She was just on E! news for Pirelli. That must have been what she was doing a couple of weeks ago.

.

In her nude Pirelli shot it was obvious she had implants but I haven't thought she looked like she had implants for as long as some people think. For instance when she did that GQ shoot with Palm leafs she still looked natural. So when do you think she got them?

 

According to her Vogue Paris that came out this month zero plastic.

 

Why do people insist making theire assumption complete fact. I mean seriously, you have absolutely no evidence and you basing things off of your subjective view. And to me it doesn't look like she has implants her boobs have always looked like that and they actually look smaller than before*but I think its because of the angle*

 

and this was in 2005. Unless she has said that, its best to not assume. Especially since Vogue Paris said there wasn't any procedures done. They wouldn't have said it if it wasn't true

.

^ I'm confused with why you brought up implants if you're not talking about the size? I don't see how "it's obvious she has implants" if you're not referring to size. Most of the times, women don't get them to remain the same cup size.

But either way, Adriana doesn't have them.

Let's just leave this here.

well, women get implants for many reasons MizB. The first one is the size, but a lot of times, it's for the shape too and for firmness.

 

anyways...love her pirelli pics this year and her first year. i only didn't like the shoot where she was pregnant.

^ I'm confused with why you brought up implants if you're not talking about the size? I don't see how "it's obvious she has implants" if you're not referring to size. Most of the times, women don't get them to remain the same cup size.

But either way, Adriana doesn't have them.

While I didn't see all of what Jim wrote, I suspect it's the shape, not the size, that makes him believe they are implants. Whether or not you believe they are, you should still be able to see why someone could think they might be.

Thinking a model's only consideration when it comes to implants would be whether or not she should look like Dolly Parton seems like a profound misunderstanding of the role of cosmetic surgery in multi-million dollar careers based on physical appearance.

There's a rumor that Kendall got Marc Jacobs, so I am pretty sure it is Adriana, Joan, Natasha, Karlie and her based on those pics Katie Grand posted awhile back: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2825358/Kendall-Jenner-Karlie-Kloss-Adriana-Lima-Joan-Smalls-Children-Need-high-fashion-makeover-model-new-charity-T-shirts.html

It's pretty obvious she has gotten implants. She was completely flat at 21 and not even one year later she filled her bikini a lot better out. I doubt you usually can grow them naturally at this age. However, I still think Adriana is one of the most stunning women out there with implants or without.

I don't think so. Adriana has one boob bigger than the other. You can tell. If she had implants then her breasts would basically be the same.

http://adrianalimafan.net/gallery/blue-man-2001-springsummer/

vs

http://adrianalimafan.net/gallery/rigy-2002-springsummer/

1999

 

 

 

Before both of those runways.

 

1998

 

1997

 

 

incase you think I am making up these years http://adrianalimafan.net/gallery/photo-france-1997-december/

 

 

and she was still a teenager. "completely flat before 21" I don't think so. Even at the vsfs 1999 it was evident to me she didn't have a flat bust.

 

like I said I think its best not so assume unless confirmed. Even though in Vogue Paris this month  it basically was. But no, if her breast don't as big or perky or identical  in different kind of bra's, bikini's, and in different angles its good enough to assume...

Any female who owns bikinis know how deciving they can make your breast size look, same goes for bras. It's all about how you tie them, how tight you tie, are the bikini tops padded, do you have a silicon wedges or cutlets in there etc. I have worn my share of bikinis that have made my boobs look bigger than what they are and some that made me look smaller. Let's not forget that bikini technology can change drastically in a short time span. Judging by the pics in the link Adriana def had some type of wedges/cutlets in her bikini tops and had the tops tied tight. Designers have to find a way to false advertise in real life as well.

Going by some of you alls logic, Adriana must have under went a breast augmentation during the 2003 VSFS...

Any female who owns bikinis know how deciving they can make your breast size look, same goes for bras. It's all about how you tie them, how tight you tie, are the bikini tops padded, do you have a silicon wedges or cutlets in there etc. I have worn my share of bikinis that have made my boobs look bigger than what they are and some that made me look smaller. Let's not forget that bikini technology can change drastically in a short time span. Judging by the pics in the link Adriana def had some type of wedges/cutlets in her bikini tops and had the tops tied tight. Designers have to find a way to false advertise in real life as well.

Going by some of you alls logic, Adriana must have under went a breast augmentation during the 2003 VSFS...

 

 

Or before every VSFS and every top less photoshoot she has done lol

Y'all are so dumb, clearly Adriana has some magical implants that she takes in and out whenever she feels like and she's had them since she was basically a teenager. And they are so magical and awesome that they even get bigger/smaller when Adriana loses/gains weight. No shit, it's a secret type of prosthesis only Adriana has

 

I love magical boobies

1999

 

 

 

Before both of those runways.

 

1998

 

1997

 

 

incase you think I am making up these years http://adrianalimafan.net/gallery/photo-france-1997-december/

 

 

and she was still a teenager. "completely flat before 21" I don't think so. Even at the vsfs 1999 it was evident to me she didn't have a flat bust.

 

like I said I think its best not so assume unless confirmed. Even though in Vogue Paris this month  it basically was. But no, if her breast don't as big or perky or identical  in different kind of bra's, bikini's, and in different angles its good enough to assume...

 

I'm pretty sure this discussion began in response to a recent, complete nude photo. That photos has some fairly common telltale signs of plastic surgery. That isn't confirmation, but it's not an outrageous observation, either.

 

I'm sorry if I don't put too much weight on a model denying that she's had work done; it's pretty par for the course.

TKC you made a good point but I don't look at professional shots for conviction. If you think these two are the same size ok.

http://i1.wp.com/adrianalimafan.net/wp-content/uploads/runway/triton-2002-springsummer/triton-2002-springsummer-112.jpg

 

http://i0.wp.com/adrianalimafan.net/wp-content/uploads/runway/richard-tyler-2001-springsumme/richard-tyler-2001-spring-1.jpg

http://i1.wp.com/adrianalimafan.net/wp-content/uploads/runway/patachou-2001-springsummer/patachou-2001-springsumme-12.jpg

professional shots from the 90's. I don't think they enlarged breasts through technology then. And most importantly she didn't have on a bra nor bikini for two out of those three photos.