if the photo wasn't supposed to be published and the magazine is out with it, that's a breach of trust.

in this case, all she can do is a legal procedure (maybe, if she wants to).

10 hours ago, Shepherd said:

 

Adds

(Remove the photos from your quotes people.)

https://www.bellazon.com/main/topic/49014-quoting-images-videos-updated-1013/#comment-3209775

 

 

thanks for all

 

and i concur, it's unsuitable to quote a lot of pictures.

 

Well it looks like her race for the respect of her choice works a minimum (not here because here apparently it is too hard to delete a simple photo to respect her choice) all instagram's accointances Who had published it and refused to delete it were deleted! The photo still exists and will always exist but it is already a good thing 

7 minutes ago, carococoo said:

Well it looks like her race for the respect of her choice works a minimum (not here because here apparently it is too hard to delete a simple photo to respect her choice) all instagram's accointances Who had published it and refused to delete it were deleted! The photo still exists and will always exist but it is already a good thing 

Not true, those that posted it on Instagram deleted it by choice, there's still I think one account that still has it up. Because really there's nothing she can do to get it deleted from instagram, that's why she was pleading with those that posted it and not just reporting them. If someone wants to post it there's nothing she can do to stop that.

Le Lis Blanc

 

 

https://www.instagram.com/p/BXA7tGiBIzu/

 

 

runway compilation:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akigEZwbJ3g

 

On 8.7.2017 at 0:56 PM, a said:

ELLE Russia, August 2017

 

 

ELLE RUSSIA AUGUST 2017 without text 

 

PARIS 16th ARRONDISSEMENT 1980s

PHOTOGRAPHER: NICK HUDSON
STYLING: VADIM GALAGNOV
HAIR: OLIVIER LEBRUN
MAKE UP: KATHY LeSANT
NAILS: LORANDY

 

qualityfashionphoto.com

3 hours ago, bandit55 said:

Eh, she was pretty close to being nude in Lui. There really wasn't that much left to the imagination. It's kinda silly imo. Like if you're going to expose 99.5%, might as well show the other 5% too

I don't think it matters what was left to the imagination, it's how Barbara feels personally about being nude. I understand, and that's really her choice no matter how frustrating it is.

 

On a more positive note for Barbara, I understand why she'd be embarrassed and want the photo taken down, but at least she did this professionally. It's one thing to have an unpublished nude from a photoshoot floating around the internet but something else entirely if she were the victim of a hacking. I only hope that this is a mild embarrassment for her and that she can find a way to get passed it.

People, get f'in over it already... there is NO GOING BACK on this matter! 

People have the right to express their opinion. No need to yell at them.

1 hour ago, twopercentsuccess said:

I don't think it matters what was left to the imagination, it's how Barbara feels personally about being nude. I understand, and that's really her choice no matter how frustrating it is.

 

On a more positive note for Barbara, I understand why she'd be embarrassed and want the photo taken down, but at least she did this professionally. It's one thing to have an unpublished nude from a photoshoot floating around the internet but something else entirely if she were the victim of a hacking. I only hope that this is a mild embarrassment for her and that she can find a way to get passed it.

 

there are a lot of job where you can be prudish , but come on she's a model, if she wants to be prudish she can be a seller or a baker !

I didn't believe this at first, but wow, poor Barbara  her personal line has been crossed and I hope she is okay. hopefully no other photos get released

She apparently posed willingly for the nude shot as part of the shoot. Surely the only issue is around the editing and granting of permission for publication in the Love magazine issue. There is always a chance of outtakes being leaked, so, if you want to eliminate that risk don't pose naked in the first place.

Having said all that I personally think the photo in question is lovely and further enhances her beauty and appeal.  

Wahou

6 minutes ago, m1sterss1pp1 said:

. There is always a chance of outtakes being leaked, so, if you want to eliminate that risk don't pose naked in the first place.

 

mmmm no...the problem here is that the LOVE MAGAZINE promised Barbara nipples will not show . she trusted them... thats why she agreed on posing nude. the photo was supposed to be with some type of censored in the nipples. 

 

People here commenting: ugh Barbara get over it .. why u pose naked then? why u did lui?...... lol .... its ALL about the agreement that she and the magazine had. 

the problem is not just about showing the nipples. its about respect an agreement or contract .

 

Barbara liked this:

 

balazzon ?  bellazon

3 hours ago, protowalkoffame said:

 

there are a lot of job where you can be prudish , but come on she's a model, if she wants to be prudish she can be a seller or a baker !

 

This is a very fucked up logic to have.

^^this

 

 

 

 

 

15 minutes ago, MarVS said:

the problem is not just about showing the nipples. its about respect an agreement or contract .

 

Barbara liked this:

 

Or… She got swept up by the atmosphere during the shoot and then regretted it once the picture was in print… Thinking what would her family members think of it especially if they had not been happy with her increasingly risqué shoots (Lui, Maxim, Love Advent)