March 6, 201213 yr Author ...What do you think?I like (Y)If I can make a suggestion though, how about taking averages rather than totals?Example:Model A = insanely popularModel B = moderately popularModel C = not well knownIn round 1, Model C is bound to pick up more votes by being put together with Model A than she would with Model B. If you took averages, then everything is scaled fairly and total number of votes don't matter <_<donny, but this competition is really about popularity - not the most beautiful or with the best body, but the most popular models on this forum right now, that´s why I took on the total number of points system through the whole competition.I could create groups where the most popular would be together with the not well known models in round 1 (where you have to rate every woman from 0 to 5) so they could gain more points - if it would work, dunno? Would it be more fair?How do you mean it with the averages? Tell me more, I can take it into consideration of course.
March 6, 201213 yr Dioni Tabbers Erin Heatherton [1] Isabeli Fontana [5] Josie Maran Magdalena Frackowiak [3] Zhang Ziyi [1] What do you think? Sounds good. Put me down as a yes.
March 6, 201213 yr ...What do you think? I like (Y) If I can make a suggestion though, how about taking averages rather than totals? Example: Model A = insanely popular Model B = moderately popular Model C = not well known In round 1, Model C is bound to pick up more votes by being put together with Model A than she would with Model B. If you took averages, then everything is scaled fairly and total number of votes don't matter <_< donny, but this competition is really about popularity - not the most beautiful or with the best body, but the most popular models on this forum right now, that´s why I took on the total number of points system through the whole competition. I could create groups where the most popular would be together with the not well known models in round 1 (where you have to rate every woman from 0 to 5) so they could gain more points - if it would work, dunno? Would it be more fair? How do you mean it with the averages? Tell me more, I can take it into consideration of course. I like the totals thing, but the point is that the Model C types pick up extra votes by being put in with Model A types, simply because there's more people voting in that group, which is a lesser reflection of their true popularity. It's probably better to group together models of equal popularity - A's with A's, rather than A's with C's. You'd get the best results with 1 model per round, but that would just take way too long and everyone would get bored. Either that or everyone at once, but that's not practical either I just thought with averages it scales all the results to more of an even playing field, with the most popular still scoring highly. I see what you mean about it taking away somewhat from the popularity angle though <_<
March 7, 201213 yr Dioni Tabbers 0Erin Heatherton 8Isabeli Fontana 0Josie Maran 0Magdalena Frackowiak 0Zhang Ziyi 2
March 7, 201213 yr Author ...What do you think? I like (Y) If I can make a suggestion though, how about taking averages rather than totals? Example: Model A = insanely popular Model B = moderately popular Model C = not well known In round 1, Model C is bound to pick up more votes by being put together with Model A than she would with Model B. If you took averages, then everything is scaled fairly and total number of votes don't matter <_< donny, but this competition is really about popularity - not the most beautiful or with the best body, but the most popular models on this forum right now, that´s why I took on the total number of points system through the whole competition. I could create groups where the most popular would be together with the not well known models in round 1 (where you have to rate every woman from 0 to 5) so they could gain more points - if it would work, dunno? Would it be more fair? How do you mean it with the averages? Tell me more, I can take it into consideration of course. I like the totals thing, but the point is that the Model C types pick up extra votes by being put in with Model A types, simply because there's more people voting in that group, which is a lesser reflection of their true popularity. It's probably better to group together models of equal popularity - A's with A's, rather than A's with C's. You'd get the best results with 1 model per round, but that would just take way too long and everyone would get bored. Either that or everyone at once, but that's not practical either I just thought with averages it scales all the results to more of an even playing field, with the most popular still scoring highly. I see what you mean about it taking away somewhat from the popularity angle though <_< So you suggest grouping A with A and C with C and B with B in groups - I can do this (I think) - how would you do it with averages? I mean, after one group is over, what and how would you count? Like the number of points given to each model / number of people who voted? I´m sorry donny, you have to explain it to me - my mind is not working right now, lol.
