Joe > Average

The supermodel era is definiely over in the sense of being an international supermodel, but (don't hate me ) even if it were to magically come back tomorrow I still don't think Lara Stone would be a big mainstreem model because her kind of face is something high fashion fans can appreciate, but not the mass mainstreem audience . The average woman if they saw her on a cosmetics commercial would probably say, "I'm prettier than her how's she become a model" ect. But in what she's doing she is appreciated how she is .

Taylor and Taylor x3

Woman in a lovely white dress hanging gracefully on the edge of a skyscraper is just too good !!! Yours is nice too Squeege . Dizzy Kate x3 .

Thanks for the intro Ophie that was beautiful ! Thanks to lisa for the Vanessa intro and nice one VogueGirl. I like both the same in all...I'm undecided .

@ Baron ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ My Vote Mini Red Ana Blue Ana Gold Mini Gold Tyra Caroline ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ Has the song hit Slovenia yet ? Awww Pretty , aw shucks . I had never heard of this, thanks . This is the only song I know with Pretty in the title .

Morning star panties, morning star panties, morning star panties and a baseball bat .

Ana - Never seen panties with spikes. I must admit I find them both terrifying and...strangely fascinating :ninja: . barbaress panties of death FTW . Mini Gisele Caroline

Well if its a comedy show that makes sense . I agree these aren't my type of girls either, but I voted Selena and agree with this...

Roxanne, you did it I'm so proud . Angelina x3 - I'm not a fan, but she's a really beautiful woman that really knows how to pose .

Well yes. I was on the move and came back later thinking I could get back before responses . But anyways, I couldn't help but bring this up . A different type of kid show :shock: :shock: :shock: ...I was told this was a real kid show. I don't know whether he was joking or now . :|

Seems like just yesturday you had 9,000. Actually.... . But anyway, !!!

I haven't seen the movies but Ahsley seems comparatively pretty compared to the other two. But I didn't vote because she seems to be the next big thing around here and I don't know whether I approve or not yet .

Exactly! They're all too pretty, too cute, too perfect, too pure and no one is like that! Its children's entertainment . Basically like a cartoon only with real people is the idea . As for children, with they type of images children are exposed to now they aren't really innocent like they once were. If they like something pure, even if its "too pure" I say children should be allowed to have as much as they want. There's definitely more than enough impurity out there to make up for it...Teenagers on the other hand are more than aware of the fallen, drunken former child stars of the world and see these girls on the news everytime they scratch their butt, so I doubt their trying to convince them they float on clouds ...

Congrats to New Orleans and their Saints . Probably for the same reason Farve (with 19 years experience) with wide open space and field goal range chose to scramble to throw the ball across his body .

Face - 10 - lovely catlike eyes, lovely bone structure, amazing amazing lips and really great smile Body - 9.5 Amazing model too. Knows how to connect with the camera, one of the best on the runway and edgy enough for high fashion but commercial enough for commercial.

Good idea and good luck to you .

How do you know all that? That's not based on all the voters, just the ones that commented .

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: @ this thread But on a serious note, this thread has definitely been eye opening. And I can't explain how good it feels to have many of the suspisions you've felt all along confirmed . One lingering question remains though. Are Lindsay Ellingston and Heatherton Ellingston really the same person ? And the result of both digital wizardry and hollygraphy ?

I know they're a little destructive, but I voted for the hailstones . I remember when I was a little boy and was missing for awhile because I was trying to see how many I could catch with a grocery bag. Some kindof hurt a little bit and I got a really bad beating and punishment afterwards, but aside from that, its a memory I'll always cherish and as a side note, they also look so delicious .

I knew you'd say that . Ironically I feel the same about you. You're a great guy, but your argument is ridiculous largely because of your predetermined biases (namesly that you don't like the Colts because of that midnight 18-wheeler ) 1. My argument isn't based on numbers. Numbers can mean anything independent of events. My argument is based on events and I used numbers to represent those events. The argument being they are a genuinely more talented team than the Colts independent of quarterbacks. Take away the starting quarterbacks and the Colts definitely loose to the Saints or Chargers. 2. Your own argument kindof contradicts itself. You say a good quarterback is supposed to elevate the play of the team. Well, they won the most games and were undefeated from the start of the season until the time their coach sat them down to rest for the playoffs. In what way did Peyton hold his cast back from their full potential? The talent of the Colts is already maximized, they're simply less talented. The problem is you are attributing genuine differences in talent to the merit of the quarterback in this case. And Darren Sharper has been great at picking off passes for his entire career BTW... 3. You really think the difference between 6th running game and 32nd is the difference between Brees and Manning? No chance. Its easier to run for the Saints because their running backs are genuinely much more athletic and the offensive line is much better as well (at both run blocking and pass protection as well). Reggie Bush isn't even the premier back for the Saints and runs circles around any Colts running back. The Saints and Chargers have overall more talented receivers, defenses, running backs, offensive lines and better coaches as well. Darren Sproles runs circles around any Colt's back as well. The worse your running game is, the more the defense plays the pass and as a result, defenses play the pass even more against the Colts. 4. And there is absolutely NO comparisson of the Charger's overall team to the Colts. Take both quarterbacks away and the Chargers and their much better offensive line, more athletic players, better running backs and shooting guard sized receivers, offensive guru head coach (like the Saint's Sean Payton) would absolutely win. Patriots too actually.

He's a nice guy and I like him . But robbed? Peyton won 1 more game (14), Brees threw one more touchdown (34). With turnovers, Peyton had 16 interceptions and 0 lost fumbles With turnovers, Brees had 11 interceptions and 6 lost fumbles But overall, Peyton is a higher % of his team's success than any other quarterback in the league. In the cast of Brees, the Saint's running backs and defense (and realistically coach and offensive line too) overall had much more impact than the Colts. The Saint's runningbacks helped more than the Colt's Saint's 6th vs. 32nd Colts The Saint's defense did more for the Saint's offense than the Colt's defense They beat the colts in sacks They beat the Colts in interceptions (3rd in the league) They beat the Colts in interceptions for touchdowns (1st in the league) They beat the Colts in interception yards (1st in the league) They beat the colts in points by defense (4th in the league) They beat the Colts in forced fumbles They beat the Colts in defensive recovered fumbles (5th vs. 25th) They beat the Colts in defensive fumbles for touchdowns (1st in the league) Special Teams Even beat the Colt's in return yard averages (5th vs. 18th) which helps field position Coaching I'd definitely take Sean Payton who is an offensive genius. Peyton Manning is basically the offensive coordinator for the Colts. No team in the NFL relies on their quarterback more than the Colts.

I originally said 2 per person until 20 nominations are made. But since (counting yours) I've got 3 nominations (less than 1 per day ) I'll change that to unlimited per person . Pics: 5 for face, 5 for body (including a minimum of 1 representing their respective side)

I wanted to vote Izabel x3 in the previous round but didn't want to add to the slaughter . For Edita and Caroline Hmmm...tough....because I'm not a big fan of either leg pics...so... 1.5 each .

Lindsay Hetherton Ellinston was due ! j/k, congrats to Adri and great job again !