6 minutes ago, EsraLima said:

Is she in LA yet ? 

I don't think so, from her last ig stories she was with Debbie and Adrielle yesterday evening

8 hours ago, EsraLima said:

Is she in LA yet ? 

VMAs are in NY

1 hour ago, lucyford said:

VMAs are in NY

On google it says they are at the Prudential Center in Newark, New Jersey

2 minutes ago, nhlovesadri said:

On google it says they are at the Prudential Center in Newark, New Jersey

Oh that’s my bad, it’s usually been in NY. 

1 hour ago, lucyford said:

Oh that’s my bad, it’s usually been in NY. 

 

1 hour ago, nhlovesadri said:

On google it says they are at the Prudential Center in Newark, New Jersey

 

But she's still in Miami.. I know there's the picture of the seating but are you sure she's going ?  

5 minutes ago, EsraLima said:

 

 

But she's still in Miami.. I know there's the picture of the seating but are you sure she's going ?  

She must have confirmed she’s going for her picture to be on a seat reserved for her. It’s not a long flight there, she’ll prob leave later today. The show isn’t even till tomorrow night so there’s plenty of time. I wouldn’t see why she’d want to be there early anyways since it’s not like she has anything else to do in New Jersey. 

13 minutes ago, lucyford said:

She must have confirmed she’s going for her picture to be on a seat reserved for her. It’s not a long flight there, she’ll prob leave later today. The show isn’t even till tomorrow night so there’s plenty of time. I wouldn’t see why she’d want to be there early anyways since it’s not like she has anything else to do in New Jersey. 

Oh it's not tonight ? My bad I thought it was tonight so yeah ok she can leave today! Thanks 

12 minutes ago, EsraLima said:

Oh it's not tonight ? My bad I thought it was tonight so yeah ok she can leave today! Thanks 

Yeah it’s Monday at 8 pm on MTV. 

Yup lol her confidence is back

4 hours ago, lucyford said:

Yup lol her confidence is back

 

Also, I see marc jacobs commented under her photo. I love that. Since she has started posting more GOOD content, more people from the modelling industry are starting to comment under her stuff. Thats good, its going to make them want to work with her again and stuff like that.

 

Also,  I really love how she did this because she because famous for that 'no longer getting naked for empty causes quote' and by doing this, she is sticking to it. And that will bring even more publicity to the cause do. This was a good thing of her to do

35 minutes ago, Souled-Out said:

 

Also, I see marc jacobs commented under her photo. I love that. Since she has started posting more GOOD content, more people from the modelling industry are starting to comment under her stuff. Thats good, its going to make them want to work with her again and stuff like that.

 

Also,  I really love how she did this because she because famous for that 'no longer getting naked for empty causes quote' and by doing this, she is sticking to it. And that will bring even more publicity to the cause do. This was a good thing of her to do

I‘ve been hoping that her Vogue Spain cover/editorial with Irina will get them a campaign together. But yeah I agree it seems fashion people and even models are liking her stuff more recently. 

 

I actually think Adriana should NOT have posted that second picture. She really needs a social media team. Obviously the nudity was going to bring negativity and the risk of Ig deleting it. It seems like the one in her story got deleted. At least for me. Why couldn’t she just post it like Russel did???  People are thinking she’s a hypocrite because she said she wouldn’t get naked anymore but posted that. When Adriana said that, I think people didn’t realize she was saying she was against shooting vulgar shots/videos not necessarily posing nude. And it seems people are forgetting the EMPTY CAUSE part. Anywyas she shouldn’t have posted the second picture. She clearly went back to look for it too because russel didn’t post that. I may be wrong but it seems Adriana does things like that when she has a new boyfriend. Remember when she was with edelman she posted that naked mirror selfie? Although you couldn’t see much, it was an unnecessary picture. I don’t have a problem with it, but it’s obvious a lot of people will.

1 hour ago, lucyford said:

 

 

I actually think Adriana should NOT have posted that second picture. She really needs a social media team. Obviously the nudity was going to bring negativity and the risk of Ig deleting it. It seems like the one in her story got deleted. At least for me. Why couldn’t she just post it like Russel did???  People are thinking she’s a hypocrite because she said she wouldn’t get naked anymore but posted that. When Adriana said that, I think people didn’t realize she was saying she was against shooting vulgar shots/videos not necessarily posing nude. And it seems people are forgetting the EMPTY CAUSE part. Anywyas she shouldn’t have posted the second picture. She clearly went back to look for it too because russel didn’t post that. I may be wrong but it seems Adriana does things like that when she has a new boyfriend. Remember when she was with edelman she posted that naked mirror selfie? Although you couldn’t see much, it was an unnecessary picture. I don’t have a problem with it, but it’s obvious a lot of people will.

 

Yeah I don't agree. Its not her fault that people are stupid and don't want to remember the empty cause part. There are a number of people who do remember her saying the empty causes part. And the fact that she said "empty causes" was a big part of her quote. When it made headlines people mentioned that part as well. Anybody who is ignoring that or "forgetting" that part of the quote are def going to get checked. People remember that empty causes part because she had to connect that with why she was still willing to walk the 2018 VS Fashion show. There are just stupid people on the internet making stupid comments and she shouldn't be THAT careful based on those stupid people. If people don't remember the empty cause part or they are being an asshole and neglect it, its literally their fault. She shouldn't walk on eggshells for them. She is doing what she said she would.

 

 

I have no complaints about how she is running her social media right now. Like I said, its getting her name back out there and obviously she is serious about building her brand. She needs to be doing what she is now. Not only to maintain her spot in the industry but if she wants to branch out, she gotta keep her name out there.

2 minutes ago, Souled-Out said:

 

Yeah I don't agree. Its not her fault that people are stupid and don't want to remember the empty cause part. There are a number of people who do remember her saying the empty causes part. And the fact that she said "empty causes" was a big part of her quote. When it made headlines people mentioned that part as well. Anybody who is ignoring that or "forgetting" that part of the quote are def going to get checked. People remember that empty causes part because she had to connect that with why she was still willing to walk the 2018 VS Fashion show. There are just stupid people on the internet making stupid comments and she shouldn't be THAT careful based on those stupid people. If people don't remember the empty cause part or they are being an asshole and neglect it, its literally their fault. She shouldn't walk on eggshells for them. She is doing what she said she would.

 

 

I have no complaints about how she is running her social media right now. Like I said, its getting her name back out there and obviously she is serious about building her brand. She needs to be doing what she is now. Not only to maintain her spot in the industry but if she wants to branch out, she gotta keep her name out there.

She shouldn’t have posted the second photo regardless of what she said about not taking off her clothes. I mean I don’t midn it but let’s not forget kids are on IG too these days.And it’s just obviously going to get backlash.

 

Yeah I think CAA will be better for her in terms of keeping her name out there not just in fashion. As I’ve mentioned, I think they have been getting her to more events for the media. 

8 hours ago, lucyford said:

She shouldn’t have posted the second photo regardless of what she said about not taking off her clothes. I mean I don’t midn it but let’s not forget kids are on IG too these days.And it’s just obviously going to get backlash.

 

Yeah I think CAA will be better for her in terms of keeping her name out there not just in fashion. As I’ve mentioned, I think they have been getting her to more events for the media. 

 

The second photo violates instagram's terms but the most they can do is remove it. Can she really be expected to have to consider all the children on Instagram before she posts a nude photo of herself? If a kid is on instagram (and by the way, they shouldn't be and it's largely on their parents) they're likely to be exposed to worse. 

 

In terms of the nude photo and her past statements. I think the issue in general is that she shouldn't have made that statement when she did. It was in poor taste and belied the way in which she has amassed her fortune and status. We all called it out at the time. It was a misstep. But the caption does make it overwhelmingly clear that the pictures for Russell's book were related to a good cause. It's not really a contradictory thing for her to do. That said, even though people should be smart enough to evaluate her statement in full before jumping on her, you know that they won't. And I think a large part of good PR/media relations is anticipating a backlash and knowing that it might be a bad look in light of her past comments and the stupidity of the outrage mob. However, I don't think this will be too bad for her. 

 

Anyone else wish those photos were in better quality though? Lol

34 minutes ago, fieldofoptics said:

 

The second photo violates instagram's terms but the most they can do is remove it. Can she really be expected to have to consider all the children on Instagram before she posts a nude photo of herself? If a kid is on instagram (and by the way, they shouldn't be and it's largely on their parents) they're likely to be exposed to worse. 

 

In terms of the nude photo and her past statements. I think the issue in general is that she shouldn't have made that statement when she did. It was in poor taste and belied the way in which she has amassed her fortune and status. We all called it out at the time. It was a misstep. But the caption does make it overwhelmingly clear that the pictures for Russell's book were related to a good cause. It's not really a contradictory thing for her to do. That said, even though people should be smart enough to evaluate her statement in full before jumping on her, you know that they won't. And I think a large part of good PR/media relations is anticipating a backlash and knowing that it might be a bad look in light of her past comments and the stupidity of the outrage mob. However, I don't think this will be too bad for her. 

 

Anyone else wish those photos were in better quality though? Lol

Well there are plenty of kids on IG. But it doesn’t have to be just kids, maybe some people feel uncomfortable with that. It was unnecessary to post the second one. Russell didn’t do it. She clearly went and looked for it herself to post.  

