Jump to content
Forum Look Announcement

Featured Replies

  • 2 weeks later...

Since there isn't much going on in her thread, do you guys like her better in High Fashion/Other stuff than VS or in VS? I know she didn't do a lot of runway or blue chip campaigns or things like that, but I thought she was good for Urban Outfitters and her new Maxim stuff is awesome!

I've been looking through her thread and I love her early work, even just the random photographs from random photographers. She shines in anything except PINK. I hope she has more work coming out soon since she's done with PINK I think I'll like whatever else she is doing.

I hope she went to the SI castings again! It doesn’t hurt to try (well, maybe a little...). Not everyone gets in the magazine right away.

  • 2 weeks later...
On ‎7‎/‎1‎/‎2017 at 1:41 PM, Sanni said:

I hope she went to the SI castings again! It doesn’t hurt to try (well, maybe a little...). Not everyone gets in the magazine right away.

So she's gone before I take it? I think she could do well. I'm so used to seeing her in PINK that I kinda imagine her possible SI shots being goofy like PINK, but she looked so good in the Maxim shoot that I do think she could really well with SI.

I hate seeing her career stagnate, unless she herself decided to take a break.

I can only go by what she posts on Instagram and I’m not an expert on her career so even if she did post a hint, I’m not sure I could pick up on that :/

 

But here are Bobbi Brown Cosmetics Facebook videos! :smile:

 

 

 

On 15/6/2017 at 0:19 AM, nightlocks said:

Julia Martins Miranda Ph.

 

_dsc830804a288da93e2e52486e4acad0c0744c1_thumb.jpg _dsc92397553ed8feff1c2a4a06c682dd22635ac_thumb.jpg _dsc8152c48affd54610966a5a1452423886e386_thumb.jpg _dsc95045d5753348a77fbb828f3877a924678c3_thumb (1).jpg 263495fqSDn0po.jpg 263495jd8THvWA.jpg 263495I8AHxDsd.jpg

I have to agree with bump here, her work outside of vs pink has been good. I like her a lot more when she does more serious shoots.

 

also thanks for the new adds!

I feel a little dumb asking this, but what is so terrible about her Pink work? I always felt like she was a great successor to Elsa; fun, plucky, and super cute. She's great outside of the company but her sudden decline at Victoria's Secret came as a massive surprise to me. I'm just wondering if there's something I'm missing about her work.

5 minutes ago, twopercentsuccess said:

I feel a little dumb asking this, but what is so terrible about her Pink work? I always felt like she was a great successor to Elsa; fun, plucky, and super cute. She's great outside of the company but her sudden decline at Victoria's Secret came as a massive surprise to me. I'm just wondering if there's something I'm missing about her work.

 

I actually agree. I loved her work with VS Pink. That's when I really became enamored with her. Fun and super cute are good words to describe her during that time.

I like Rachel but I thought she was out of place for pink.  She looked too old.  Also, she is very physically imposing and not dainty & very young looking like Brooke Perry and Maggie laine.

 

I've seen Rachael model dresses in department store layouts and she looks great.  Her legs are amazing.

I'm one who really enjoyed her work for VS. She is tall, yes, but I would disagree with Cult Icon about her looking too old--especially given her succeeding Elsa. (Not that she looked old, but she was older than that target audience, and Rachel was more squarely at/near that target, IMO.) Her figure and legs are amazing, and she has a great future. But I am still kind of mystified by the decision. Ah well. Let's enjoy where she goes from here. 

I don't think Rachel looks old either. She looks like any girl you'd see around campus, and I figured that's who she's selling to. It's true she's super fit, but I don't see how that's a disqualifier for Pink. I hope she finds new work quickly, but I don't want her to lose the personality she brought to Pink.

On 3/30/2017 at 5:35 PM, nightlocks said:

+2

 

bdb1b0540999749.jpg

See-Through

  Hide contents

bddfdd540999751.jpg 

 

Sarah Silver PH 

 

16e382540999773.jpg 

top two are unavailable

 

17 hours ago, twopercentsuccess said:

I feel a little dumb asking this, but what is so terrible about her Pink work? I always felt like she was a great successor to Elsa; fun, plucky, and super cute. She's great outside of the company but her sudden decline at Victoria's Secret came as a massive surprise to me. I'm just wondering if there's something I'm missing about her work.

I didn't care for her expressions and the faces she made. While I know every other PINK girl made the same faces, Rachel's face (which is so beautiful normally) didn't look good making those faces, her face is too round and chubby. When she made those faces she looks squished and weird. I also don't like her midsection which PINK tends to highlight a lot. She has a great body, I like that she's thicker, but the PINK clothes just didn't always work for me on her combined with the faces.

She had a great enthusiasm though, and I loved that she appreciated her spokesmodel position.

 

She is so pretty and I think she shines in regular shoots (not for VS obviously, I don't think I'd like her as an angel either).

I liked her work for Pink but I never really felt like she was a strong spokesperson, was she good yes? Was she better than the rest of the pink girls who were working with her? Nope, Brooke Perry for example does a better job. I also think Rachel was never going to be made an Angel, VS probably felt like investing money on a woman who had no future with the brand was a waste, I think Zuri will suffer the same fate and she'll get dropped after this year's show. Grace on the other hand, is bound to become an Angel as soon as she is done with Pink.

 

I wish Rachel the best, but I think she and Pink parting ways was the best 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.