User19

I wonder if anyone at Madoff is going to get in trouble for that 3rd picture. Not that I'm complaining.

There was a video on Grazia's official site but now it's gone . Also two links that I posted when we were talking about this shoot are dead. Could you try this one ? I can't open it using my browser http://facedl.com/fv...kstage-at-our-c This session sparked rumors of Miranda's anorexia. Hmmmm .... maybe that's why they removed videos? It's strange that videos have disappeared from all sources. Yeah that link doesn't seem to work for me either. No big deal, I was just curious. It is strange that it seems to have been scorched from the internet. Edit: Nevermind, I found it here: http://www.facebook.com/GraziaAustralia?sk=videos Thanks for the lead!

Does anyone have the BTS video of this 2009 Grazia shoot by Georges Antoni? All the links I've found are dead. http://grazia.ninemsn.com.au/glance/877163/behind-the-scenes-with-miranda-kerr%5C Thanks in advance.

Way to take a stand. He asked a question, a few of us answered. I don't see the problem. He didn't come here asking, "OMGZ r there NE Irina nudez?" Frankly, I find discussion of past modeling work, i.e. SI, more at home at a fashion forum than candids, but I'm not going to get condescending about it. I could talk all day about SI and their approach to nipples, and it would be more appropriate to this forum than anything you could say about those candids.

The one where she wears a cowboy hat? If so, I also noticed that a while ago. There is one while she's reclining in some ruins too (Update: Nevermind! That's 2009.). I've always been surprised it made it past the censors. It's like Brooklyn's: it's just right out there.

Looks to be a heavy hand with the makeup and bronzer, as the rest of her skin is not so orange.

The photos just went on the site a few hours ago. You'll have to give someone time to get the magazine and scan it, or give the photographers time to post the photos on their respective sites, assuming that they do.

Where are the BTS shots from? Panama, January 5, 2012 Thank you, but I meant where did you find them online.

Where are the BTS shots from?

I don't know, it's a see-through dress. There's still a good amount of sexy there.

You need to text link nudity or a mod is going to delete your images. As for larger images, I've tried finding them in the past myself. The shoot is quite old, which makes it difficult to track down. I'm not even certain Lush Magazine exists any longer.

According to 6 different websites I checked... Both sets of photos are her. I don't know if it's true but they all claim they were taken at different times and at different places. One set was the topless sunbathing pics and the other set showed her wearing a pink bikini. They would have all gotten the photos from the same source, which is no doubt where they were originally mislabeled. It's pretty clear that it's two different girls, and it's pretty clear which is Jessica.

Warning: Brief Nudity Colcci http://vimeo.com/41965267 and Colcci BTS http://vimeo.com/41952828 Videos by Frank Ramos

Janell Shirtcliff

I realize it's a long shot, but I cannot shake the idea that two photos on those walls looks a great deal like Adriana Lima--the black and white photo in the upper-left hand corner of the first picture, and the girl with the gun directly over Izabel in the second.

I don't have time to create a download link for the video, but some sexy stuff is happening on the Vogue Italia site. Warning: Nudity http://www.vogue.it/magazine/fashion-stori...-mario-sorrenti

Viola0605, for the love of what ever PLEASE!!! stop use pornsite for upload you pic/gifs or what ever! It's freaking disgusting!!! Moderators, can't you guys and gals stop this use of filthy sites! If you click to see the gif in motion you'll see brutalsex abusy on the site viola is useing and I don't think thats ok to use in a forum for the public where who ever are welcome to become a member... Who knows how old fans whos hanging here is? Minor age? Is it ok that this site is allowing sexsites for upload pics/videos/gif or whatnot? I wonder how Candice is reacting if/when she clicks to see a pic of her here and it takes her to a porn site. Wonder if she would like her fans to see pics of her on a pornsite. Probably not! So please for the love of someone! Stop useing pornsites! Badboy Get adblock and move on. Bloody hell. If a parent isn't there to monitor what their child is seeing then perhaps said parent should become more proactive and stop being lazy. There are numerous ways to get around these quote on quote offensive ads, and if you or the parent of said minors are to lazy to figure them out then that's on them, not the uploader. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ad-blocker/ solves all your needs with a simple click. Why not just forbid pornsite uploads? Why should everybody use adblock? Have you seen the pics on that site that viola was useing??? Take a GOOD LOOK at the pics!!! Why should I move on? Forbid porn in public forums period!!! Badboy Easier said than done (at least for posting nudity). Most free image hosts, if they allow nudity at all, require the uploads to be listed as "mature", or something analogous. Once that happens, it opens the ads on the page up to porn ads.

