not a fashion magazine , if you want to pose with cothes on don't pose for "lui" ! I'm very angry against model who decided to pose for "Lui" , "playboy" or "Treats with clothes on , If you want to not pose nude you have plenty magazines , but please don't pose for nude magazines if you don't want to be nude !!!!

 

Welp, you sure did find the wrong side of this argument.

 

If Lui's brand is strictly nudity (it isn't, but for argument's sake), they protect their brand by not signing contracts like this in the first place, not by making legally binding agreements they intend to break.

18 minutes ago, ILUVAdrianaLima said:

 

^ They are playing strong with their troll game! :pinch::p 

I'm shook.

7 hours ago, peroxideblonde said:

Lui is a nude magazine is not 100% true, Alessandra did a shoot with them and since she doesn't want to do nudity you can barely see her ass naked

but the worst thing is how they treated her on set, disgusting

and is not like she wanted to do a shoot where she's fully dressed, you can do a nude and sexy shoot without showing your intimate parts

 

anyway Lui is bullshit , normally it's not a fashion magazine it's a nude mag so if she doesn't want to pose no need to choose her for a shoot ! For me nudity is nudity and we must show private part but with taste , when you're not showing it's tastefull, sexy, but not nude ! But Lui do not respect their fans , we want nudity not the crap they published , so Sampaio or Ambrosio are toos much prudish , so why they decided to let her pose !!!

7 hours ago, peroxideblonde said:

Lui is a nude magazine is not 100% true, Alessandra did a shoot with them and since she doesn't want to do nudity you can barely see her ass naked

but the worst thing is how they treated her on set, disgusting

and is not like she wanted to do a shoot where she's fully dressed, you can do a nude and sexy shoot without showing your intimate parts

 

Ambrosio has done nudity and first topless in a video this year , wake-up and I was really happy to see her breast finally , I'm tired of fashion bullshit !

Sara went to a basketball game with Lais, Jo and Jasmine :smile: She also went to go buy makeup with Jas.

1 hour ago, protowalkoffame said:

 

Ambrosio has done nudity and first topless in a video this year , wake-up and I was really happy to see her breast finally , I'm tired of fashion bullshit !

 

Babes, you're in the wrong site :Amelie_wft:  http://bfy.tw/1ij

I know VS makeup line is sketchy (to say the least), but it's so cool that Sara's got a lipkit for herself O:) #KylieJennerwho

6 hours ago, Sazz_s said:

I know VS makeup line is sketchy (to say the least), but it's so cool that Sara's got a lipkit for herself O:) #KylieJennerwho

Sketchy?? How?

6 hours ago, Sazz_s said:

 

Babes, you're in the wrong site :Amelie_wft:  http://bfy.tw/1ij

 

Nudity is not porno again , for me Playboy in the middle of 80's and in the 90's is ther perfect exemple of nudity , I like nudity , not porn, Why always the same comment that confuses porno and nudity, nudity is an art, it's not porn! Full frontal nudity = not porn !!!!!  Prudish and ridiculous society who confuses art and vulgar  !

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.