Enrico_sw

@Stromboli1 These ones are for you!

@Matt! She's great too. I really like her voice. She has a little lisp, but I find it quite sexy.

I guess it's also because there are less checks and balances. People don't know where the limits are anymore. 20 years ago, she would've never done that, not because this particular person wouldn't have had the urge to do so, but because she would've known that the rest of us wouldn't have allowed it.

Unfortunately, yes.

You should post it in her thread, she is gorgeous. I can't find a lot of her editorial or pictures, it seems she doesn't have much work (or maybe I'm a lot lazier than I used to be )

Emily Didonato Lais Ribeiro Taylor Hill Barbara Palvin

Alexina Graham Beauty 10 Sexiness 10 HFV 9.5 Mass Appeal 5 Likability 9.5 (She has a great personality; she's funny, witty and sexy. Also, I really like her voice) Alina Kirchiu Beauty 9 Sexiness 8 (She tries too much IMO, she could be a lot better) HFV 7 Mass Appeal 7 Likability 6 Amy Adams Beauty 9 Sexiness 8 HFV 2 Mass Appeal 8 Likability 8 Yes

@Matt! I'm preparing my next thread about a redhead French actress. I'm sure you'll like her. I don't know if I can do that this afternoon, but stay tuned In the meantime, here's some music

Yep, just rambling on stuff. You should try it, rambling is good for your health: the WHO approves of this message

Larissa Huber, 25 May 2020

Femme Actuelle, 25 May 2020

This guy says everything and its opposite. https://www.nationalreview.com/news/zuckerberg-calls-for-clear-regulatory-framework-to-counter-chinese-internet-censorship/ https://reclaimthenet.org/zuckerberg-defends-censoring/ https://nypost.com/2020/05/07/facebooks-new-supreme-court-looks-like-a-license-to-censor/ https://telecoms.com/503783/facebook-doubles-down-on-covid-19-censorship/ I guess it's not so surprising coming from a guy that backstabbed his college friend...

This one is the worst https://www.dezeen.com/2020/04/22/livable-well-distance-being-covid-19/

The curve of Covid cases is decreasing in many countries, but, at the same time, the curve of absurdity is rising spectacularly https://www.businessinsider.fr/us/burger-king-debuts-social-distancing-crowns-in-germany-2020-5 https://www.dezeen.com/2020/05/21/veronica-toppino-social-distancing-hats-design/

This is disgusting and probably totally useless: https://www.businessinsider.fr/us/remote-controlled-face-mask-worn-while-eating-2020-5

https://fee.org/articles/youtube-to-ban-content-that-contradicts-who-on-covid-19-despite-the-un-agency-s-catastrophic-track-record-of-misinformation/ Youtube bans content that contradicts the WHO. I feel so much more protected now that youtube gives the monopoly on truth to an entity that: - denies the existence of Taiwan (BTW, one of the most efficient States in terms of fighting the covid ) - said that masks were not efficient, but then said they were - said that lockdown was useless, but then said it was compulsory - etc. BTW, i's OK to be wrong on issues, nobody knows everything. That's why we have freedom of speech

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/04/what-covid-revealed-about-internet/610549/ So great. I feel so safe when the Internet is censored by Big Tech. Freedom of speech is useless, there's only one voice that matters, because freedom is slavery and the Ingsoc is love. "Big gender-fluid sibling" is watching you and that's wonderful........

^ Apparently the same feminist harassed a 14 year-old kid on social media. She posted his name and pictures of him. What's wrong with this woman? Even if this kid said bad things, he's still a kid and she harassed him. She made her mum beg her for mercy. That's terrible. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8299249/Feminist-writer-Clementine-Ford-divides-opinion-posting-photo-14yo-boy.html

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8351483/Feminist-writer-Clementine-Ford-says-coronavirus-isnt-killing-men-fast-enough.html I guess that feminists are the new tyrants in 2020. They can say whatever horrible and toxic things they want and they always get a free-pass.

Hollywood (and the industry in general) doesn't know how to make movies about pandemics. Their plots are never realistic and they overestimate the capacities of research (you can't find a cure against a disease in a couple of days, yet that's what we see in many movies). They should make an historical movie on Pasteur. Much more insteresting and it would give hope to a pessimistic population.

Yep, me too. I would build a particle physics research facilty and launch a big fucking space telescope. Apparently, Mrs. Bezos got $35 billion, so half of it is 17.5. The LHC in Geneva cost around $7-8 billion, let's say that would be my research investment. Then, I would use the rest of the money to set up a satellite company (a satellite is between $50 and 400 million and I have lots of idea for thriving opportunities). That would be my business investment. Over time, when the satellite company has become very profitable, I would reinvest my money in a big space telescope (not as expensive as Hubble - based on what I know of the technology, I think with $6 billion I could build a beautiful beast). So, that's settled.

Taylor Hill Clara Alonso Vika Bronova Elsa Hosk

Alejandra Alonso Beauty: 9 Sexiness: 9.5 HFV: 8 Mass Appeal: 7 Likability: 7 Alison Brie Beauty: 8 Sexiness: 10 HFV: 5 Mass Appeal: 7 Likability: 7 Brittni Tucker Beauty: 7 Sexiness: 8 HFV: 9.5 Mass Appeal: 7 Likability: 7

You mean these nutjobs? https://collider.com/justice-league-snyder-cut-is-a-bad-idea/ Interesting to see their crocodile tears