.jpg.6a48d3fe1a9866b96f88d954fae87189.jpg)
justwastingtime
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by justwastingtime
-
.thumb.jpg.5e9036bdf55cc33e2255907dd404e357.jpg)
I've never much cared for Gisele, or the Brazilians generally. Gisele just looks too hawk-faced and scowly in her photos. That's just how I react to her personally; not trying to invalidate anyone else's reaction. But it might also be because she's part of the next generation after the 90's girls, and it's just like rock music: if you like 60's rock the best, in your mind you often build up a rationalization that everything that came afterward is no good. -
Ah, the joys of plunder:
Thanks, Spiral! Not the first time she has caught my eye, without my being able to place her. Don't know why she wasn't a bigger name.
Her face is just so beautiful - I can't believe she would be unknown. I think the year of this shot was 1989. Could it be Rebecca Romijn? She'd have been 18 yrs old at the time.
Paulina's legs may have been a little short, but only by supermodel standards. We need bikini shots in bare feet, plus a ruler. I measure Paulina's leg-to-height ratio below at 0.47, which for her height of 5'10" gives her about a 33" inseam. That's respectable, longer than me, and her face and body are beautiful, so who cares? Cindy, though, has a ratio of 0.51, which I just find so juicy and sexy - for her height of 5'9" that's a 35" inseam. And Ashley's legs, you're right, were just crazy. SI girls don't come like that anymore.
I've always thought that Angie deserves a lot more credit and fame, simply as a beauty. And a durable beauty too. She actually got hotter as she got older, IMO.
Inspired by blsmn63, I've done some ravishing and plundering of my own. Several are very nice. Sorry for the raggedy layout!
Not specifically 80's related, but everyone here seems to know the business really well, so I'll ask it here. Why is it next to impossible to find inseam measurements for models? Legginess is a huge factor in a model's attractiveness. Take two girls who are both 5' 10", for instance. Other things being equal, who's hotter: the one with a 32" inseam (like me, lol), or the one with a 35" inseam?
What a spectacular site! Thanks for the link, jOEh!
Much appreciated! You might want to check out Capt. Bob's topics in Gen Babe Discussion; he posts a lot of vintage VS scans, though mostly from 90's and later. Back when the WWW first started up, there were lots of tribute websites for specific supermodels, and I never could understand why there were no Jill tributes, even though her pictures were so sexy and her beauty just so intense. Maybe she was just a little too early, or maybe people's tastes just differ...
Cindy's body double, Nicole Clark, standing to left of Cindy. Rather a hottie in her own right - as she'd have to be! Story in the link. http://www.foxnews.c...e-body-doubles/
Love this. This dress is so beautiful - the sheer part at the knees and the solid part above makes it look short and long at the same time. She deserves it. There is no end to my love for Yasmeen.
Well, I don't like her, but I do have to admit that those pictures of her in the flowing red bare-shoulder gown are simply STUNNING, and I've never seen anything like them. Beautiful, beautiful, beautiful! If she is indeed pregnant, she has just won the pregnancy beauty contest of the decade. See how fair-minded I am? I might start to like her after all...
This is the picture where I first started to get into her, after not liking her at first. Partly because it's intriguing how part of her face is hidden, and partly because the decolletage is so lovely. Then I had to admit to myself that the face was lovely too. And that was the first beginnings of my obsession! (Eric Roberts, on the other hand, I can do without. )
All painfully true. Her face is kind of hard-looking now. That stunning, luminous beauty she had in her twenties has departed. Some kinds of beauty which burn the most brightly, tend to burn out, alas. Still, she's aged better than some. (Jill Goodacre my God I can't bear to look at now - so depressing.) And I have seen some recent candids of her that were legitimate eye candy. We just need to clone her at 5 year intervals - then we'd be happy.
Funny, sexy special-effects chocolate commercial where Cindy finds the chocolate so delicious that she accidentally licks off her mole! She's startled at first, then shrugs. Interesting to see her w/o it.
Facing some tough competition here from The Most Beautiful Woman in the World (according to some). The first pic shows that she was indeed shorter: But her body had other advantages:
