5 votes needed

3.5

2

bump 3 votes needed

Bump!

2.5 ? - sure is a pretty tummy .

Need one more vote.

2.5

Experiment over. Results, explanation and new round coming soon. /cackles

@ Joe I've been justified hardcore by how people have voted this round.... You'll see why. :evil:

Joe's always been a little fan of experiments, mishmashing bodies together to see if we'd notice, so I thought why not, let's follow in the footsteps of the creator of this thread and run a little experiment. Thanks in part to Pheno and her willingness to buy a book off of EBAY we found some pictures that have to my knowledge never been seen before; of a Victoria's Secret model. One of their main spokesmodels to be exact.

Now she happens to be in quite a few people's top 10 list, ranking somewhere near the top and yet because no one recognized the pictures and quite probably because she didn't look as plastic/photo-shopped/pushup bra'd/ubertanned/scoliosis backed/minus ten pounds as VS has the habit of making her look, and because none of you realized it was her, the results were quite surprising.

It just goes to show that as much as we all want to believe we aren't biased towards our favorites there is some underlying point where we do show a bit of bias. There was absolutely nothing wrong with her body other then she doesn't have much of an ass. Decent sized breasts, long legs, nice abs, toned and of a healthy weight... yet she didn't do well..... >.<

And in closing I reveal to you... a normal pictured

Candice Swanepoel

.

btw imo VS can fuck itself and stop making woman look like shit.

The pictures from ebay will be posted in the coming week.

Round 92 -

Candice Swanepoel

- 2.81

Round 93

Abs: .8 out of 1

Legs: .7 out of 1

Butt: .3 out of 1

Cleavage: .2 out 1

Overall: .4 out of 1

Score: 2.4

Lmao

5 for the pale skinny beauty!

Interesting experiment, but I don't think the chosen pictures were a very good representation of her body.. in particular her torso or her legs. Most people who judge/praise her body do so based on a wide variety of sources, from Photoshopped catalogue shots to candids, to videos.. so I'm not really sure I take your point

Can I also suggest that the pictures are not cropped so tightly, particularly the boob and butt shots? It's happened like that in a few rounds, and you really can't judge it in the context of the rest of the body

4.5 for current round

Butt: Looking at the butt, not the lowerback/legs

Cleavage: Looking at the breasts, not the ribs/waist/sternum.

Not sure why the pics would need to be cropped any other way.

But duly noted for the future *high-five*

I demand to be able to vote for the lowerback!

It's just so sexy. *licks*

I didn't see a problem with the cleavage shot, not only did it adequately show the cleavage the full length body shot showed the cleavage as well, and it wasn't bad cleavage. Don't be grumpy because you didn't like the final results.

Current round 2

I'm not the slightest bit grumpy. I'm not even talking specifically about the previous round.. like I said, it's happened in a bunch of other rounds too. Don't you think it's better to judge the 'body part' pictures better in context? It's easier to gauge overall curves and proportions when it's not so tightly cropped, that's all.

*votes for Pheno's lower back.*

10 out of 5

Where did you see my lower back o.0