It's only defamatory if Ms. Neophitou says Kate bought her face, which she did not say. Kate would have to not only argue that Ms. Neophitou's words implied that Kate had plastic surgery--a difficult task, since they literally do not say so--but then she would have to prove that that statement resulted in loss of work, another monumental task since plastic surgery is often used as a way to enhance one's career in modeling. You're missing an important part of defamation, which is a false statement spoken with the knowledge that it is false--something opinion is exempt from not only because opinion cannot be proved or disproved, but also because opinion is spoken with the belief that it is true. Only then does it matter if the statement results in loss of work, etc. Think of it this way: a negative review at work is not inherently defamatory, even if it results in you not getting future work. The negative review would only become defamatory if it included known, false information, such as saying you stole from the company, when you did not. I absolutely agree it was uncalled for, but while people CAN sue for anything (winning is a different matter, of course), Kate would be better off letting the negative press handle Ms. Neophitou's future at VS. Public opinion is massively important for the retail industry--I'd be surprised if Ms. Neophitou's words went unnoticed by VS's public relations department.

Now if I were Kate or her management I'd be looking to sue the bitch. <_< "She's like a Page 3 girl & She

Well, I'm underwhelmed. In the instance of full disclosure, I have not viewed every single photo yet, but I'm nearly through, and some patterns are making themselves abundantly clear. 1. No Brooklyn. Now, granted, we knew Brooklyn wasn't making an appearance this year going in, but the more of the issue I see the more obvious her absence is. I know Brooklyn tends to polarize people, but she brings the much needed fun and personality--along with a carefree sexiness--that SI truly demands of its successful models. 2. Bar's shots are awful. Like most of you, I had high hopes for Bar's return. The results of the shoots are lackluster and are the most blatant examples of the sins SI has committed this year. Instead of the youthful and fun Bar, we got looks of boredom and general disinterest. Bar is not the only source of blame, SI can claim ownership of the least inspirational backdrop they could imagine: a studio with portrait backdrop and lighting, coupled with a premise that didn't work when it was musicians and continues to flop with athletes. 3. Body paint has lost its foundation. SISwim was developed as an excuse to put beautiful models in bikinis during the winter months, and body paint was an excuse to get them out of those bikinis. Beyond the base joy of implied nudity, there as a certain magic in the idea of using a medium like paint to replicate the look of a bikini. SI needs to remember what made the idea so compelling to begin with, and it wasn't athletes (or WAGs), and it wasn't shooting in a studio. SI needs to realize that photoshop--especially excessive photoshop--ruins the "trick" of body painting. The hand is so heavy they might as well forgo the paint all together and just photoshop the bikinis on in post. As for the athletes this year: Natalie Coughlin is a cute young woman who looks about 40 in her shots, and SI made Natalie Gulbis look like a pornstar. 4. Photoshop from hell. Is this really the best SI can do? With their budget? All texture has been obliterated from the girls' skin: they may as well be plastic. And if I see another nippleless wonder I'm going to throw up. SI needs to decide on their stance on nudity, sheer and otherwise, and then they need to shoot with that in mind. If they don't want to show nipples they shouldn't be shooting in see-through clothing. The compromise leads to mediocrity: photos that are ruined because SI wants the sexiness of sheer without the taboo of the female nipple. I mean, can someone tell me who thinks the halo on this photo looks good? http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012_swim...e-vawer_11.html 5. The cover is trash. And not because of Kate. I'm not exactly Kate's biggest fan, and there are a handful of girls I would have rather seen receive the honor, but they all would have looked equally horrible if Kate's cover is any indication. Kate is a voluptuous girl, and they somehow managed to pull all visual indicators of depth out of the photo. It looks like a shot of an over-photoshopped cardboard cutout. 