User19

I hate to agree with pinguoin, especially given the same predictable and tired response to anything lacking nudity, but I can't help think if you're going to do Lui, then do Lui. Half the photos are Sara awkwardly clutching at her chest. It really seems to limit how compelling her poses are. The (patented Bellemere) lighting makes up most of the visual interest of the photos for me.

Could we give a rest to condescending diatribes that we end with a plea that no one else comment on the subject? If you feel the conversation is over then you're free to not respond, but getting in your "final" words while simultaneously acting like everyone else is being an inconvenience for commenting is some tiresome narcissism.

I had seen this previously but never realized Olivia was in it. It's pretty difficult to tell who is who, but there are definitely points where she can be identified. Submerge by Mark Squires Warning: Nudity Submerge BTS by Mark Squires Warning: Nudity There are also some medium to low quality photos on Mark's site. I'm not going to bother bringing them over because I'm lazy, and it's pretty hard to tell which ones she's in: http://www.marksquiresphotography.com/index-pe/#/sub-merged/

Room 506 by Peter Langone Warning: Brief Nudity

Did anyone save the video in this post? Looks to have been deleted.

Source: http://www.vogue.it/en/beauty-look/news/2016/05/11/tan-plesure/ Warning: Nudity

What'd we miss?

She makes it sound as if she found one laying on a seat somewhere.

Wouldn't scanning a copy of trade marked material then putting your own water mark on it be the original offense? Of course it is. Too much brightness on that photo btw. It's not an issue of legality, it's a courtesy to the scanner, who also happens to be a member of this forum. It's not like it's Egotastic slapping their mark on any old image they pull from Google.

I'm not sure why she's going after FHM. They likely purchased the photos legally. If she suspects otherwise, she should talk to her agency and/or lawyer. She sounds pretty foolish conflating this with 'a woman's right to choose.' It's an ownership/copyright issue, not a women's rights issue.

I'm pretty sure this discussion began in response to a recent, complete nude photo. That photos has some fairly common telltale signs of plastic surgery. That isn't confirmation, but it's not an outrageous observation, either. I'm sorry if I don't put too much weight on a model denying that she's had work done; it's pretty par for the course.

While I didn't see all of what Jim wrote, I suspect it's the shape, not the size, that makes him believe they are implants. Whether or not you believe they are, you should still be able to see why someone could think they might be. Thinking a model's only consideration when it comes to implants would be whether or not she should look like Dolly Parton seems like a profound misunderstanding of the role of cosmetic surgery in multi-million dollar careers based on physical appearance.

Well, I'd say this looks to be V2.1, but he already did that with Virgin Island. Thank you for the heads up, at least. I would have been very disappointed to buy something I already own.

Is that last shot from a video, Vamp?

She's a model. So, no.

It's probably safe to say that it isn't a publicity stunt. She hasn't made any statements about it, and it's been almost two days without any major news outlet coverage (you, or someone working for you, would leak the story if you wanted it to get out). There is the slight possibility that it's a professional photographer overstepping his bounds a bit, but that seems unlikely since no one can seem to verify an origin. Best bet is that it's a leak, either accidental or malicious.

This kind of crap has never made sense to me, but it's just dumbfounding to hear it about this issue. Did you actually look at the lineup? User19 i think he meant the VS models look like 12 year old girls but I don't really get what you mean though. Are you saying it's the SI models who don't look like 'women' as opposed to VS? I'm not much of a VS fanboy so I can't really comment on that, but this year's SI issue is the best in years. I`m lost What crap? The need to praise something you like by putting down something you don't. It's practically epidemic around here. More to the point, it's outright bizarre to make that comment about an issue that, perhaps more than any other, prevalently features girls who have worked with VS.

This kind of crap has never made sense to me, but it's just dumbfounding to hear it about this issue. Did you actually look at the lineup?

Dequeker is the third editorial, so that does seem likely!

I can't recall the source off the top of my head, but it's my understanding that it was never shot.

It goes something like this: Candice got the fantasy bra this year. She has already been seen wearing it, but she also wears it for the fashion show on CBS. Adriana is in an episode of a CBS comedy in which she is wearing a (maybe) replica of the fantasy bra, likely as a form of cross-promotion. Some people believe this diminishes the honor. Some people think it's "below" the brand to promote in such a fashion. There are also some more colorful opinions about why CBS/VS would do this, because for some reason cross-promotion and product placement aren't compelling enough reasons. I'm kind of shocked anyone is still (was ever?) talking about this, but then again there are people in the Miranda thread that think acting civil in front of your child during/after a divorce means the divorce was a publicity stunt, so what do I know.

Thank you both, Pretty and Pheno: your efforts are always awesome and appreciated! As for the book, from all the photos I've seen it seems a bit...disappointing? I don't know what I expected, but with maybe the exception of that Brooklyn black and white they just seem bland or too close to the released photos. Hopefully I'm just judging it too early.

When you're on the line for $10 million dollars, I would be serious all the time to. Hope they are being paid well. First guy was laughing He was smirking, not laughing....big difference. Yeah, I couldn't tell if he was suppressing a laugh or just enjoying the view.

You know, it's weird, I suddenly forgot. Wow.