July 26, 20178 yr On 8.7.2017 at 0:56 PM, a said: ELLE Russia, August 2017 ELLE RUSSIA AUGUST 2017 without text PARIS 16th ARRONDISSEMENT 1980s PHOTOGRAPHER: NICK HUDSON STYLING: VADIM GALAGNOV HAIR: OLIVIER LEBRUN MAKE UP: KATHY LeSANT NAILS: LORANDY qualityfashionphoto.com
July 26, 20178 yr 3 hours ago, bandit55 said: Eh, she was pretty close to being nude in Lui. There really wasn't that much left to the imagination. It's kinda silly imo. Like if you're going to expose 99.5%, might as well show the other 5% too I don't think it matters what was left to the imagination, it's how Barbara feels personally about being nude. I understand, and that's really her choice no matter how frustrating it is. On a more positive note for Barbara, I understand why she'd be embarrassed and want the photo taken down, but at least she did this professionally. It's one thing to have an unpublished nude from a photoshoot floating around the internet but something else entirely if she were the victim of a hacking. I only hope that this is a mild embarrassment for her and that she can find a way to get passed it.
July 26, 20178 yr 1 hour ago, twopercentsuccess said: I don't think it matters what was left to the imagination, it's how Barbara feels personally about being nude. I understand, and that's really her choice no matter how frustrating it is. On a more positive note for Barbara, I understand why she'd be embarrassed and want the photo taken down, but at least she did this professionally. It's one thing to have an unpublished nude from a photoshoot floating around the internet but something else entirely if she were the victim of a hacking. I only hope that this is a mild embarrassment for her and that she can find a way to get passed it. there are a lot of job where you can be prudish , but come on she's a model, if she wants to be prudish she can be a seller or a baker !
July 26, 20178 yr I didn't believe this at first, but wow, poor Barbara her personal line has been crossed and I hope she is okay. hopefully no other photos get released
July 26, 20178 yr She apparently posed willingly for the nude shot as part of the shoot. Surely the only issue is around the editing and granting of permission for publication in the Love magazine issue. There is always a chance of outtakes being leaked, so, if you want to eliminate that risk don't pose naked in the first place. Having said all that I personally think the photo in question is lovely and further enhances her beauty and appeal.
July 26, 20178 yr 6 minutes ago, m1sterss1pp1 said: . There is always a chance of outtakes being leaked, so, if you want to eliminate that risk don't pose naked in the first place. mmmm no...the problem here is that the LOVE MAGAZINE promised Barbara nipples will not show . she trusted them... thats why she agreed on posing nude. the photo was supposed to be with some type of censored in the nipples. People here commenting: ugh Barbara get over it .. why u pose naked then? why u did lui?...... lol .... its ALL about the agreement that she and the magazine had.
July 26, 20178 yr the problem is not just about showing the nipples. its about respect an agreement or contract . Barbara liked this:
July 26, 20178 yr 3 hours ago, protowalkoffame said: there are a lot of job where you can be prudish , but come on she's a model, if she wants to be prudish she can be a seller or a baker ! This is a very fucked up logic to have.
July 26, 20178 yr ^^this 15 minutes ago, MarVS said: the problem is not just about showing the nipples. its about respect an agreement or contract . Barbara liked this:
July 26, 20178 yr Or… She got swept up by the atmosphere during the shoot and then regretted it once the picture was in print… Thinking what would her family members think of it especially if they had not been happy with her increasingly risqué shoots (Lui, Maxim, Love Advent)
July 26, 20178 yr 5 hours ago, twopercentsuccess said: I don't think it matters what was left to the imagination, it's how Barbara feels personally about being nude. I understand, and that's really her choice no matter how frustrating it is. On a more positive note for Barbara, I understand why she'd be embarrassed and want the photo taken down, but at least she did this professionally. It's one thing to have an unpublished nude from a photoshoot floating around the internet but something else entirely if she were the victim of a hacking. I only hope that this is a mild embarrassment for her and that she can find a way to get passed it. I agree. I feel bad for her if she wanted that to remain private only for her boyfriend or something like that. But at least she can take solace from the fact that it’s an artistic picture for a fashion magazine and many other top models have posed topless (such as Adriana Lima) and a lot of them have done shots that are way more sexual in nature (such as Lais Ribeiro, all the models who posed for Terry Richardson and Pirelli). Her picture is beautiful and she should not be embarrassed about her breasts if she has a hang-up about showing her nipples. And she can keep her topless picture count in just one. A lot of models have several. Doutzen Kroes has even posed bottomless! And from now on, she knows to always insist on just implied nudity on set. I remember TMZ got a video of Kate Upton’s GQ shoot where she was topless on a horse. TMZ censored it but I think it was leaked without her permission. Never do more on a shoot than you are comfortable with, the images change hands so many times that there can be leaks!
July 26, 20178 yr It could be anything at this point but I always thought nudity is firmly agreed upon in the contract (is there even a contract), especially since Barbara is a well established model. 3 minutes ago, Sanni said: Doutzen Kroes has even posed bottomless! Doutzen has done fully naked shoot before.
July 26, 20178 yr 1 minute ago, Schemer said: Doutzen has done fully naked shoot before. Yes, that’s what I meant. Showing her “landing strip.”
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.