Enrico_sw
Members
-
Joined
Everything posted by Enrico_sw
-
-
Femme Actuelle, 18 May 2020
-
Rania Face 10 Body 9 Walk let's say 7 Career 6 Naomi Face 7 Body 8 Walk 7 Career 7 Ariel Face 8 Body 7 Walk 7 Career 6 Emanuela Face 8 Body 7 Walk 8 Career 9
-
Maggie Rawlins Beauty 6 Sexiness 8 HFV 7 Mass Appeal 6 Likability 7 Noor Schauten Beauty 7 Sexiness 6 HFV 5 Mass Appeal 6 Likability 7 Olga Kurylenko Beauty 9.5 Sexiness 8.5 HFV 7 Mass Appeal 7 Likability 8
-
Yup, sure did. And as I said, you spiced it up, which is good
-
Jasmine Tookes Valeria Rudenko Celine Farach Alina Kirchiu
-
He's thinking "I've got hairy legs" right now Even his "native american" rival Warren loves him for that
-
Yes, it's clear. It's the way I voted. BTW, thanks for adding new rules like this one, it adds some fun Actually, I'm having second thoughts... I think I might've been too generous (even if I don't like Rosie either). So, if you allow me to change my vote , I'll have this strategic vote you talked about, and I'll say "no one".
This guy is nuts, but he's "song material"
These types of sauces are for meat (typically veal). Well, I guess one of the best solutions would be to do a black pepper sauce with mushrooms. You cook your mushrooms (cut them in relatively small pieces), then add your meat. A the end of the cooking, you add some Cognac and you flame it. When the flames are done, you add the demi-glace sauce that you have already mixed with black pepper. Let it cook for 1 or 2 minutes, then it's done.
The intransitivity (I was sure we'd have some discussion about it at some point ) means that the choices of the rounds have an importance on the outcome (even when you do successive random matches to try to get more representative results). If A beats B, and B beats C, sometimes A doesn't beat C. For example, if Rosie wasn't in the list, I would've said "no one", because I believe Emily can't beat anyone else, but my choice means she's Tier 12 (which is quite generous, I have to admit.... ) Unclear. I think he asks for our opinion (and it's easier than to read other people's minds). @Mousematt You set the rules, so let us know what's the best interpretation
I guess it depends on the voters and they aren't always the same. Also, the intransitivity plays a role in competitions with one-to-one rounds. BTW, we're supposed to vote on our personal opinions not on the prediction of how other people would vote So, that's your opinion and I respect it, but I have another one.
Juliana Herz Beauty 7 Sexiness 7 HFV 5 Mass Appeal 5 Likability 5 Keri Russell Beauty 10 Sexiness 9.5 (Keri has the inner sexiness ) HFV 6 Mass Appeal 8.5 Likability 8.5 Leomie Anderson Beauty 6 Sexiness 7 HFV 7 Mass Appeal 5 Likability 6
That's what I was gonna say, but then I saw Rosie Huntington-Whiteley... She's the only one Emily "could" beat (let's say it would be close to a draw).
@Mousematt Interesting idea. It's good to spice things up like this from time to time. It reminds me of non-transitive games and the Condorcet paradox. Elections are often good cases of intransitivity (I could ramble on for hours on this topic, so I will stop right now )
