Skip to content

Emily Ratajkowski

Featured Replies

5 hours ago, hottness said:

Thanks for that. But I'm talking specifically about manipulating their bodies on IG to give the illusion that their bodies are something that they are not in reality.

 

Models pose their bodies to look as best as they can, that's kind of the entire basis of the industry.  It really has nothing to do with Instagram specifically.  Considering how much nude work Emily has done, I don't think there's any question as to what her body looks like.

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

Models photoshopping their social media pictures is nothing new, although some really exaggerate and do it way too much/make it a little too obvious. It's pretty easy to see that Emily's body looks fuller/less toned when others post pictures about her but she's not as bad as others. I like Elsa Hosk, but she really needs to tone it down when it comes to altering her pictures. The difference is huge when you look at her own vs paparazzi pictures. Her legs and waist look 10x smaller/skinnier in her pictures than paparazzi shots or VS pictures.

I don't even get why most of these models do this, as their bodies look amazing naturally and they don't need those 39489303 layers of photoshop and slimming effects... It's just absurd. 

Positano, Italy, Jun 25 '17 (HQs)

 

   emilyr250617image101.jpg Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view    emilyr250617image104.jpg    emilyr250617image105.jpg    emilyr250617image106.jpg    emilyr250617image107.jpg    emilyr250617image108.jpg Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view    emilyr250617image137.jpg    emilyr250617image138.jpg    emilyr250617image139.jpg Image hidden for guestsSign in to view    emilyr250617image141.jpg Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view    emilyr250617image148.jpg Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view    emilyr250617image151.jpg    emilyr250617image152.jpg    emilyr250617image153.jpg Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view    emilyr250617image160.jpg Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view    emilyr250617image174.jpg    emilyr250617image175.jpg    emilyr250617image176.jpg    emilyr250617image177.jpg    emilyr250617image178.jpg    emilyr250617image179.jpg    emilyr250617image180.jpg    emilyr250617image181.jpg    emilyr250617image182.jpg
5 hours ago, *Luna* said:

Models photoshopping their social media pictures is nothing new, although some really exaggerate and do it way too much/make it a little too obvious. It's pretty easy to see that Emily's body looks fuller/less toned when others post pictures about her but she's not as bad as others. I like Elsa Hosk, but she really needs to tone it down when it comes to altering her pictures. The difference is huge when you look at her own vs paparazzi pictures. Her legs and waist look 10x smaller/skinnier in her pictures than paparazzi shots or VS pictures.

I don't even get why most of these models do this, as their bodies look amazing naturally and they don't need those 39489303 layers of photoshop and slimming effects... It's just absurd. 

I'm glad someone here understands where I'm coming from lol

1 hour ago, hottness said:

I'm glad someone here understands where I'm coming from lol

Lol, trust me, the feeling is mutual. Please do NOT hesitate to post more as it's very refreshing to actually see someone post something that makes a bit of sense.

Harper’s Bazaar Australia, August 2017

595373e6de787_01acover206.thumb.jpg.b120795de432599c1add3613f06ad722.jpg

I don't like the cover, there's something that disturbing me but I don't know exactly what. The other pictures for the editorial are good, nothing special. The interview is boring af, she says always the same things about her, her body and her "career". She used to be different, she doesn't give me good vibes anymore and this is so sad... I'd like to know what happens to her!!!

Harper’s Bazaar Australia, August 2017

5954c5211f9b4_01acover231.thumb.jpg.c5aad1c09dbd788466714492b727e9e2.jpg5954c5246381c_01acover232.thumb.jpg.2c11a4f46c91e2f9f7f16335406837e7.jpg

Those female mags just don't know how to work her look. Otherwise imo she's lookin good as ever. 

Marie Claire Turkey, July 2017

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

Zzz...there's a piece of the interview up she literally tells all these magazines the same exact thing. Such a bore.

 

@hottness I agree with you on pg 213

On 6/28/2017 at 8:07 AM, angeltay_hill said:

I don't like the cover, there's something that disturbing me but I don't know exactly what. The other pictures for the editorial are good, nothing special. The interview is boring af, she says always the same things about her, her body and her "career". She used to be different, she doesn't give me good vibes anymore and this is so sad... I'd like to know what happens to her!!!

For real, it's always like I'm hot and a sex symbol and if u don't like it that's your problem!!! My choice feminism is important because nudity is empowering for women!!!1 I take those male gaze instagram shots for feminism. She's so phony I wish she'd just be real

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 3

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.