March 7, 201213 yr Author Dioni Tabbers Erin Heatherton [1] Isabeli Fontana [5] Josie Maran Magdalena Frackowiak [3] Zhang Ziyi [1] What do you think? Sounds good. Put me down as a yes. Great
March 7, 201213 yr Author RESULTS:Dioni Tabbers - 44Erin Heatherton - 73Isabeli Fontana - 97,5Josie Maran - 123Magdalena Frackowiak - 63Zhang Ziyi - 25,5Together with the points from the first round:Dioni Tabbers - 90,1 + 44 = 134,1Erin Heatherton - 83,6 + 73 = 156,6Isabeli Fontana - 106,6 + 97,5 = 204,1Josie Maran - 128 + 123 = 251Magdalena Frackowiak - 84 + 63 = 147Zhang Ziyi - 72,1 + 25,5 = 97,6it means that Erin Heatherton - 156,6Isabeli Fontana - 204,1Josie Maran - 251made it to the third round, and Dioni, Magda and Zhang are eliminated.
March 7, 201213 yr Author 2.ROUND IMPORTANT!! - Pretty had a great idea. You can post me new pics or videos of the women you nominated, if you like to. I will change it for anew - including this group, if you can send me new pics or vids of the noms from this first group til it´s closed, I will change it if not, nothing happens 2. ROUND GROUP 8 - 7.3.2012 Alessandra Ambrosio Karolina Kurkova Daria Werbowy Kate Upton Kim Cloutier Marloes Horst VOTING - Please, remember that you have 10 votes to split, no more. Give it to one or split it however you want, according to the likeness of the women. ANNOUNCEMENT - The voting will be stopped on 7th of March 2012, it means you have 2 days to vote. I will also put noticement about this competition to each woman´s thread, as in the previous year. Hope everything is clear, if there are any questions, feel free to ask me. VOTE: Split your 10 points amongst these women: Alessandra Ambrosio Karolina Kurkova Daria Werbowy Kate Upton Kim Cloutier Marloes Horst
March 7, 201213 yr So you suggest grouping A with A and C with C and B with B in groups - I can do this (I think) - how would you do it with averages? I mean, after one group is over, what and how would you count? Like the number of points given to each model / number of people who voted?I´m sorry donny, you have to explain it to me - my mind is not working right now, lol. It's okay I was just suggesting you do the A/B/C grouping if you want to continue with the totals - there's no need to do that with averages. In terms of how you do it with averages - exactly the same as you're doing now, but at the end of each group you just divide the totals by the number of votes. eg. Round 1, Group 1, 30 votes Alyssa Miller: 98.75 / 30 = 3.292 Ariadne Artiles: 54.9 / 30 = 1.830 Barbara Palvin: 94.5 / 30 = 3.150 Constance Jablonski: 52.9 / 30 = 1.763 Hailey Clauson: 70.6 / 30 = 2.353 Round 2, Group 7, 43 votes Dioni Tabbers: 44 / 43 = 1.023 Erin Heatherton: 73 / 43 = 1.698 Isabeli Fontana: 97.5 / 43 = 2.267 Josie Maran: 123 / 43 = 2.860 Magdalena Frackowiak: 63 / 43 = 1.465 Zhang Ziyi: 25.5 / 43 = 0.593 You can still add points together between rounds as before. Just a thought though. I'm cool if you just want to stick with totals
March 7, 201213 yr Alessandra Ambrosio 2.5Karolina Kurkova 2Daria Werbowy Kate Upton 3.5Kim Cloutier 2Marloes Horst
March 7, 201213 yr Alessandra Ambrosio Karolina Kurkova 4Daria WerbowyKate Upton Kim Cloutier Marloes Horst 6
March 7, 201213 yr Alessandra Ambrosio 5Karolina Kurkova 5Daria WerbowyKate UptonKim CloutierMarloes Horst
March 7, 201213 yr Alessandra Ambrosio 2Karolina Kurkova 1Daria Werbowy 0Kate Upton 1Kim Cloutier 0Marloes Horst 7
March 7, 201213 yr Alessandra Ambrosio Karolina Kurkova Daria WerbowyKate Upton Kim Cloutier 5Marloes Horst 5
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.