frenchkiki

I've seen the pictures of Gisele little boy and i found them cute. I know they are stolen pictures but if u think about the context: A mom at the beach with family it's just normal. Having papz taking pictures of them is the not normal thing. And focusing on the little boy naked and make it a joke is stupid. I have pictures of me or my sister or brother naked at the beach just like the ones with Gisele boy. Not taken by paparazzi of course! But by my mom or my dad. And i look at them with tenderness because it was a time of innocence and today is a perverted time. A simple innocent thing as a kid on a beach is turning into something nasty. Pedophiles have enough awful things on the net to have an interest in Gisele baby boy or girls on tasteless lingerie commercial.

^I don't know, I think it's part of VS's new strategy: the viral marketing campaign... The Showstopper® - does exactly what it says, to be fair. I am pretty sure I see a micro penis.

No I did not. But I am going to have a look Oh and I know Laetitia is not smoking and she never smoked. I don't know about Emily tho?

that's just a bad picture. She actually one of the few i like most with less make-up.

The best Cover with a Model Vogue Brasil June 2009 - Isabeli Fontana --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The best Cover with an Actress Esquire Mexico August 2010 - Odette Yustman (by donbot) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The best Pose L'officiel Brazil December 2010 - Isabeli Fontana 1.5 s/n Volume 13 - Renata Sozzi 1.5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The most original Cover Xl Semanal June 2009 -Charlize Theron --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The best Group Cover Vogue UK 1990 - Linda & Christy

Anna Christine Speckhart she is the most beautiful among the 3

gnrjngorjnklùwfbnik<rfnikng!

To answer to Pheno I am totally agree with you about how wrong it is to sell sexy lingerie for children (or make-up). We all know when a woman is buying lingerie is most of the time to seduce. Seduce herself or a sexual partner. Lingerie for little girls is a complete distorted message & this commercial is just a stupid provocation made by hypocrites. They knew these pictures will never be accept by the general public but they give it a shot. I mean why been lost in so many brands for children when they can give one good strike? I think the Vogue editorial with the little girls is different. At first they just wanted to do a shoot with girls dressing like mom, wearing make-up and high heels. They wanted to talk about how young is too young to wear make-up and such for kids? But it came out all wrong. The kids were over sexualized and I don't even know why Vogue published the pictures? (bad publicity is still publicity for them I guess?) <_< I seriously think the whole world is fucked up and the line between what is correct or not was been crossed a long long time ago by almost every countries. Fashion industry is always going to push the limits because unfortunately it's all about money and not the children. And that's so wrong. & to quote my 6 years old niece words of wisdom talking about this kid lingerie and she shown me what the "like that" was at the same time she was saying it epic cuteness And about the Beauty Pageants to me is also just all wrong. On different levels and for other reasons but it's really disturbing for me to see those little girls wearing bikinis and waxed face and fake smile. I don't like it and it freaks me out. To LMS: I am sure u don't think that way about French. I will kill u if u do and i'll eat you!

This should be focused on the advertisement not the country. But unfortunately it's always one country pointing the other country to tell how despicable it is. When they should swipe in front of their door before to swipe our door. U know that I have absolutely now animosity against America & Americans but your medias when it comes to foreign countries is made with 99% of sensational craps! If I was Americans I would think French are pedophiles always on strike burning cars in riots and drinking wine for breakfast. And women are thin well dressed sluts not shaving their under arms and legs and they want to dress their little girl like mini sluts. Oh And French don't shower bien sûr! Of course it's a cliché but how many Americans are believing those clichés? I would say too much.

Ok guys I don't want to have a fight with any of you and I totally agree it's a sick campaign! This is totally wrong. As this Is also totally wrong. This lingerie campaign for little girl in France is to me as much a pedophile dream than the 5 years old beauty pageants in USA. I really understand that you are disgusted/shocked by this but this is just a sick buzz for the media to talk about this lingerie brand. We have harsh laws to protect children in France and this campaign is not going to last long. They did their big scandal with the pictures & medias are playing their sick game. Now we are talking about it all over the world & they are promoting their products for free! I don't want to give lessons to anyone but no country on this bloody planet is better than another and this comment is just contemptuous. It's a big attention in France right now and we are outraged as much as Americans could be about the little girls pageants? I am not living is the US for now so I don't know how Americans react to 5 years old little girls in bikinis wearing enough make up to pimp a stolen car? But I live in France and i know this campaign a big big scandal. I know this is not a France/Usa debat but I just want to clear things about my county. The French fashion world and France are 2 different things. Weird people are making the fashion & real good people (and a bunch of idiots!) are making France. And if they don't vote for Sarkozy again in April 2012 I would say the idiots are gone!

Amber Valletta Her facial bones structure, her eyes, her flawless skin, her smile, the shape of her lips, everything scream "model" to me. Even after 22 years I am still amaze by her beauty.

