dizzymisslizzy Posted March 6, 2010 Share Posted March 6, 2010 72x3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dizzymisslizzy Posted March 6, 2010 Share Posted March 6, 2010 72x3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squeege Beckenheim Posted March 6, 2010 Share Posted March 6, 2010 73 x3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanessa_gxox Posted March 6, 2010 Share Posted March 6, 2010 1973 x 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
U.K. Posted March 6, 2010 Share Posted March 6, 2010 1972 x11973 x2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rox Posted March 6, 2010 Share Posted March 6, 2010 1973 x3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sagitario Posted March 6, 2010 Share Posted March 6, 2010 1972 x11973 x2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scarlettuberlover Posted March 6, 2010 Share Posted March 6, 2010 73 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prettyphile Posted March 6, 2010 Share Posted March 6, 2010 1972 x3- It's amazing how much the body standards of excellence have changed over the years. I found a diet candy... *blinks*... yes a diet candy commercial from back in the late 70's, early 80's, and in it woman mentioned getting back into a size 10. Now 10 is damn near a plus size lol wtf? . I think this woman along with these early SI models looked healthy and strong compaired to woman now who looked like they could be knocked over by a strong gust of wind. Seriously check it out... Ayds Candy lolololol10/10 for irony WIN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickiala Posted March 6, 2010 Share Posted March 6, 2010 1973 x3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siniko Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 73 x 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyGEN Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 1973 x3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dia Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 1973 x 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael* Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 '73 x3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fergetta Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 1972 x 11973 x 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suki_ Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 1973 x3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clauds Posted March 7, 2010 Share Posted March 7, 2010 73 x3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprinklesofcrazy Posted March 8, 2010 Share Posted March 8, 2010 73 x3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jennka Posted March 8, 2010 Share Posted March 8, 2010 73x3 Pretty, I´m still amazed by the difference and trying to sort it out in my head. I mean, the diversity is SO huge, now we have like woman with size 0 - 4 and that is "called" normal (amongst the models I guess, not normal people). What´s normal, then? I guess we are all different sizes and shapes, and that´s normal - however, people mostly won´t tolerate, because they are now used to see models of a size 0-2. Not all of them, of course. It´s complicated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Layla90 Posted March 8, 2010 Share Posted March 8, 2010 1972 x3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.