 

 I agree she should have never made that statement because it was likely to be misinterpreted, as it seems even you are doing now. Adriana said she didn’t want to take her clothes off for an empty cause. She was referring to the Love advent videos since she said it was a video for social media. Adriana never said she was against nudity, she was against posing or shooting soemthing vulgar. Adriana didn’t make her fortunate as you say doing that. Adriana always stood up for Vs and it seems she actually thought it was empowering for women. VS wasn’t vulgar honestly. SI is vulgar and targeted for men but she never even stepped foot there. I don’t think that statement she made was poor taste at all, but i do think she could have done better job at explaining.

56 minutes ago, fieldofoptics said:

Anyone else wish those photos were in better quality though? Lol

We already have those two in a decent quality, not HD but good. I'd have been more interested on the third photo we know she has on that book, never released if not for a small preview on acollage of photos for the book that we got I don't remember where, probably at the day of the presentaton event in NY she attended. Maybe she has more then 3, idk for sure even if somebody here on BZ said in another thread there aren't many of her, nobody scanned or photographed it sadly...

2 hours ago, lucyford said:

Well there are plenty of kids on IG. But it doesn’t have to be just kids, maybe some people feel uncomfortable with that. It was unnecessary to post the second one. Russell didn’t do it. She clearly went and looked for it herself to post.  

 

 I agree she should have never made that statement because it was likely to be misinterpreted, as it seems even you are doing now. Adriana said she didn’t want to take her clothes off for an empty cause. She was referring to the Love advent videos since she said it was a video for social media. Adriana never said she was against nudity, she was against posing or shooting soemthing vulgar. Adriana didn’t make her fortunate as you say doing that. Adriana always stood up for Vs and it seems she actually thought it was empowering for women. VS wasn’t vulgar honestly. SI is vulgar and targeted for men but she never even stepped foot there. I don’t think that statement she made was poor taste at all, but i do think she could have done better job at explaining.

 

I didn't misinterpret anything. VS would seem to most as being a way for models to make money. Few people would regard it as something other than a means to make money and achieve a status within modeling. She received a lot of pushback for those statements and the timing of them. "Empty cause might be subjective, but there is a base line interpretation when you're a celebrity and you make a statement about not taking your clothes off after owing your career to a lingerie brand. I don't have an issue with her posting the images she did. Her caption in fact spoke to the opposite of an empty cause. But when she made that statement, the overwhelming response was people mentioning that she pretty much owes what she has to taking off her clothes for the sake of making money/vs. The backlash was strong enough to where people here pointed out that people in the industry took issue with her commentary. 

 

I don't agree that adriana shouldn't pose nude images because some people might feel uncomfortable. 

2 hours ago, nhlovesadri said:

We already have those two in a decent quality, not HD but good. I'd have been more interested on the third photo we know she has on that book, never released if not for a small preview on acollage of photos for the book that we got I don't remember where, probably at the day of the presentaton event in NY she attended. Maybe she has more then 3, idk for sure even if somebody here on BZ said in another thread there aren't many of her, nobody scanned or photographed it sadly...

 

Yeah I'm aware. I meant I wish she posted them in better quality. It would have been better for her feed. 

28 minutes ago, fieldofoptics said:

 

I didn't misinterpret anything. VS would seem to most as being a way for models to make money. Few people would regard it as something other than a means to make money and achieve a status within modeling. She received a lot of pushback for those statements and the timing of them. "Empty cause might be subjective, but there is a base line interpretation when you're a celebrity and you make a statement about not taking your clothes off after owing your career to a lingerie brand. I don't have an issue with her posting the images she did. Her caption in fact spoke to the opposite of an empty cause. But when she made that statement, the overwhelming response was people mentioning that she pretty much owes what she has to taking off her clothes for the sake of making money/vs. The backlash was strong enough to where people here pointed out that people in the industry took issue with her commentary. 

 

I don't agree that adriana shouldn't pose nude images because some people might feel uncomfortable. 

 

Again, she never said she was against taking her clothes off. She walked VS another year and was clearly emotional. It’s clear she loved working with them and didn’t have something against them. She wasn’t talking about VS when she said that. She was clearly talking about Love Advent and doing another video similar to the one she did in the shower with a bunny. Adriana clearly doesn’t have a problem posing nude. She did it for Vogue Spain recently too. She is clearly against doing shots/videos that are vulgar. As I mentioned, VS isn’t vulgar. I mean the brand is targeted for women. SI as I mentioned is different. Vulgar and for men. 

 

 

I mean it’s IG policy NOT to pose nude photos. She should know its going to bring backlash.  

It seems like Adriana might already be in NY/NJ? The photo she posted in a robe dancing seems like it might be from a hotel/pre-prep. 

 

Hope I'm right and can't wait to see her look 🤪