6. All the shots look the same. (With notable exceptions.) Now, I get that SISwim is a brand and therefore there exists some nebulous idea of the perfect SI shot, much as one would say about VS. The problem, however, is that the pursuit of this perfect image results in poor copy after poor copy. Why bother with multiple photographers when the results can hardly be distinguished? I don't know if the fault lies with the photographers for trying to shoot in SI's style, or the selection process, in which "non-SI" shots get weeded out, but I could hazard a guess that the latter plays a huge role. 7. Stunted creativity. There is an instance in one of the behind the scenes videos of Anne V completely nude on the beach, covering her back end with a butt-shaped coconut. The resulting shots are no where to be seen. Instead Anne V is featured in centered shot after centered shot, in bikini A, bikini B, bikini C... Now implied nudity on a beach isn't exactly groundbreaking, but at least it would have been a break from the monotony. And then there are shots like Irina and the cheetahs. How does Irina sitting next to an animal, restrained fear on her face, make for good images? She's barely modeling in the shots, probably because she's too worried about moving or taking her eyes off of the wild animals. A frozen Irina next to a frozen cheetah does not make for a dynamic image--I imagine the only reason they saw the light of day is because shooting the cats was expensive and time consuming--and it's that lazy gimmick that seems to be taking over SI. Instead of focusing on making the models more engaging, they bring in an athlete, or a musician, or an animal, or photoshop the crap out of a bored looking model. 8. Thank god for video, but...The videos are really the saving grace of the issue at this point, probably because the awful post-work group can't get their hands on them, but even they suffered a decline this year. I get the point of the "Intimate" videos they introduced last year--SI is taking the same step towards video editorial that the fashion world is--but, with select exceptions, most of them are less engaging than the behind-the-scenes footage. And it seems that SI is phasing out true behind-the-scenes footage of the shoots. While we used to get at least 2-3 solid minutes of each model in from of the camera, this year we've been relegated to little more than a minute of that. The "Profile" videos play out like the "Intimate" videos--that is, the model prancing in front of the video camera rather than posing for the photographer--spliced with an interview, and the "Outtakes" videos are more focused on the crew playing games than the model or the photographer. 9. Thank god for Nina. I started this point as "Thank god for rookies," but while writing it I realized I was really only writing about Nina. In a magazine that has offered little for their returning models to be excited about, Nina is a youthful and playful addition. Her range isn't exactly staggering, but I'll take smiles over disinterest any day. There are other standouts, of course. Alyssa, for instance, is bringing that sultriness that we used to get from Irina, and Kate, when she doesn't venture into caricature--really more of an issue in her videos than photos--is at least able to deliver a coy sex appeal. 10. The short of it: improving SISwim. A light, restrained hand when it comes to photoshop (SI is about natural beauty). No studio shots (SI is about natural light and exotic environments). No athletes, musicians, WAGs, etc. (SISwim is often criticized as having nothing to do with sports, but that is exactly how the issue was envisioned. It was meant as a reprieve, and injecting athletes into it is inorganic to the premise). A variation in shots (SISwim is not a catalogue). Sorry for the novel, but the more I explored my feelings of disappointment, the more they seemed to become a general annoyance with the direction in which SISwim is heading.

THIS! SI is the last magazine/modeling job that is still taking healthy/curvy girls at this point. Having Candice there would be completely against what SI represents IMO. Just look at the SI girls: Brooklyn Decker, Bar Refaeli, Kate Upton, Jessica Gomes, Damaris Lewis, Jessica White ... They all have naturally curvy bodies. Even Irina Shayk has a pretty decent looking butt without doing creepy posing, SI is the place of T&A & Candice does not belong in there. I would die if i ever see Candice in SI, that would be a sad day The models you've named are no doubt what SI is notorious for--and it has promoted itself as a haven for curvy models--but let's not pretend they haven't found a place for women with similar bodies to Candice. For all their Bar Refaelis and Brooklyn Deckers, they have a Hilary Rhoda, an Anne V, or a Julie Henderson. Hell, just last year's rookies alone added Alyssa Miller, Izabel Goulart, and, perhaps the most shocking of all, Shannan Click. It's hard to argue that SI has drawn a clear demographic that Candice does not fit into when you have Shannan Click in body paint.