FAMAMOCA

Wow, just noticed this; thanks to both of you. Now I don't feel so sorry for Jule Campbell anymore. My understanding is that she was pushed out - is that true? I believe the first picture below is that one shot, and it's a stunner. But isn't the second one a take from the same shoot? Hi. 1. Cindy in SISE. No, the picture you posted (left) is not the one we are aware of. If that was published in SISE, or any SI calendar, we are not aware of it. The one picture of Cindy published in SISE we are aware of is a full-length shot of Cindy in profile, standing in the shallow pool of a fountain. Cindy is also the December page of the 1989 Sports Illustrated wall calendar: photographed by Marc Hispard, she is wearing a yellow and blue maillot. The second picture you posted (right) we cannot positively source. Sorry. As far as we know, it is not from any SI magazine issue or calendar. Try http://www.famamoca.com/ and search in SISE and Calendars for Cindy Crawford. 2. Jule Campbell. I don't the answer to whether she was pushed out, or what happened. I have read many, many issues of SI, and have specifically looked for an issue which might have mentioned her exit or retirement, and thanked her or wished her well or similar. That blurb and/or magazine may exist, but I haven't found it. It's hard to tell what the truth is just from watching a video. To me, I think it's sort of the lesson, or "a" lesson, of "reality" television, that content can be edited in a way to make people look more or less heroic or petty or whatever. When I met Niki Taylor, she said something just like that, about the editing of a reality television program she had appeared in. I thought something had been one way, and she said she thought it was (literally) the opposite. Again, I don't know what the truth is, but watching the SISE videos, I have a fairly positive impression of Jule Campbell. The one thing that stands out to me is a segment where Jule is with Carol Alt, and if I remember correctly, Walter Iooss Jr. Jule tells Walter that this particular suit Carol is wearing is to be photographed from the front only, that they can make a statement with it that way. And Carol agrees. In that segment, and others, I just got the impression that Jule was looking out for the models, and sensitive to what they were comfortable with. The impression I got. And I would say, on the other side, she (Jule) has an unintentionally funny segment with Jay Maisel, while he is photographing (or trying to photograph) Elle Macpherson. I think it's the 1989 video. Maisel is a great photographer, I think he has photo credits in SISE going back to at least 1967, and here Jule is nagging him in 1988, instructing him about how to communicate with a model he is photographing.

Agree.

Hi. It's in Marco Glaviano's book, Sirens.

1 Kim Alexis 2 Dalma 3 Alexa Singer 4 Joanne Russell 5 Janice Dickinson 6 Tara Shannon 7 ??? 8 Kathy Ireland 9 Brit Hammer 10 Iman 11 Carol Alt 12 Paulina

Oh, that's interesting. Thank you! The following year (1989), Cindy would be the cover of rival SPORT magazine's swimsuit issue. She is the most-featured model in that issue, which included other top models from Elite (Kelly Emberg, Carrie Nygren, Jill Goodacre, ...), with photography by Glaviano, who was also doing the Elite agency swimsuit calendars. So there is kind of "that feeling" of a disagreement, or a spat of some kind (money?, who got the cover?, or what?), with Cindy's agency placing her and other of its top models in a rival publication. Kathy Ireland was still with Elite (she is in the '89, '90, and '91 agency swimsuit calendars) though, I believe, and she certainly continued to appear in SI. Glaviano shoots for SISE in '96, but I think no other time. By any chance, do you recall where you read it or saw Cindy's comments?

Hi. It's from the 14 March 1988 issue of Sports Illustrated, page 4, "Letters". It won't be in "HQ", but Sports Illustrated has the entire issue available online, for free. Several weeks after publication of the swimsuit issue (February), SI would (sometimes?) run a collection of readers' letters complimenting/criticizing the swimsuit issue. SI would also sometimes run an additional picture (or two), as here. Like this one of Cindy, there are a couple of Kathy Ireland, for example, that were published in a "Letters" follow-up and (to the best of our understanding) never anywhere else (not even the calendars or diaries). Given the number of frames that you would expect Hispard would have shot with Cindy, it's surprising that one and only one made it into the actual swimsuit issue. This is the second of the two total published in SI that we are aware of. Sometimes the shots just turn out crummy and you don't find out until too late, but why they only printed these two is a story I'd like to hear.

Probably there are many others, but that is the only photo I know, Cindy taken by Helmut Newton. It's in the MAX calendar photographed by Newton (along with Stephanie, Iman, Claudia, Carla Bruni, Nadja ...), and I think also Vogue, though I don't know which edition/issue.

Really great photograph. It's part of the HOT SPOTS photo edit, photographed by Marco Glaviano, on page 93 of the 1996 SI Swimsuit magazine. It's also in the 1996 calendar & screen-saver CD-ROM software kit, but cropped differently: There is more of the image above and left (above her head and where she is looking). Also tells you what they think the correct colors are, since they produced the digital file. If you're a fan of Rebecca's, the CD-ROM kit is nice. It includes some rare stuff, and she's frequently featured, including short video clips of her with Ingrid Seynhaeve, and Angie Everhart.

Flaunt magazine has a photo retrospective in a blog post: http://flaunt.com/blogs/editorialdepartmen...model-volume-ii

Thanks missparker7 for IDs + sources! (Y) Nicely done on your site too. Very useful/interesting to see the different pubs of the image.

Wow, that's early Kathy Ireland too! Totally unknown to me. Zowie! I can't make out the photographer. Do you know who it is? Do you have the source? (Kathy Ireland and Renee Simonsen as sisters. "Why sisters are special." Yes, yes. Interesting.)