To me this picture says: the models with sunglasses & make up are the vain ones! They are so many models i don't like (Not especially on this picture but in general) but if they are models if because they have that "something special". There was a -blessed- time when models were actually beautiful with or without make-up and without photoshop. To meet Claudia Schiffer or Cindy Crawford or Laetitia was a close encounters of the third kind for me (back in the 90's) they were just breathtaking beautiful. What u were seeing on magazines was the truth. "What u see is what u get!" Today I think it's different, most of the famous models are of course extremely pretty but for some of them the make-up and the digital retouching are their best friends. I maybe going to sound silly but for me a model must be more beautiful than the the pretty girl in the street we look because we think she is lovely. And that's not the case for A LOT of models today. I see so much more beautiful girls in the street (or in my own family) than in the magazines. And the OVER use of photoshop make me think that "Ah! Lara Stone is a freak! I knew it!" but I have enough common sense to know she is surely more beautiful in the flesh even if I don't really like her. The" ideal" of beauty is completely distorted because of digital retouching & it's totally human to think models are only beautiful with make-up and a good light & a good photographer & PS... (as I previously said some famous models really need it IMO) But we know it's not always true! We like to watch these "no make up"pictures because it makes us feel better about ourself "Good God! Is that Catherine McNeil?" I look so much better on my ID picture!" But... now that I think about it, i do not have her "cat eyes" & her amazing bone structure! Models are supposed to be perfect (and according to the among of fanatics fans) some of them are. But they are not. If i talk too much let me know and I'll shut up! (well not really )

A5. Katie Cassidy A6. Odette Yustman B5. vs Emma Stone B6. Jessica Lowndes C5. Jessica Alba C6. Megan Fox D5. Olivia Wilde D6. Zoe Saldana E5. Marion Cotillard E6. Milla Jovovich F5. Amber Heard F6. Charlize Theron G5. Sophia Bush G6. Ashley Greene H5. Natalie Portman H6. Evangeline Lilly

But do u have a scanner?? If u answer is "no" GO GET ONE! damnit!

but on the Laetitia picture u can clearly see how red her eyes are with tiredness (she is not the only one on those Vuitton pictures). I must admit that I don't like this picture at all but models are also humans (really? ) and they sometimes look shitty! & Laetitia looks so beautiful in real and with zero make-up so i forgive her. & Emily Didonato she is so young and she has the perfect skin. It's so unfair for the "older" models around her

Allo??

And it's also depends of all many hours they sleep the night before? For the Vuitton fashion show (the pictures u posted ABBFabs) those pictures were taken at dawn so they look all really tired and puffy! Laetitia no make up Puffy at Vuitton! not puffy! make up - tried to post something with no photoshop to me she looks gorgeous with or without make-up. Except on that Vuitton one!

Not Stephanie. The name of this model Sibyl Buck. oh, i know Sibyl, lovely 90's model but she didn't pop out in my mind at all!!! i've seen Sibyl with lots of hair colors, but never blonde as far as i recall...she was a very good looking girl too, but never noticed such similarities to Steph as much as in this pic...thanks for clarifing this is not Stephanie neither Sibyl. Don't remember the name of that girl. She was often in French Glamour and vogue Italy in the 90's. U should ask an ID on ... TFS Sibyl is such an underrated model, she was a beauty

i am sure it was funny^^

E3. Mary Elizabeth Winstead vs Emmanuelle Chriqui E4. Marion Cotillard F3. Amber Heard F4. Angelina Jolie G3. Sophia Bush G4. Keira Knightley H3. Malin Akerman H4. Evangeline Lilly

I think it's this picture? I don't want to be sue so I am hiding the object of the scandal. original picture Is it inappropriate for a 15 years old girl? Yes it is. was the photographer wrong to take this picture? I think yes. Was she forced to do it? well I hope not! and Since her parents seem to be so protective they certainly approved this picture and certainly signed a contract with the photographer? I am just wondering why is wrong now when it was apparently ok 1 year ago? Maybe not earning money from the tshirt sales is the problem for them and the age of Hailey just a pity excuse? Oh and i see no pubic hair (only the shadow of the shorts) and even with a super magnify glass i see 0 portions of her breasts! But it's true I am not a lawyer trying to make money on... nothing. Bad publicity for a so young model.

Yes, she has an edit in French ELLE SCREENSHOTS (small) By the way It's cool she can work for another Lingerie brand especially a so much better one than VS...

Er... i'd like to start a new thread for the "sports Illustrated" February 1995 issue but as the "SIS" thread are pinned in the important topics in general babe discussion I cant start a thread in this section (important topics) Make a forum please!

thank you. I won't start her thread tho. She is not that pretty after all to much surgeries to look good. Don't like it.

no do u love to dance?