The exact (and uncut) sentence is the following:
Which is then completed by:
It's pretty clear that a) it's about soliciting votes (a guy offering gift, food and drink to influence the vote) and b) poll officers should provide self-service water. The media has been quite disingenuous by twisting the purpose, which then instill confirmation bias in people when they read it.
Well, the solution of this could be to build more polling places. Did Joe propose this?
Don't you think it's a little bit caricatural and a big distortion of what is actually written? It's a section about soliciting votes.
Also, some journalists say they're against this section... and then use it to discard ALL the law. That's sophistry (hasty generalization). Let's say they are right and this section should be changed, it doesn't change the fact that the main point of the law is voter ID. Voter ID should be the basis of a sane democracy. This diversion on one section is quite disingenuous IMHO.