Never been on a VS set, but I would speculate as above, and yes, also pads and tape. Also make-up. For example, there is a picture of Niki Taylor from when she is quite young, and you can see (at least what always appears to me) to be a line of make-up applied to create a shadow where she would have had/you would expect to see cleavage. That was pre-digital photography; adding shadow to a photograph with Photoshop is trivial. Clothing may also be pinned or taped to make it hang or fit better.

A: Neither are Stephanie. #1: Paulina Porizkova (1987); from Glaviano's "Models: Sittings 1978-1988". #2: Alexandra Brochen; from Sport magazine's swimsuit issue (February 1989). Good job Jim T. (Y) Thanks for the IDs + sources!

Sad to discover that Karen and her husband Jack White are divorcing. http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2011/06/10/...tml?ref=reuters Under The Gun Review has a copy of the party invite. http://underthegunreview.net/2011/06/10/ka...rce-plan-party/

You can definitely ask (and, again, I really admire you for doing it), but based on your desired use, I wouldn't be too hopeful. If you have a lot of money, then you can make things like this happen, but otherwise, probably not. Here's why (in my opinion): If we were licensing our company's event photographs, then your proposed use would undercut our sales. You would put this photo into your online gallery and let anyone download it, free. That photo's value is now really diminished. Why would anyone else ever want to pay us for this photograph? They could see it on your site for free, and it would undoubtedly end up being shared/spread all over the Internet just as freely. It would lose its novelty and its value. There's no way we could control it. So, forget it. If you were writing an article or a blog, and you wanted to license a couple of images, you might get some interest. But to put a bunch of pictures into a gallery for anyone/everyone to download for free, I wouldn't be too hopeful about anyone licensing you their work. You can still ask, and the worst people will say is "No", after all. But I wouldn't be too hopeful. Sorry. I do have an odd-ball suggestion, though: If you are sincerely willing to pay for licensed use, and what you want is just to run a free gallery of Claudia, you might consider just outright hooking-up with a photographer. Maybe you could team-up with a couple of other webmasters. In theory, you could pay a photographer to cover Claudia's event/appearance, and all the pictures would then be yours. I don't know where you live, or what publication laws and responsibilities and liabilities would apply to you, and you would have to figure all that out and write good contracts and maybe get licenses and all that. Paparazzi/stalkarazzi is a different thing, and I wouldn't touch any of that. But if we are talking about an actual planned event where the woman is anticipating being seen and photographed and interviewed by the media, and where your photographer applies for and gets an event-media pass, I would think you would be in really good shape. You could probably find a photographer to cover an event like that for a couple of hundred dollars, or less. We cover those events, and if you helped out with my costs, I would definitely be willing to share pictures with you. So maybe that's something that you could work out.

Hi, thanks for the website. I signed up intending to purchase some of the candids but 99% were not for public use. So my question is, for anyone who may know, are there any photography websites similar to the one posted where I can actually buy the images? Thanks Hi. First of all, would like to give you a . It's just so nice to see someone who wants to BUY a photograph. What do you mean by "public use"? I didn't go through the whole photoshelter sign-up or Terms of Use, but the sign-up page says "save images for personal use". Do you want a license to use/publish the photographs, or do you want to add them to your private collection? You could ask photoshelter for clarification. Worst is they say "No." You may be able to deal with the photographer(s) directly. Ask.

Yes I know: It is out of ELLE US September 1988 ( really old) with Rachel Williams and Carre Otis! Good job Sheila! (Y)

It looks like an ad for Giorgio Sant'Angelo (the designer). "Molto" is Italian for "very". Wish the ad was in our catalog and could give you an original source. I believe that is a young Carre Otis, Rachel Williams, and Claudia. I would try issues of Vogue or ELLE from ~1987-8. Only thing close our catalog could find for Sant'Angelo is a page from the edit THE SHOCK OF THE NEW for 2 Mar 1987 issue of New York Magazine. It's that very beautiful picture of Paulina Porizkova in a beige, off-the-shoulder knit dress, photographed by Demarchelier. Superbly beautiful. You can search our site, or here is the direct link to the source for that: http://books.google.com/books?id=seMCAAAAM...p;q&f=false Please post an original source for your ad if you find one.

This appears to be a fake (possibly you knew that). http://www.vectorsite.net/zkiss_09.html And out of curiosity, I did look: WorldCat does not have a title matching "Sad-Eyed Siren", nor an author matching "Jason S Rodham".

Actually, it is useful, if you tag it with the word "FAKE" and give the source.

Wow, again. Too bad, again, there's no metadata in the file. They appear to belong with the PEARLS OF THE ORIENT editorial, shot by Hispard for the 1988 SI swimsuit issue. The second and fourth (L-to-R) appear to match shots in the issue, p 96-97 and 86. First and third unknown. Wow, again.

Wow. It's too bad there's no metadata with the pics. They appear to be from a session with Glaviano, ~1987. The "USA" swimsuit looks like the cover of the 1989 ELITE calendar, but a different pose. The white looks like the Sep-Dec 1987 page from the ELITE 1988 calendar, but again a different pose. Never seen the black before. Wow.

Neat! Love to see all the different publications for 1 picture like this! In SI, it's the Table of Contents for the 9 Feb 1987 SI Swimsuit edition, ph John G Zimmerman. You can get the entire issue online from the SI Vault, by the way.

If you missed it, Cindy tweeted this pic today, a knockoff of Ritts' Stephanie, Cindy, Christy, Tatjana, and Naomi. http://www.whosay.com/cindycrawford/photos/28012 Somewhere, I think I read a story about Christy not being booked for the shot, but was tagging along to the session with her friend Naomi and so posed for it. Does anyone know or remember that story? I tried for quite a while to find it, but couldn't. Or am I just totally out there, and not remembering correctly??