Jump to content
Bellazon

The Official Victoria's Secret Thread


Kevork89

Recommended Posts

That video proves what made VS spectacular in the past, the girls UNDERSTOOD how to move their bodies and sell sexiness.  
 

Look at EmRata in that video, she’s just standing there.  Of the new girls I actually think Paloma tried to do the best, the rest are literally doing nothing for the camera.  You compare this to the old what is sexy videos and you understand perfectly what VS tried to do here.  They just don’t make them like they used to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Clauds said:

Same, can't believe we're back here :rofl: 

 

That being said, they really should have kept this with the actual Icons: Naomi, Dri, Candice & Gisele. The rest are just meh and far from icon status anywhere

 

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

I think they included the other models for diversity and inclusivity purposes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It began when they dumped the VS Angels and started diversifying their models with different body types in an attempt to be more inclusive.  Also...

 

"On August 2, 2021, L Brands (NYSE: LB) completed the separation of the Victoria's Secret business into an independent, public company through a tax-free spin-off to L Brands shareholders."

 

I'm sure there were other contributing factors.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, john.smith said:

Looking at VS stocks

looks like business has not been good in past years.

vs.png

Because a lot of women are against believing their models are in drugs, anorexia, bulimia... Now, in obesity...

 

And It is clothes business, not all products can like to everybody.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That video is about six months old, so she was still pretty much post-partum, it's not photoshop. She's in her 40s and had a kid, of course it's gonna take a while for her to get back in shape :idk: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/13/2023 at 5:49 AM, john.smith said:

Looking at VS stocks

looks like business has not been good in past years.

vs.png

 

Very interesting. They went from 80$ to now close to 20... such a downfall.

 

What do analysts say about the causes of this downfall?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Siemgi said:

They missed the inclusivity shift (see Savage x Fenty...) and remained elitist/fantasy-driven for too long. Also their stuff is expensive

 

I agree. All this stuff they are doing comes off as being disingenuous, performative, and an attempt to be "woke". Their stuff are somewhat pricey but I believe another issue is often the quality doesn't match the price point. While they have increased their prices, the quality has declined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ the mismatch between quality and price seems to be a good argument. I can see why sth like this annoys the customers.

 

On the other hand, the "inclusivity" thing doesn't convince me that much. From a purely "marketing" perspective (meaning that we put aside any political views), it seems that getting woke divides the customers and sometimes bring up huge backlash (like for Budlight). :idk:

I can't see it as a good marketing strategy, but I'm not an expert of the lingerie market, so I'd be really curious to see what analysts said (even though sometimes, analysts don't know what they're talking about as well :laugh:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also don't understand the "elitist" argument. Don't the customers want to become a better version of themselves? Don't they want to dream about greater things?

 

(again, I don't know the lingerie market, so maybe there has been a shift and customers don't want that any more)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, Enrico_sw said:

I also don't understand the "elitist" argument. Don't the customers want to become a better version of themselves? Don't they want to dream about greater things?

 

(again, I don't know the lingerie market, so maybe there has been a shift and customers don't want that any more)

It's moreso that they don't (or didn't) carry that many sizes so people went to brands which they feel represented them better. They kept their target too small.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...