Jump to content

Jade Bahr

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jade Bahr

  1. He seems to develop a soft daddy spot for models by his side. Leos ex Kelly Rohrbach is also in Yellowstone.
  2. Jade Bahr replied to Jade Bahr's post in a topic in Actresses
  3. Jade Bahr replied to Sunshiine's post in a topic in Female Musicians
  4. Jade Bahr replied to Nefertiti's post in a topic in Actresses
  5. Jade Bahr replied to Legion's post in a topic in Movies
    Interesting. Love when only 1 or 2 actors are capable to carry a whole movie. Margaret Qualley is gorgeous while Christopher Abbott is like the rough version of Kit Harington.
  6. ^I think Leo was one of a few and for sure the last movie star people were slightly interested in seeing him winning the oscar - I mean people created a whole movement with all sorts of memes around him and that stupid statue lol Don't think I ever witnessed this kind of commitment ever again. It's also nothing but the ugly truth how everything of that excitement puffed literally into nothing once he led hands on that oscar. But that very much represent the culture we live in. People just lose interest suddenly and move on to someone/thing else. It's a concept I hardly understand for myself. Maybe I'm too attached even to people I don't even know personal LOL
  7. Despite ‘Barbenheimer,’ Oscar Ratings Remain Low (19.5 Million Viewers) Last year around 19 million people watched the Oscars. This year’s telecast moved up an hour to 7pm, was driven by ‘Barbenheimer’ hype and only managed to bring in 19.5 million viewers— slightly better numbers. However, this year’s telecast actually fell short in the key 18-49 demographic, with a 3.8 rating. By comparison, the 2023 telecast had a 4.0 rating in final tallies. That means this year’s show was down 5% in the most important demo. Younger viewers just don’t care enough about the Oscars, or TV, for that matter, to tune in — they can also just watch the highlights on YouTube the day after. Even more concerning, the show is losing its core "loyal" audience, aged 50 and over, who grew up going to the movies, but are now more into streaming content at home. Sure, Hollywood movies just aren’t as culturally relevant as they used to be. One can remember a time when Best Picture winners such as “Gladiator,” “Titanic,” “The Silence of the Lambs,” “Forrest Gump,” and “The Lord of the Rings” were actually seen by millions of Americans. Now? “CODA”? “Nomadland”? “EEAAO”? These just aren’t films that cracked popular culture in the same way the others did. Then again, the problem with using this argument in 2024 is that the two most popular films from last year were nominated and had an immense presence at last night’s ceremony. “Barbeheimer” was a cultural phenomenon, but that, weirdly enough, didn’t translate into a highly-watched Oscar ceremony. So, what’s going on here exactly? Isn’t it strange how, just ten years ago, in 2014, Oscar ratings reached an impressive 40 million viewers? When compared to last night’s telecast, that’s a loss of 22 million. Maybe the biggest factor, when it comes to these low ratings, resides in watching the 1% showering the 1% with trophy love and that’s just not something that’s compatible with our current societal zeitgeist. Frankly, it kind of sounds absurd when you think about it. Seeing rich people, at a luxurious event, sprinkling each other with self-congratulatory masturbation just doesn’t add up anymore. The Oscars are a relic from the past, when seeing celebrities wasn’t an everyday thing. We are a society oversaturated with celebrity content via social media, and thus there’s no excitement in seeing the stars. This is why I keep saying that the only way for an Oscar telecast to ever “work” again is if you hire Ricky Gervais to expose the absurdity of it all.
  8. Jade Bahr replied to Jade Bahr's post in a topic in Actresses
  9. Jade Bahr replied to tinkerbelle's post in a topic in Male Actors
  10. Jade Bahr replied to not90's post in a topic in Actresses
    Does anyone knows if that is all her real hair or extentions? Either way so glorious. Source GLAMBOT | Oscars 2024 Source
  11. Jade Bahr replied to not90's post in a topic in Actresses
    Another goddess
  12. Still haven't seen POOR THINGS (but already pre ordered my copy). The movie as her performance seems to divide minds either you hate or love it nothing in between thing but I think her reaction at the oscars when she won was cute. And like you said it's not like she dragged people to vote for her. I also think she's hilarious and just too goddamn likeable to be mad at her. I'm happy for her Source But she and Lily genuinely seem to like each other. So I think people don't have to start bad blood where no bad blood is. Maybe going best actress instead of supporting was a too bold move from apple/Lily (whoever decided that) compared to Emma who's what I've heard in every scene of POOR THINGS while Lily in KOTFM is only seen half the movie. If any. And on top of it not doing that much in the 2nd half (but lying half dead in bed sry lol).
  13. Jade Bahr replied to I LOVE ADRIANA's post in a topic in Male Actors
  14. Jade Bahr replied to FashionDream's post in a topic in Actresses
  15. Jade Bahr replied to LUCKY STAR2006's post in a topic in Actresses
    Lovely. 2024 vanity fair oscar party
  16. Jade Bahr replied to Theron's post in a topic in Actresses
    Carey Mulligan, 96th Academy Awards, 10/3/2024 Really like the shape of the dress.
  17. Why didn't it work out?
  18. Jade Bahr replied to Shepherd's post in a topic in Female Musicians
  19. Jade Bahr replied to katchitup's post in a topic in General Talk
    Congrats!
  20. Just posting because it's nice seeing Leos name here 😄
  21. Jade Bahr replied to AbbeyRoad's post in a topic in Male Actors
    Congrats!!
  22. Jade Bahr replied to hoolri's post in a topic in Actresses
    Congrats to Emma