Enrico_sw

You said it: Hollywood doesn't make documentaries. BTW, even a documentary can be politicised. What's better are history books (though nothing is purely objective). These two show/movies depict the 50s and 80s. They are fictions. Gay are not stoned to death unlike here in the present era. You see the difference?

Wrong guess. There's minimal to zero difference in terms of life quality between noble men and women. The difference between nobles and poor people was vastly higher. Immensely higher. I know modern teachings tell you that women are everlasting victims, but it's false. Poor people didn't even have proper nutrition and hygiene. Nobles (men and women) had it way better. Noble women had servants, maids, etc.

Since a long time in France. The criminalization of gay people stopped in 1791. Gay people were never massively thrown out of windows (unlike in the Middle East). In the UK, I know it's different (Alan Turing was condemned for being gay), but gay people in the West haven't been massively purged for centuries (unlike in the Middle East) You see the difference, right?

I'm not talking about your personal opinions. I'm sure they are highly respectable. I'm talking about the rapid progression of a totalitarian movement in our societies (called wokism/feminism).

You use to word "always" to generalise how someone talks. What you just did is extreme. I didn't generalise what you said. BTW, I was answering to your article, which grossly generalised as well. Gay people are treated correctly in the Western World. And rightfully so. Thankfully.

But all in all...

Today, straight white males who disagree with feminism and wokism will be punished. Physical or emotionally. Or both. Neo-feminism and wokism are a form of totalitarianism. One of the most famous French feminist wrote a book called “I hate men”. Here's a link. They say on Amazon that “The feminist book they tried to ban in France”. This is totally wrong. She was invited everywhere in the media, by leftist outlets to praise her and call her brave. She tries to victimise herself, but she's the oppressor now. Women who like traditional approaches are also bullied, intimidated and harassed by feminists. Like Estee. Because the woke approach is totalitarian.

Oppression is not a binary concept where one is either an everlasting oppressed or an everlasting oppressor. Men and women have been both oppressors and oppressed for a long time. It was way better to be a Noble woman in the 1500s Germany than a poor man. Way better.

Loving and supporting your family is a man's task since dawn of time. Because when the woman is pregnant, her capacities are diminished. So, the man collects the resources for the family. The couple is the most efficient form of organisation to take care of children (the tribe was an alternative but a dysfunctional one). Modern women who don't need no man (thanks to a man's invention... the contraceptive pill) are against people like Leonardo. I mean they're against 99% of men like Leonardo, until they meet their Leonardo. It's called hypergamy. It tends to cloud rational thinking around these subjects. The "article/definition" you quoted mentions P. Bourdieu. This guy was everything but neutral. He was a far left activist who used the Marxist matrix (oppressor/oppressed) and tried to apply it in societal analyses. This approach is not scientific. Sociology is not a hard science and it's highly falsifiable. Your "article/definition” says that what happens in Germany and the Middle East is the same. This is insane. Homosexuals are massacred and stoned to death in the Middle East (example). These “woke” and far left intellectuals are not serious. They don't live in reality. They live in fantasy world. They just want to blame their newfound scapegoat: straight white man. This is totalitarian.

Leonardo is a very competent and talented guy; of course he deserves his power and fame. He acts like a patriarch, so he protects his close ones, all of them. Good for him. But that's the good old patriarchy, is it not? I don't have a moral view on it, I just think that's how things are.

^ fun fact, Camila Morrone is famous because of her past relationship with Leo (the patriarch). In "modern" words, doesn't that mean that she owes everything to the patriarchy?

These vintage ads are great, thanks

Yep! And South Park's creators (Parker/Stone) are geniuses!

Anna Mae van Groningen, 4 March 2024

Anna Mae van Groningen, 3 October 2022

Femme Actuelle, 4 March 2024

Femme Actuelle, 3 October 2022

She's cute, but calling her "perfect" is a bit too much. I mean her face is good, but to me a great woman has to have ample bosoms like Lauren Mellor: And I think girls like Anna Mae have cuter smiles (but that's just a personal/subjective opinion - other people will disagree) I don't believe "science" can define perfection.

She's with: - Elite Amsterdam - Munich models