SympathysSilhouette

Aaaw, Erin is pretty, it's just that they seem to have done their absolute best to make her look her worst.

What I found even more odd than her breast augmentation is how odd her face looks in some shots. I suspect it's not plastic surgery. Tiredness? Boredom? She seems slightly out of it in a lot of shots.

Confirming my theory that Nina would be the funnest girlfriend of this SI crop. Though probably also one of the weirdest.

I will say this: Hannah Ferguson's intimates video is the hottest SISE related thing in a long time.

Hailey - I'm not a huge fan of hers but I sort of liked her shoot Ashley - Not my cup of tea Nina - Hit and miss for me this year, but the shots that do work are some of the best of this year's edition Bo - Perhaps the best-looking body in the issue but the shoot itself fell well short of her potential Barbara - I had some hopes for her but she was unfortunately amongst the poorest shoots this year. Chanel - Okay I guess Chrissy - To my great surprise, I didn't really mind Chrissy's shoot this year. Gigi - Liked Gigi a lot more than I thought I would. Decent shoot Hannah D - Incredibly forgettable shoot and coming just a year removed from her cover Hannah F - Incredible body and good shoot. Still room for improvement though. Lily - Never been a big fan. Completely forgettable shoot Kelly - Meh Samantha - I will never be a fan but by her standards, a decent shoot Tanya - Fairly forgettable shoot Rose - Glad she is back but not sure if this is an improvement on last year for her Emily D - Emily is a very beautiful girl but I'm increasingly convinced that SISE is just not her thing Robyn - One of the oddest SI shoots in recent history. Odd decision altogether to have her return. Sofia - Okay, nothing more Kate B - Middle of the pack for me, nothing especially memorable in there.

Me bunk in my be.

You don't? I see plenty of male actors who do not conform to beauty ideals. Far more than female actors. And on top of that, male actors get to play mainstream leading man roles for about 20 years longer than their female counterparts.

I hope the Opie & Anthony gang realize how unintentionally ridiculous they are, considering that Ashley is more attractive than all of them combined (said as someone who hates the Ashley cover). I also recall reading some not so great things about one of those two guys from a model who dated one of them. I believe it was the short, dark-haired, lizard-looking one (I can't be arsed to look up which one of the two that is because who fucking cares), who was a bit of a selfish, abusive asshole, if said ex-girlfriend is to be believed.

I just think Ronda is ugly. Also I've read/heard stories that Ronda is a stuck up bitch. Unpopular opinion: I don't like any of those three covers.

I just think it's a bit gimmicky and devalues the cover somewhat. I felt the same about the trio cover to shoe-horn Chrissy in there (obviously since MJ lacked the courage to give Chrissy a solo cover).

Wait, some people love Chrissy? Other than her family, you mean?

I have to say that only Bojana has really wowed me a bit in terms of the rookie reveals. And even then, only in the youtube clip.

Looks like she fills out a pair of jeans quite well too.

I liked the Bojana Youtube clip. The picture is only so-and-so, but I suspect there will be a lot better things to come from her in the issue and on si.com.

Based on the information she herself shared on Instagram, Johanna must now be around 8 months pregnant.

Ah, apologies.

Poor Barbara, just can't catch a break, can she?

Clinton is significantly to the right of Blair's New Labour.

A pretty cool guy, for a narrow-minded bigot then?

Only within the American context. In Europe he would be deemed a right-of-center moderate.

The thing about BMI is that it is a useful tool to measure the health of populations (by taking the average BMI of a group) not necessarily of individuals. A common criticism used is that BMI would deem some pro athletes (who are all muscle) as being overweight. But then, such considerations matter less when measuring the health of large groups, since most of us aren't professional athletes.

Well it is very, very unlikely that Ashley would meet the WHO standards for being overweight.

Fat is a relative term. So it's essentially meaningless. A very thin person might feel fat if they gain like 2 lbs. So what exactly is your baseline for comparison if you deem Ashley to be fat? It cannot be the population average in the US (or other English-speaking countries for that matter).